top of page

2025 Draft Class List

1

Cooper Flagg

221

Summary

Flagg presents as a two-way star contributing positively as a creator and/or finisher on the offensive end while guarding multiple positions on the defensive end. Flagg’s versatility, effort, basketball instincts, competitiveness, size, and athleticism allow him to impact the game in many roles. He is like the queen piece on a Chess board. He can play on any team under any style. Offensively, he demonstrates the ability to create for himself and others or serve in a complementary role: rebounding or setting screens. Defensively, he successfully guards on the perimeter or plays with physicality in the post. He has a great motor and remains engaged on and off the ball. He consistently positions himself appropriately within the defensive scheme to make a positive impact throughout the game.

Expectations

I expect Flagg to transition to the NBA quickly becoming a consistent starter who influences opponents’ gameplans and competes for All-Star or All-NBA accolades. The small margin of difference between his standard grade and ceiling grade speak to the confidence I have in him playing at a high level throughout his career.

Offensive Notes

Flagg’s effectiveness is rooted in his fundamental footwork. He plays balanced and under control while landing on two feet and utilizing either pivot foot to create an opening out of the triple threat. Flagg creates offensive advantages before he takes his first dribble. His footwork extends beyond the perimeter as he maintains the same effectiveness in the post.

In addition to his footwork, his ball handling is advanced demonstrating an array of combination moves to create and attack angles. He loves to utilize his spin move to create space for his shot or get to the rim to finish using either hand. Flagg utilizes these techniques to create shots for himself at all three-levels. He changes directions and stops well with the ball. He plays off two feet, maintaining the ability to pivot off either foot to create an opening or find a teammate for an open look. Flagg creates out of isolation but is just as effective utilizing a ball-screen. He keeps his dribble alive versus variable coverages and maintains his composure to attack defensive weaknesses. Flagg consistently maintains his court vision and demonstrates keen anticipation to read defensive rotations. He delivers accurate passes using either hand off the dribble.

Although Flagg’s shooting may be inconsistent leading to wild misses, his overall efficiency was above average from the field, free throw line, and three-point line. Flagg has a sound follow through and quick release. He also sets his feet well to obtain his balance before shooting. His effectiveness from the perimeter will improve as his consistency in his shooting release stabilizes. Near the rim, Flagg is aggressive and fearless. He attacks the rim with ferocity and is a capable finisher using either hand.

Flagg is as dynamic off-ball as he is on-ball. He spaces the floor appropriately avoiding congestion and demonstrates an innate sense of when to cut for easy opportunities. His effort is inspiring as he consistently crashes the glass looking to create second chance opportunities. Flagg also utilizes off-ball screens well as he sinks low to cut sharply off curl screens or pin-downs to finish attacking at the rim or shooting off the catch.

Defensive Notes

Flagg’s effectiveness as a defender begins from his stance and footwork. Flagg sits low in his stance ready to change directions. He maintains width within his defensive stance allowing him to change directions while guarding the ball. Although his footspeed is average, his length, flexible hips, and stride allow him to recover and contest if beaten guarding on the perimeter.

Flagg maintains his effort and engagement while guarding the ball. He reacts well to screens and understands the game plan and the opposition’s personnel to react appropriately to ball-screens. He is intent on disrupting ball handlers and as a result, he may reach in carelessly leading to fouls or react to shot fakes chasing blocks creating attacking angles. Fortunately, Flagg recovers well to contest making it difficult for opposing players to score. On the block, Flagg has the size, strength, and physicality to guard front court players. He plays low to generate leverage and holds his ground well versus back down attempts.

Off-ball, Flagg consistently reads offensive actions and demonstrates great anticipation to jump passing lanes or rotate to challenge perimeter shooters. He communicates with his teammates and is as much a captain on the defensive end as he is a creator on the offensive end. He offers variable screen coverage and is effective at dropping, hedging, switching, and trapping. Flagg keeps his arms engaged affecting passing lanes and is always a threat to tip a pass for a steal resulting in a fast break opportunity.

Lastly, Flagg makes his presence felt on the defensive glass. He immediately locates an opponent to boxout and high points rebounds to end defensive possessions. His ball skills and athleticism allow him to lead the break in transition or deliver an accurate outlet pass to a streaking teammate for an easy finish.

2

Dylan Harper

213.2

Summary

Harper presents as a two-way playmaking starting guard who initiates the offense on one end and contributes positively on the defensive end. Harper is an advanced ball handler who demonstrates poise and anticipation while setting up his defender and reading the defense to create for himself or his teammates. He is a three-level scorer who consistently creates and exploits advantages. He can play off-ball but is more suited to initiate the offense to maximize his strengths. Harper’s size, athleticism, and instincts aid in his ability to defend guards and wings effectively. His defensive footwork, on-ball defensive energy, and engaged intensity led to turnovers for transition opportunities. He is a versatile scorer, distributor, and defender who fits seamlessly into any lineup.

Expectations

I expect Harper to earn and sustain a starting role at the next level. He will impact the game positively for his team leading to a winning environment and has the potential to earn All-NBA and All-Star accolades throughout his career. I have strong confidence that Harper will maintain a starting role for an NBA franchise for a prolonged period.

Offensive Notes

Harper is very talented, demonstrating sound footwork fundamentals while showcasing advanced ball handling and finishing skills near the rim. He utilizes the triple threat extremely well to keep defenders off-balance. His jab steps and ball fakes are convincing and understands his strengths to create attacking angles. Harper consistently plays off two feet and creates openings amid congestion from help defenders.

On the perimeter, Harper is an extremely advanced ball handler. He demonstrates an array of moves to lull his defenders to sleep before exploding by them. As defenders hurry to recover, he stops on the dime changing the angle of his attack to continue his pursuit to the rim but may pick up his dribble to pull up from the midrange. Harper also uses his ball handling ability and instincts to set up screens. He reads defensive coverages well and reacts quickly to expose a weakness or opening. Harper’s long strides, balance, and athleticism are showcased as he knifes through the lane to finish at the rim using either hand. His strength allows him to finish through contact, and his concentration and agility allow him to contort his body to evade shot blockers. Due to his aggressive attacking style and savviness, Harper is advanced at drawing contact and getting to the free throw line.

As effective as Harper is to create for himself, he remains unselfish and maintains his court vision to find his teammates. He anticipates and reads defensive rotations to find his teammates on time and in rhythm. He understands his gravity and the attention he draws utilizing it to his advantage. Harper has the tendency to force passes or over dribble contributing to his elevated turnover rate.

Off-ball, Harper’s activity and presence are diminished. He is a timely cutter, but overall movement and action are lacking. His shooting efficiency is a work in progress. Although he is a capable three-level scorer, his shot trajectory is flat at times affecting his overall consistency. He shoots off the dribble or off the catch and maintains his confidence throughout a game. He demonstrates the willingness to compete on the offensive glass and is very dynamic during transition. Overall, Harper is a tremendous competitor shining during tense moments at the end of the game. He wants the ball at the end of the game or during a scoring drought to create a quality attempt.

Defensive Notes

Harper is an effective defender. He maintains a low stance and is very light on his feet to cut off driving angles. His defensive footwork, on-ball defensive energy, and engaged intensity lead to turnovers for transition opportunities. He anticipates well defending against isolation plays as he will take away an attacker's primary direction forcing them into a counter move. Harper fights well over screens, but his overall consistency guarding around screens needs improvement.

Off-ball, Harper relies on his instincts, length, and speed to jump passing lanes or trap after passes to create transition opportunities. His defensive aggressiveness can lead to openings for his opponents putting his teammates in a position to recover. If not directly involved in the action, Harper may have lapses in concentration resulting in late coverage around stagger and curl screens or being exposed on a backdoor.
Fortunately, Harper is actively engaged on the glass and consistently finds a body to boxout. Once Harper secures a rebound, he quickly becomes an offensive threat putting his opponents on their heels hurrying to keep him from getting to the rim.

3

VJ Edgecombe

193.2

Summary

Edgecombe presents as a dynamic two-way starting guard/wing who regularly contributes positively to a complimentary role on the offensive and defensive end. Edgecombe possesses extreme athletic ability that allows him to cover ground effortlessly and play above the rim. Although Edgecombe has creation ability, that is an area of further development. He excels off the ball offensively as he is a dynamic slasher and finisher near the rim who capably spaces the floor, crashes the glass, and runs the floor in transition. Defensively, Edgecombe maintains the same effort and tenacity guarding the ball while also hustling to rotate and recover to contest shots on the perimeter or protect the rim in the paint. His athleticism, length, and range allow him to influence offensive actions. He is disruptive and most importantly, engaged on the defensive end.

Expectations

I expect Edgecombe to earn and sustain a starting role at the next level. He may develop into a primary scoring option, but even without reaching that level, he will contribute positively to a winning organization. His ability to achieve the heights of his ceiling grade are dependent on his offensive development where he can become an All- Star feature and All-NBA candidate. He demonstrated immense growth as his freshman season progressed, and I have great trust in his work ethic and basketball understanding.

Offensive Notes

Edgecombe is an explosive athlete but is not over reliant on his athleticism to maintain his effectiveness. Edgecombe plays with balance and uses his triple threat well to create an attacking angle. Due to his first step explosiveness, he requires the slightest of openings to blow by his defender. He dips low while attacking to get defenders on his hip and then uses his balance and striding ability to beat the second line of defense. His footwork creates the opening, and his athleticism exploits it to an impressive degree. He can explode to the rim to finish above his opponents, contort his body to finish around them, or stop on two feet to use his footwork to convert a composed finish. Unfortunately, he presents as a straight-line driver at this time as his ball handling against pressure or in traffic exposes him to turnovers.

Edgecombe’s flashes ball handling creativity and skill but his execution lacks consistently especially against pressure. Fortunately, he does not need to rely on his ball handling to create an advantage as he is rarely cut off by his defender forcing him to change directions. Edgecombe creates using ball-screens but is best at attacking his defenders from the triple threat or receiving a pass during defensive rotations. Due to his explosiveness, defenders are often out of position attempting to recover leading to fouls where he converts at a high rate. Edgecombe is also unselfish and understands spacing and where his teammates will be after attacking. He willingly passes to his teammates in rhythm and consistently encourages them throughout the game.

Edgecombe excels off the ball as he poses multiple threats against his opponents. He is a three-level scorer who’s shooting efficiency from the perimeter improved as the season progressed. Defenses need to respect his shooting ability which opens avenues for his attack after their closeouts. He notices openings quickly to cut into vacant zones within the defense and all he needs is a sliver of room to finish. Lastly, he consistently crashes the glass creating second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

On defense, Edgecombe contributes positively as his athleticism, length, and effort put him in position to generate steals and contest shots regularly. He plays in a low stance, but his defensive footwork needs improvement as he reverts to a run-and-recover technique, challenging his ability to change directions. Fortunately, his acceleration and speed allow him to recover quickly to disrupt an attacker.

Edgecombe maintains consistent effort but is susceptible to ball and shot fakes. His over aggressiveness exposes himself to fouls or puts his teammates in a position to recover. His success creating deflections negates the impact of his aggressive play style. Strength and physicality are other areas on the defensive end where Edgecombe is exposed or challenged. He is willing to compete in the post after switches but needs to improve strength to enhance his effectiveness in the paint.

Off-ball, Edgecombe is prone to lapses but the errors reduced as the season progressed. He maintains his awareness and engagement, hustling to rotate and communicating while recovering. He finds opponents to boxout but as mentioned before, struggles against physical post players. When he secures defensive rebounds, it is a race to the rim that he usually wins or at the minimum draws contact to get to the free throw line.

4

Ace Bailey

202.8

Summary

Bailey presents as an offensive oriented three-level scoring wing who can create for himself or scoring off the ball as a shooting threat. Bailey is obviously very skilled as a ball handler and shot maker, but he is over reliant on his skill to convert difficult attempts. This tendency leads to poor shot selection and decreased efficiency. His defensive impact comes from his length, athleticism, and reactions to generate steals and out of position blocks. Overall, his defensive impact is limited and an area of continued growth.

Expectations

I expect Bailey to earn a regular role as a starter serving as a primary or secondary scorer. His overall impact will improve vastly if he demonstrates growth in his decision making and shot selection. He has the potential to become a high-level starter who regularly competes for All-Star nominations. The lack of growth demonstrated throughout his freshman season leads to my decreased confidence in him to achieve his ceiling grade.

Offensive Notes

Bailey showcases his offensive ability during each game. There are plays within a game where execution is jaw dropping. There are also plays within the same game where his decision making is head scratching. His offensive footwork is well developed and demonstrates a naturalistic quality to it. He executes his jab steps, ball fakes, and pivots as if he is demonstrating in a gym full of basketball campers and coaches. Yet, when it comes to utilizing his skillset in a game situation, he finds himself settling for difficult midrange jumpers or step back threes. He creates opportunities but fails to exploit them. I watch him wanting him to execute one more dribble or one more pivot to increase the quality of his shot attempt or get to the free throw line only to be disappointed. He demonstrates the ability to play off two feet, but he is quick to stop and elevate for a contested shot.

Ball handling is also very impressive and at times, maddening. He handles the ball like a guard while standing at the height of a front court player. It’s an imposing combination, but he fails to translate his ability into efficient production. He changes directions well and sets up his defenders easily but if pressured, he is prone to turnovers. At times, he trusts his ball handling ability too much and will attempt to dribble through traffic exposing the ball for turnovers. His ball handling is more effective during isolation situations as opposed to utilizing ball screens. The presence of additional defenders affects his effectiveness. For a player who has great size, skill, and usage, his free throw rate is concernedly low. The lack of free throw production speaks to his propensity to defer to jump shots versus attacking the rim.

Another promising part of Bailey’s game is his shooting ability. He has a beautiful stroke with a lightning quick and high release point. He gets his shot off easily both off the dribble and off the catch. Due to his high and quick release point, he is not impacted by defenders. Unfortunately, his ability to get his shot off leads to him attempting difficult shot attempts, decreasing his overall efficiency. For a player with a beautiful shooting stroke, it is surprising to see him converting 69.2% of his free throw attempts during his freshman season.

Off-ball, Bailey spaces the floor well. He is a promising catch and shoot threat who possesses NBA range. He also demonstrates good movement off-ball to cut for easy finishes. His athleticism and length allow him to play above the rim to convert lob attempts. His activity on the offensive glass is present but not overly inspiring. He is a transition threat after securing rebounds, but questionable decision making may reduce his effectiveness.

Defensive Notes

On defense, Bailey’s length and athleticism play to his advantage. He keeps his arms active and engaged to generate deflections for transition opportunities. He flashes sound defensive footwork while guarding the ball, but his effort and consistency are areas of improvement. He influences attackers with his size and athleticism more so than his effort and execution. He has difficulty navigating screens, often reacting a step slow which creates an attacking avenue for his opponents.

Off-ball, Bailey needs to improve his defensive awareness and engagement. He is prone to lapses resulting in him being late during rotations or closeouts or being beaten on backdoors. Fortunately, his athletic ability covers for his lapses and allows him to recover quickly to contest shot attempts. He hustles back in transition to challenge shots at the rim to swing momentum of games. He also looks for highlight blocks rotating from the weak side. Bailey needs to improve his strength to increase his effectiveness while boxing out and competing in the post.

5

Derik Queen

247.8

Summary

Queen presents as an offensive oriented front court player capable of creating for himself and others from the low post, high post, and the perimeter. Queen is very skilled and demonstrates well developed footwork, ball handling, and low post finishing ability. His court vision and offensive awareness allow him to create for himself and others after drawing additional defenders. On defense, he flashes on-ball guarding ability in the post and on the perimeter, but consistency and effort are areas that are lacking, neutralizing his overall defensive impact.

Expectations

I expect Queen to earn a regular role as a starter tasked with scoring and creation responsibilities. His overall contributions and effectiveness will grow as his defensive effort and offensive spacing develop. Those areas of development will determine his ability to grow into a long-term starter capable of competing for All-Star nominations. Queen’s offensive development during his freshman season was substantial, but his defensive effort and contributions did not grow at the same rate leading to my skepticism for him to reach the extent of his ceiling.

Offensive Notes

Queen plays with poise and control. His offensive footwork is very advanced and leads to the difficulty defenders experience while trying to contain him. He sets up his drive with shot fakes, pass fakes, and jab steps. He is a capable finisher and ball handler using either hand keeping defenders off-balance. Once a defender exposes an area of attack, Queen uses a long first step to get defenders on his hip. Although he lacks explosiveness and quickness, Queen plays off two feet with composure and balance. He is the type of player who is open even while guarded as he can create space using an array of pivots and ball fakes. He demonstrates the ability to convert hook shots, up and under attempts, and fadeaway shots over either shoulder.

He couples his advanced footwork with impressive ball handling that allows him to change directions and take advantage of reaching defenders. It’s this skill that allows him to create offense from the perimeter without top level athleticism. Queen is an unselfish scorer who reads defenses well and readily passes to his teammates. His passes can go array lacking accuracy leading to unfortunate turnovers.

Queen’s flashed three-level scoring ability but his shot is inefficient at this time from the midrange and beyond the arc. If he develops his shooting ability, a difficult cover will become even more challenging for the opposition. His shooting potential gives him the ability to provide spacing for his team, but his overall off-ball contributions are lacking.

Consistent effort and engagement were poor throughout the season and without the ball in his hands, his impact was diminished. Off-ball he is more engaged when setting screens where he threatens as a roll or pop threat. Fortunately, he stays ready with soft hands allowing him to catch dump offs and finish near the rim. He contributes on the offensive glass but his rebounding and putback ability are results of positioning versus effort.

Defensive Notes

Queen flash’s defensive ability and overall contributed positively during his freshman season for his team generating steals and blocks on a regular basis. His deflections were a result of his instincts, quick accurate hands versus drivers, and verticality while challenging shot attempts near the rim. Queen may sit down in a low stance and maintain width while sliding his feet laterally to cut off attackers, but when he decides to play with this kind of effort is anyone’s guess. He’s flashed the ability to switch on the perimeter and hold his own but other times; he’s been absent forcing his teammates to recover.

In the post, Queen’s effort and physicality are spotty. He can hold his ground playing with leverage but defaults to leaning on the post player resulting in losses of balance versus a low post move. Against screens, Queen offers variable defensive coverage but how he will execute is a mystery.

Off-ball, Queen will lose his focus, awareness, and attention leading to him being out of position to help or boxout. His defensive positioning is poor and is late to recover at the rim or on the perimeter. Although he generated a high number of rebounds, his rebounds were opportunistic in nature. Unfortunately, he would routinely fail to find a body to boxout relying on his length and size to secure rebounds. After securing rebounds, Queen is a capable outlet passer or ball handler to lead transition opportunities.

6

Khaman Maluach

252.8

Summary

Maluach presents as an above the rim center utilizing his size, effort, and athleticism to finish and protect the paint. Maluach lacks basketball experience and needs further development to improve his rebounding and defensive positioning, low post footwork, finishing ability, and shooting efficiency. Maluach consistently hustles and plays with great effort when he is on the floor. His effort makes up for his weaknesses to impact the game positively on the offensive and defensive end. He is an imposing lob threat and enforcing rim protector who flashes instances that suggest promising development.

Expectations

I expect Maluach to earn a regular role as a starter impacting the game positively on both ends of the floor. Maluach is a supplemental player at this point contributing to the flow of the game, but with development, his offensive responsibilities should grow and his defensive impact will affect his opponents game plans. Learning how to maximize his size and abilities will allow him to create shots for himself, stretch the defense from the perimeter, secure a higher number of rebounds, and affect the opponent's offensive actions. His ceiling projects as a long-term starter competing for All-Star nominations. I don’t question his effort or desire to reach that level as his barriers at this point are related to basketball awareness and aggressiveness.

Offensive Notes

Maluach is not asked to create offense for himself or for his teammates. In his limited opportunities to create a shot on the block, his footwork execution benefits from further training. He demonstrates great drop steps and pivots, but they are flashes rather than routine. He is a capable finisher using either hand but lacks touch during his self- created attempts. His high field goal percentage is more attributed to his dunks and putbacks than from his self-generated looks. His footwork and ball protection from the perimeter is another area of growth. He has been tasked to execute DHOs from beyond the arc but doesn’t consistently pin the ball or pivot appropriately to create space for himself or his teammate.

Ball handling is not a strength of Maluach nor does it need to be. His ball handling development at this point should focus on post up or face up opportunities in the low and high post. The next focus should center around handling the ball on the perimeter while executing DHOs. Lastly, if he has perfected the precipitating ball handling skills mentioned above, progress to dribbling on the perimeter although that does not portend as a prerequisite skill, he needs to be successful.

Shooting is also an area of development. Floor spacing from the midrange and three- point line are within his capabilities, but he is inefficient taking such attempts currently. His shooting stroke is promising as he has a sound follow through and shot trajectory. Stretching the floor will add to his value, but other areas, in my opinion, are more critical to his initial development and success at this time.

Lastly, off-ball is where Maluach really shines. He is a strong screen setter who positions his body well to affect the on-ball defender. He pivots well and stays ready to receive the ball on a lob. His great reach, length, and athleticism allow him to finish dunks that are unattainable for many of his opponents. When he is not setting screens, he stays engaged and ready for a lob pass after any of his teammates drive to the basket. He is active on the offensive glass but needs to improve his positioning and ability to read the ball off the rim. There are too many games where he is neutralized from creating second chance opportunities when that should be a great advantage for him. It is not for a lack of effort and hustle as Maluach consistently crashes the glass and runs the floor hard in transition.

Defensive Notes

Maluach is an imposing rim protector. His length, height, and athleticism make it difficult for opponents to finish near the rim. He demonstrates sound footwork, but overall footspeed is lacking. What he lacks in footspeed he makes up with effort and length. Maluach has enough athleticism to guard on the perimeter but as expected, changing directions is challenging and can be exposed by quick skilled ball handlers. He offers variable screen coverage ability as he is not limited to drop coverage. He is effective at hedging, trapping, and switching keeping his arms active and effort levels high.

On the block, Maluach will guard with physicality. At times, he leans versus sitting low, throwing off his balance against skilled post players. He possesses discipline as he is not over reactive to ball fakes or pivots and maintains his verticality while contesting.

Off-ball, Maluach stays aware to help from the weak side seeking a momentum swinging block. Unfortunately, he positions himself inappropriately giving up dump off passes or offensive rebounds. Like the rebounding comment during the offensive section, Maluach’s rebounding rate is lower than expected due to positioning and reading the ball off the rim rather than due to his effort.

7

Ben Saraf

206*

Summary

Saraf presents as a playmaking ball handling guard who initiates and runs the offense to create for himself and his teammates. Saraf has good size and feel for the game. He is an excellent ball handler coupled with fundamental footwork. He is difficult to contain and draws additional defenders often. He struggles with efficiency and ball security as these are areas of development to improve his impact on the offensive end. Defensively, he has good size and lateral ability to defend different positions. He demonstrates good anticipation and generates steals at a decent rate using his accurate hands. He needs to improve his strength and defensive discipline to increase his effectiveness on the defensive end.

Expectations

I expect Saraf to earn a regular role as a starter initiating the offense to create quality looks for himself and his teammates. He is a skilled ball handler who threatens the defense from all three-levels albeit at an inefficient rate currently. He can play either guard position, but his abilities are best utilized in an on-ball role where he can break down the defense to create openings. On the defensive end, he has good size and energy to complement the defense, but he is prone to errors as he needs to improve his defensive discipline. If Saraf improves his shooting efficiency, reduces his turnovers, and becomes more disciplined on the defensive end, he can progress to All-Star potential.

Offensive Notes

immediately on edge as all moves, angles, and shot attempts are at play. He utilizes either pivot foot and incorporates shot fakes, pass fakes, jab steps, and pivots to create space. He is difficult to contain and that is before he attempts a dribble. He has a quick first step to take advantage of an opening. Saraf lacks elite athleticism to blow by uninterrupted to the rim. To accommodate this, he is well adapted at playing off two feet.

As a ball handler, Saraf is shifty and dynamic. He handles the ball equally well with either hand. He sequences dribble moves together effortlessly to create an opening. He changes speeds and directions well with the ball. He is a confident ball handler and at times attempts to maintain his dribble within congestion. This exposes him to turnovers, and he needs to improve his ball security to reach his potential at the next level. He gathers the ball quickly into his shooting motion or for a pass from a variety of dribble moves. He is unselfish and keeps his eyes up while attacking to find his teammates.

Saraf has a quick consistent shooting form. His overall efficiency is below average, and he will benefit from continued improvement to warrant high usage. His three-point shot needs the most improvement. He is more efficient from the midrange and often settles for these attempts due to his limited athleticism and length. He is a capable finisher using either hand near the rim but relies on finesse over power in the lane.

Off-ball, Saraf presents as a floor spacing catch and shoot threat, but he needs to improve his efficiency to warrant defensive attention. He moves well without the ball, but he is most effective initiating the offense as an on-ball playmaker. He is willing to contribute on the offensive glass, but he plays on the perimeter.

Defensive Notes

Saraf is an average defender. His contributions on the offensive end will make up for any defensive deficiencies he may possess. Overall, he has good size and agile feet to change directions well. His size allows him to match up versus multiple positions. He has good anticipation to generate deflections and steal opportunities.

On-ball, Saraf is effective but shouldn’t be considered a lockdown defender. He has good size and lateral agility to keep up with ball handlers to contest their attempts. His glaring weakness is his lack of discipline. He is reactive to ball fakes and dribble moves which creates areas for the opposition to attack. If he maintains his discipline, his effectiveness on the defensive end will greatly improve.

Off-ball, Saraf struggles with his discipline and awareness as well. He may drift too far from his responsibility leaving them open for a three or causing him to closeout aggressively to recover from his defensive lapse. He is a gambler on defense who keeps his hands active and looks to jump passing lanes. His effectiveness on the defensive end depends on his awareness and discipline. If he improves upon those aspects, he can complement a defense nicely.

8

Kasparas Jakucionis

193.4

Summary

Jakucionis presents as a primary ball handling playmaking guard who initiates the offense to create for himself and his teammates. He is very skilled with good size possessing sound fundamentals, advanced ball handling, facilitation skills, and three- level scoring capabilities. His court vision and anticipation allow him to see openings that are otherwise missed, but as a result, he has a propensity to turn the ball over. On defense, Jakucionis plays with sound technique and good effort but gambles often putting himself out of position or into foul trouble. These are areas of further development to achieve and maintain a consistent role at the next level.

Expectations

I expect Jakucionis to earn a regular role as a starter initiating the offense to create quality looks for himself and his teammates. His effectiveness on the offensive side of the ball is dependent on his ability to protect the ball and increase his shooting efficiency. He has a flashy style to his game which adds to his allure but leads to questionable decision making. I expect his decision making to improve and if so, he can become a consistent starter competing for All-Star nominations. His value is tied to his offensive upside but his defensive contributions project to a serviceable level if his discipline improves.

Offensive Notes

Jakucionis’ footwork is very advanced. He is smooth and balanced. He executes his footwork from the perimeter, mid post, and low post as if he was an instructional teacher. He sets his defenders up in each position to create an avenue for attack. He is deceptive and understands the nuances of footwork to create an advantage. His first step quickness is related to this ability. He also plays off two feet keeping his options available to create a shot for himself or find his teammates.

His ball handling adds to his creation ability. He is smooth and handles the ball very effectively on the perimeter, while setting up screens, weaving through traffic, during transition, and even in the post. He changes directions effortlessly keeping the ball in control while his defenders are off-balance. He trusts his ball handling ability and that leads to careless turnovers. Jakucionis effectively maintains his court vision and awareness to find his teammates. His ball handling ability allows him to deliver a pass at any time. He also maintains the same control while creating space for his shot. Jakucionis couples his ball handling ability with his deceptiveness to generate fouls at a high rate.

Jakucionis has great shooting form. He is a three-level scorer although his efficiency from the perimeter is below average. I expect his shooting efficiency to improve as his shot selection narrows. He can make shots off-balance, off the catch, or off the dribble, but attempts these shots at a high rate, decreasing his efficiency. He is a skilled finisher near the rim and able to convert attempts using either hand. Unfortunately, due to his limited athleticism and length, he relies on his skill, finesse, and deceptiveness to finish near the rim rather than exploding to finish over an opponent.

Off-ball, Jakucionis remains effective. He understands spacing and moves well without the ball. He is always a threat to catch and shoot but also cuts timely rather than parking on the perimeter. He uses off-ball screens well and is effective using curls or pin-downs to either elevate for his shot or attack the rim. He also crashes the glass to create second chance opportunities adding to his overall value.

Defensive Notes

Jakucionis demonstrates good effort and technique while playing defense. He plays in a low and wide stance. He is light on his feet and anticipates drives well to force his opponent to change directions. Unfortunately, he lacks composure and reaches in for steals often leading to consistent foul trouble. There were many games during his freshman season where his playing time was limited following careless fouls. He maintained the same aggressiveness even when returning to the game further restricting his playing time. When he relies on his defensive abilities without gambling for steals, he holds his own very well.

Due to his gambling nature, he is often out of position to navigate ball-screens. If anticipating the screen, he gets over it smoothly but most often, he is left trailing the action forcing his teammates to recover.

Off-ball, Jakucionis continues to rely on his anticipation to jump passing lanes. When he guesses correctly, he turns the deflections and steals he generates into transition opportunities. Unfortunately, this strategy puts his teammates in poor positions forcing them to help often. He is active on the glass and demonstrates the willingness to boxout to end defensive possessions. He is an immediate transition threat after securing a rebound.

9

Tre Johnson

190.4

Summary

Johnson presents as an offensive oriented guard predicated on scoring at a high rate and volume. Johnson is a three-level scorer who possesses advanced footwork, effective ball handling, and great shooting form and instincts to create quality attempts. He scores well out of isolation or off the ball actions but needs to improve his ability to create using ball-screens and facilitate for his teammates. Being limited to an isolation scorer puts a cap on his utility at the next level if he is not scoring efficiently. On defense, Johnson flashes ability to guard on-ball and off-ball but lacks consistently and effort to regularly impact the game in a positive manner.

Expectations

I expect Johnson to earn a regular role on a team playing >24 minutes a game either as a starter or scorer off the bench. His role and impact will be dictated by his ability to contribute to his team’s success outside of scoring alone. Johnson demonstrates the ability to contribute as a facilitator and an overall average to positive impact defender. If he expands his game to become multifaceted, he has the potential to become a consistent starter with All-Star potential.

Offensive Notes

Johnson’s footwork is very effective. He is skilled setting up his defenders from all three- levels utilizing jab steps and ball fakes. He creates advantages well and most of the time, he capitalizes on his advantages to create a quality look. He lands with balance and plays off two feet allowing him to elevate and shoot from all ranges or pivot to create an opening.

Johnson is also an advanced ball handler. He sequences multiple dribble moves together and is always a threat to create a quality attempt during isolation. His ball handling capability is not as effective using ball screens as extra defenders, pressure, and traffic decrease his rhythm. This challenge stems from his score first mentality. He maintains his focus on scoring which may force him into challenging shot attempts or careless turnovers. Johnson flashes court awareness and passing ability but does not execute consistently at a high degree. On a positive note, Johnson uses his ability to put pressure on the defense to generate fouls at a high rate for free throw attempts.

Johnson is a gifted shooter. He is a three-level scorer with easy NBA range. He gets his shot off quickly and obtains his balance before elevating from any spot on the court. He doesn’t need to be balanced to shoot effectively. He demonstrates the ability to make fadeaways, pull ups, and step back shots off the dribble, but also converts similar attempts off-ball around screens. Unfortunately, Johnson’s impressive ability to make difficult shots leads to a high number of difficult attempts which lowers his overall efficiency. For the quality of looks that Johnson can create, his offensive production should execute at a higher degree.

Off-ball, Johnson spaces the floor well. When the offense is centered around Johnson, his activity level is very high as he works hard to get open. If a play is not designed for him, he tends to park on the perimeter. This lack of attention and effort off-ball is concerning. He is also not very active on the glass.

Defensive Notes

Johnson’s defensive effort fluctuated throughout his freshman season. Some games he was engaged on- and off-ball. Other games, he was almost absent, being late to react or positioned poorly. When he is engaged, his defensive footwork and stance look formidable. He will apply pressure, generate havoc, and cutoff drives. When unengaged, his stance is high, his footwork is lazy, and his effort around screens is poor. It is frustrating to watch as he demonstrates the ability but lacks the consistency.

Off-ball, the defensive tendencies are the same. He can deny the ball and deflect passes by using his footwork and active arms. Or he can haphazardly trail his responsibility, gamble for deflection, and miss boxouts. These defensive tendencies give me pause regarding his upside and impact at the next level.

10

Egor Demin

199.2

Summary

Demin presents as a ball dominant facilitating guard with the size of a wing. Demin is a cerebral player demonstrating good instincts, court vision, footwork, and ball handling to create opportunities for his teammates. Unfortunately, Demin is not as effective as a scorer due to shooting deficiencies but demonstrates the potential for growth. On defense, Demin is better guarding on-ball versus off-ball currently due to fluctuating attention and discipline. His size, length, and instincts suggest positive potential related to his defensive ability.

Expectations

I expect Demin to fluctuate between starting and coming off the bench playing between 24-30 minutes a game. Regardless of how his playing time is utilized, his role will revolve around initiating the offense to create for his teammates. If Demin improves his shooting ability and defensive consistency, he has the potential to become a consistent starter and under the right circumstances, compete for an All-Star nomination. I lack the confidence to expect him to reach that ceiling, but I anticipate him having a sustained role at the NBA level.

Offensive Notes

Demin demonstrates quality footwork. He utilizes the triple threat well to create an advantage during isolations or while setting up a ball-screen. He lands with balance and plays off two feet to keep his options alive to create his own shot or more often, find a teammate for a quality attempt.

Demin possesses advanced ball handling and is comfortable dribbling through traffic. He changes directions well and easily gathers the ball to find his teammates at any location on the floor. If his teammates are open, regardless of where he is on the court, he has the capacity to find them. It’s very impressive and for the most part he anticipates rotations well to locate his teammates on time and in rhythm. Though he can be manipulated by a defense affecting his ball security. Demin has a flare for flash which is both exciting and worrisome as that also contributes to his high turnover rate. He is most dangerous handling the ball in transition where he can use his long strides and ball control to get into the lane for a finish or pass after drawing help.

Shooting is where Demin really struggles. His shooting form appears sound, but his shot trajectory is variable affecting his consistency. He lacks consistency from the midrange and three-point line whether off the dribble or off the catch. He is most skilled finishing near the rim. He generates quality attempts in the paint as he combines his ball handling with his striding ability to convert finesse finishes in the lane. He relies on finesse versus explosiveness as his athleticism prevents him from playing above the rim. He generates fouls at a decent rate while setting up and initiating his attack but does not generate enough pressure toward the rim to get to the free throw line.

Off-ball, Demin is not as effective as his floor spacing ability does not demand respect currently. He is willing to shoot which speaks to his confidence, but this is an area of development. If a better shot is available, he will swing the ball quickly and accurately. He moves well without the ball but is better initiating the offense currently. Demin also demonstrates the willingness to crash the glass and contribute in the paint. His size aids his ability to obtain offensive rebounds, and his patience allows him to create a quality look if an immediate defender is present.

Defensive Notes

Demin is better guarding the ball than defending off-ball currently. He has decent feet coupled with his good length and size to guard multiple positions. He navigates screens decently but needs to improve his consistency to restrict openings. He has the strength and size to guard on the block which allows him to switch during ball-screens.

Off-ball, Demin struggles with attention, discipline, and positioning. He demonstrates the ability to rotate but is late during rotations too often. If closing out, he lacks discipline either leaving his feet or allowing an easy drive. He gets caught around screens off-ball and demonstrates poor effort while boxing out. Demin’s defensive ability is much greater than what he showcased, and I expect his defensive engagement to increase at the NBA level. If so, he will earn and sustain a role to contribute regularly for his team.

11

Noa Essengue

194*

Summary

Essengue is a very athletic long wing who plays with high energy and above the rim ability. His length and athleticism are imposing. His strides allow him to cover ground effortlessly. He explodes off the ground to finish over opponents. He has great footwork, concentration, and touch while finishing near the rim. He runs the floor hard and is an active cutter. He spaces the floor as a catch and shoot threat although he needs to improve his efficiency. He is a limited self-creator but a willing facilitator if he draws help defenders. His defensive ability is top notch. He brings versatility, length, and athleticism. He plays with intense energy and creates plays on and off the ball. He needs to improve his strength to match up against stronger opponents, but he has a great frame to maintain his mobility as he gains weight.

Expectations

I expect Essengue to earn a consistent role playing between 22-28 minutes a game contributing as a complimentary piece within a lineup. He is a versatile player who can fit into varying lineups. Offensively, he will provide energy, floor spacing, screen setting, and be a transition threat with above the rim ability. He will score in the flow of the game without demanding touches. He is an unselfish player who will find his teammates after drawing help defenders. He needs to improve his perimeter shooting and self-creation ability to elevate his role at the next level. Defensively, he is a multi-positional defender who can fit within any lineup and any scheme. He will impact the game on-ball and off- ball on the defensive end using his length, athleticism, and effort. He needs to increase his strength to hold his own in the post. If Essengue expands his offensive game and increases his strength, he can turn himself into a consistent starter with All-Star potential.

Offensive Notes

Essengue has very solid footwork. He will benefit from additional development to improve his balance and reduce the episodes of shuffling during his attacks. But overall, his execution is impressive. He catches the ball on two feet and utilizes either pivot foot to take a big first step to get into the lane. After his first step, the defense is in trouble. His long strides allow him to cover ground in limited strides. He is balanced and agile while knifing through the lane. He mixes in spin moves when his pathway is blocked. He does all this while maintaining his court vision. He also demonstrates good footwork while posting up, but he is less effective as he needs to improve his strength.

His ball handling is average but effective. He is an efficient dribbler rather than a flashy one. He makes a single move and flows into his stride. Once he gets downhill, it’s almost a done deal.

As a shooter, Essengue threatens the defense from the perimeter. His shooting efficiency is below average, but it demonstrates potential. He has a high release point and smooth follow through. He is much more effective off the catch than off the dribble. And his rim finishing ability is top notch. He finishes above the rim easily but if he needs to, he demonstrates great agility, concentration, and length to convert acrobatic shots near the rim.

Off-ball, Essengue is a consistent contributor. He sets screens. He rolls hard to the rim. He offers floor spacing ability and always keeps his hands ready for the ball. He runs the floor well and maintains his activity on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Essengue is a versatile and effective defender. His length and athleticism stand out. He plays defense in a low and wide stance. He demonstrates great defensive footwork and active hands. He is light on his feet and covers ground quickly. He remains engaged and reacts quickly to generate deflections or protect the rim.

On-ball, Essengue is a multi-positional defender. He has the length, athleticism, and footspeed to defend on the perimeter. He is intense and difficult to get around. He defends with his feet to cut off driving angles. To top it off, he then generates turnovers with his active hands. He needs to improve his strength to effectively defend on the block, but he shows great potential.

Off-ball, Essengue is just as active and effective. He stays engaged and communicates with his teammates. He reads the actions well and positions himself appropriately to help and recover. His active and long arms allow him to generate deflections and protect the rim from the weak side. He covers ground quickly and consistently makes his presence felt. As noted earlier, he needs to improve his strength as this will increase his effectiveness while boxing out to secure defensive rebounds.

12

Carter Bryant

214.8

Summary

Bryant presents as a dynamic defending wing who possesses catch and shoot ability. Bryant has great length, strength, reaction ability, and lateral agility to effectively guard multiple positions. His defensive ability is his strength, but he also contributes offensively by spacing the floor as a catch and shoot threat. His offensive impact is limited currently as his ability to self-create is deficient. Outside of catch and shoot opportunities, Bryant contributes on offense using his energy to cut, compete for offensive rebounds, and run in transition.

Expectations

I expect Bryant to fluctuate between starting and coming off the bench playing between 22-28 minutes a game. His role at the next level will revolve around him guarding the opposing team’s primary or secondary scoring options to disrupt their rhythm. Offense will be a supplementary aspect of his game as his contributions will come as a floor spacer and energy wing. Bryant flashed creation ability, but this is an area of development that will elevate his game from strong rotational piece to sustained starter. Although his role was relatively limited during his freshman year, he routinely made an impact and gradually expanded his game and responsibilities. I feel confident he can reach his ceiling to become a feature starter on a competitive team.

Offensive Notes

Bryant needs to develop his offensive game. His footwork is decent, but execution is inconsistent. He is more effective utilizing his footwork from the perimeter in a triple threat position than playing off two feet or attempting to post up on the block. From a triple threat, he uses a big first step to gain an advantage but unfortunately has difficulty capitalizing on it. He attacks into traffic and struggles to control the ball or make the right decision.

His ball handling is like his footwork. It is decent but inconsistent, needing more development to fully utilize. He can make big dribble moves but ball security is reduced when he attempts to combine multiple moves together. At this point, Bryant is best suited as a direct line driver who can finish at the rim using his athleticism, length, and force. He is willing to pass after attacking, but he is prone to turnovers while attempting to gather the ball.

As a shooter, Bryant has great form. He has a quick and high release. He obtains his balance well before shooting and stays ready expecting a pass. He is not as effective shooting off the dribble and once again needs to develop that aspect of his game to counter aggressive closeouts. Bryant is a good finisher in the paint but needs to improve his touch and consistency around the rim.

Off-ball, Bryant plays with great energy. He crashes the offensive glass and runs hard in transition. Due to his athleticism and size, he is an imposing force when attacking the rim with a head of steam. He also spaces the floor well. He stays ready to shoot the three after a drive and kick. He understands the offensive system and spacing. He swings the ball quickly to take advantage of defensive rotations.

Defensive Notes

Bryant’s long-term contributions at the NBA level will stem from his defensive ability. His defense starts from his lower half as he consistently sits low in a defensive stance and uses fundamental footwork to change directions easily. He plays defense with his feet. He maintains his balance, changes directions well, and cuts off driving lanes. For a good-sized wing, he is light on his feet and demonstrates impressive foot speed. The combination of his defensive footwork and agility allows him to guard multiple positions effectively.

From the attributes listed above, his on-ball defense is impressive and disruptive. He affects ball handlers with his feet, but he generates deflections using his length. He is always a threat to strip a ball handler to initiate a transition opportunity. As good as he is during isolation situations, his ability to negotiate screens needs improvement. At times, he gets caught reacting late to screens affecting his ability to get over or under them. The ability to break up a ball-screen is evident, but he needs to improve his consistency. Due to his versatility as a defender, he offers various coverage options whether he is guarding the ball handler or the screener. He recovers well after hedging and switches smoothly to disrupt actions.

Bryant is also effective guarding in the post. He holds his ground after switching onto front court players. He uses his physicality and strength to challenge bigs attempting to back him down. Sometimes, he is caught leaning which disrupts his balance. In turn, this exposes him to low post moves. If he maintains his discipline, he contests with verticality and rotates to boxout quickly.

Bryant maintains the same intensity off-ball. He is on time during his rotations and stays aware to disrupt actions. He needs to improve his discipline while closing out, but I have confidence in his ability to correct upon his inconsistencies. He secures rebounds at a good rate and runs the floor extremely well turning defensive stops into offense.

13

Kon Knueppel

219

Summary

Knueppel presents as a complimentary dangerous shooting wing who lacks athleticism but plays with great court awareness and anticipation. Knueppel possesses sound fundamental footwork, ball handling, and shooting stroke that makes him reliable and easy to trust on-ball or off-ball on both ends of the floor. He is a very dangerous shooter who offers but is not limited to perimeter shooting and spacing. Knueppel lacks athleticism making it difficult for him to guard one-on-one, negotiate screens, and finish near the rim but he combats his deficiencies using his knowledge, feel, and anticipation.

Expectations

I expect Knueppel to earn a consistent role playing between 22-28 minutes a game contributing as a complimentary piece within a lineup. Due to his consistent and reliable nature, I anticipate that Knueppel will compete for a starting role and with the right pieces around him, sustain that role on a competitive team. He is a multi-faceted player capable of creating on-ball, running actions off-ball, and space the floor on the perimeter. He will have difficulty matching up athletically at the next level, but his effort, awareness, and anticipation will allow him to remain effective enough to stay on the court. Knueppel’s overall ceiling is capped due to his limited athleticism, but I would not be surprised if he becomes a quality starter for a prolonged period.

Offensive Notes

Knueppel is a sound basketball player. He maintains his balance and control, especially while executing his footwork. He utilizes either pivot foot. He executes his moves out of the triple threat while maintaining awareness of where all other nine players are located on the floor. He plays off two feet which allows him to create opportunities near the rim as he has difficulty finishing above shot blockers. He has an array of finishes to complement each of his pivots. He also maintains his court vision if his teammate flashes open from a cut or an extra defender is rotating to help.

As a ball handler, Knueppel is sound but lacks electricity. His moves are not flashy but they’re effective. He maintains control of the ball and typically uses his body, footwork, and appreciation of angles to get by his primary defender. He has difficulty sustaining the same effectiveness handling the ball against ball pressure. This is an area of growth within his game. Knueppel also demonstrates the ability to set-up and create offense using screens for himself or his teammates. He is unselfish and stays ready to find a lob threat on the roll.

Knueppel’s shooting stroke is textbook. He obtains his balance from the lower half, maintains a consistent release that is both high and quick. He is a three-level scorer who shoots effectively off the dribble and off the catch. He maintains his concentration and is rarely influenced by contests. Knueppel struggles to finish near the rim. He lacks athleticism and is reliant on craftiness and poise while playing off two feet to create an opening. Altogether, he is sufficient but needs to improve his ability to finish near the rim to reach his ceiling potential.

Off-ball, Knueppel is very effective. He moves well without the ball whether cutting or relocating to maintain space and find openings against the defense. He is a threat to elevate and shoot from any spot on the court. He anticipates and sees the floor well which allows him to counter aggressive closeouts. This is a valuable skill as he routinely faces aggressive closeouts due to his shooting ability. He also uses screens well off- ball. This allows him to threaten the defense around curls, staggers, and pin-downs. Lastly, Knueppel maintains great energy and activity. He regularly crashes the glass to create second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

Knueppel is a competitive player who consistently hustles on both ends of the court. He plays with sound defensive footwork but is primarily limited by his lack of athleticism, lateral agility, and foot speed. His effort is not enough to mask his athletic deficiencies.

On-ball, Knueppel anticipates where an attacker wants to drive and beats them to that spot forcing them to change directions. This ability coupled with his size and effort make his defense serviceable at the next level. Navigating screens is a challenge for him. He is a step slow getting over or under screens. This provides angles for attackers to get downhill.

He has similar difficulty navigating screens off-ball. This places him in recovery positions often and puts his teammates in a position to help. Once again, this is not for a lack of hustle. Knueppel constantly plays hard, battles in the post, and boxes out for rebounds. He is a consistent piece on a team defense. He is not a shutdown defender but a player who fits well within a defensive scheme to make offenses work hard to score.

14

Nique Clifford

219

Summary

Clifford presents as a complimentary guard or wing who contributes positively on offense and defense. Clifford is an older prospect whose role expanded during his time in college. He transitioned from a defensive stopper to an offensive initiator. He completed this transition while maintaining or improving on his efficiency. Clifford is a competitive player possessing good basketball awareness, fundamental footwork, great hustle, sufficient length, and quality shot making ability allowing him to fit into various lineups as needed.

Expectations

I expect Clifford to earn a consistent role playing between 22-28 minutes a game contributing as a complimentary and versatile piece within various lineups. Due to his versatility, fundamental playstyle, and quality court awareness, I expect Clifford to compete for a starting role and sustain that role for a prolonged period. Clifford is an older prospect who lacks imposing size, but his length and ability to contribute on both ends of the court add to his value. He is a complimentary three-level scorer. He demonstrates the ability to hold his own defensively versus guards and wings. His overall ceiling may be limited but his ability to impact the game is not.

Offensive Notes

Clifford executes with great fundamentals. His footwork is well-developed, and he demonstrates the ability to create from the perimeter and the post. He protects the ball well while creating an opening against his defender. He has a long first step which allows him to obtain an attacking angle against his opponent. He is not an explosive athlete but counters this deficiency by executing his footwork while playing off two feet. He maintains his balance and composure to create an opening or find his teammates to generate quality shots.

Clifford’s ball handling is sufficient. He is capable of dribbling against pressure and combining multiple moves to get his defender off-balance. He lacks quickness but maintains control while executing big crossover or spin moves. He gathers the ball well off the dribble which allows him to pass accurately or elevate for his shot. He generates offense attacking closeouts or isolating from the mid to low post.

He is a quality shooter who threatens the defense from all three-levels. He has a consistent high and quick release. He shoots confidently whether off the dribble or off the catch. Clifford obtains his balance which allows him to maintain his efficiency from all spots on the court. He has NBA range. He is a capable finisher using either hand but relies on finesse, strength, and concentration to finish near the rim due to his lack of explosiveness.

Off-ball, Clifford spaces the floor well. He remains engaged when he is not initiating the offense and relocates or cuts well to find openings versus the defense. He uses off-ball screens well. This allows him to create quality shots off curls, staggers, and pin-downs. His ability to set his feet quickly makes him a threat to shoot immediately after receiving the ball. Clifford plays with consistent energy and contributes on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Clifford’s defense was his calling card for the early portion of his career. He maintained his defensive output even as his offensive responsibilities grew. He maintained his defensive effectiveness by relying on his length, footwork, awareness, and hustled.

Clifford’s defense begins at his lower half. He sits low in a stance and moves his feet extremely well. He anticipates drives, allowing him to consistently cut off attackers. He maintains his balance and uses his flexible hips to change directions quickly.

While guarding the ball, Clifford is disruptive. He couples the attributes above with his long reach allowing him to generate steals and deflections at a quality rate. Unfortunately, Clifford lacks height. This presents a challenge while guarding taller wings or athletic post players. He has good strength to hold his ground on the block, but his presence is not as effectively felt versus taller and longer opponents.

Off-ball, Clifford remains engaged. He hustles to deny passes on the perimeter and is physical to deny passes in the post. He tends to gamble for steals, putting him out of position. This leads to late rotations, slow reactions around screens, and susceptibility to be beaten on backdoors. If Clifford maintains his discipline, these circumstances are easily diminished. He also competes on the glass to secure rebounds. He is a threat to push the ball in transition immediately after securing rebounds.

15

Jeremiah Fears

179.6

Summary

Fears presents as an electric, playmaking primary ball handler who initiates the offense. Fears is very athletic. He is dynamic, shifty, and explosive. Combining his athleticism with his ball handling makes him difficult for defenses to contain. This allows him to penetrate the paint, find teammates, and draw fouls. His shooting efficiency needs to improve from the field, but his free throw shooting suggests that is within his capability. Fears is also unselfish and a willing distributor but ball security is another area of development. On defense, Fears flashes defensive ability but lacks consistency, effort, and strength. This presents a possible detriment to his overall success.

Expectations

I expect Fears to earn a consistent role playing between 20-26 minutes a game contributing as an offensive initiator. Due to his deficiencies shooting, protecting the ball, and contributing positively on the defensive end, I expect Fears to begin his career as an offensive spark coming off the bench. In this role, Fears can utilize his ball handling, explosiveness, and shiftiness to create space for himself or penetrate the paint to create openings on the offensive end. He can lean on his strengths to push the ball in transition playing at an up-tempo pace. Fears is a young prospect and if he develops upon his weaknesses, he has the potential to progress to a consistent starter with All-Star potential.

Offensive Notes

Fears has effective footwork but generates most of his offense off the dribble. Regarding his footwork, he demonstrates the ability to penetrate and play off two feet but often relies on acrobatic or explosive finishes which in turn decreases his shooting efficiency and increases his turnover rate. Fears will benefit from incorporating more fundamental footwork while attacking to maintain his control in the paint and increase the difficulties defenses face while attempting to contain him.

Ball handling is an obvious strength of Fears. He handles the ball effortlessly. He manipulates the ball using either hand. He changes directions and speeds well to keep defenders off-balance as they attempt to contain his attack. This ability to handle the ball coupled with his athleticism allows him to generate fouls at an impressive rate. He maintains control of the ball in all types of situations. He is effective at setting up screens, attacking in transition, and navigating through traffic. He trusts his ball handling skills too much at times which leads to increased turnovers.

Fears is unselfish and a willing passer. He sees the floor well and consistently draws help from other defenders. Unfortunately, Fears' fast-paced explosive style leads to errant passes and turnovers.
As a shooter, Fears possesses a quality shooting stroke. He has NBA range and shoots confidently from all areas of the court. He creates space well for his shot, but his efficiency is below average. He shoots well from the free throw line, but he struggles from the field. This discrepancy between shooting efficiencies is likely due to shot selection rather than ability. Learning how to play under control will improve the quality of his shots while vastly improving his efficiency.

Fears is a dominant on-ball guard and as a result, less effective off-ball. He offers floor spacing ability but does not convert catch and shoot opportunities at a high enough rate to warrant serious attention. He is not asked to run actions off-ball, but he can execute. Lastly, he is not an active participant on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Defense is not a strength of Fears. He flashes his defensive ability but lacks consistency and regular engagement. When engaged, he can pester ball handlers by cutting off driving angles and disrupting their dribble with his activity, but this is not a common occurrence.

Too often he plays in a vertical stance reliant on his foot speed to make up for his improper technique. He has difficulty getting around screens and will reach for steals rather than move laterally which in turn, exposes him to fouls.

Off-ball, Fears has difficulty staying engaged. He will lose track of his responsibility watching the ball. This puts him out of position around screens, exposes him to backdoors, and places him late during rotations. He also lacks activity on the glass by infrequently locating a body to boxout. These inconsistencies hamper his defensive impact and inherently will reduce his playing time on the court.

16

Walter Clayton Jr.

199

Summary

Clayton Jr. presents as a dangerous shot making guard who is effective on- and off-ball. Clayton Jr. is very skilled. He plays with sound fundamentals and has a savviness to his game. He is a crafty player who is a threat to score from all three-levels. He is a constant threat to shoot from three and uses this gravitational pull to create openings for his attack. His role as an initiator grew throughout his collegiate career, but most impressively, his efficiency remained above average. He is a willing passer and sees the floor well. On-defense, Clayton Jr. moves well laterally and maintains sound footwork but is more reliant on his instincts and anticipation to remain effective. Unfortunately, he does not maintain his effort and engagement consistently. Overall, Clayton Jr. is an undersized guard which limits his overall ceiling.

Expectations

I expect Clayton Jr. to earn a consistent role playing between 20-24 minutes a game contributing primarily on the offensive side of the ball. He is effective on- and off-ball allowing him to match up with variable guard play at the NBA level. Clayton Jr. demonstrates the ability to hold his own on the defensive side of the ball and if he maintains his consistency, I expect his role and minutes to increase throughout his career. Clayton Jr.’s upside is relatively limited due to his size, length, and age but he possesses the ability to become a high minute rotational piece of a lineup for a prolonged period.

Offensive Notes

Clayton Jr. has great footwork and composure. He understands how a defender is playing against him. He sets his defender up with jab steps and ball fakes to expose an opening. He consistently creates advantages and does so before taking his first dribble. After attacking, he maintains his composure and balance to attack the next level of the defense. He plays off two feet and all options are available to him. He uses either foot or any directional pivot is within his capability. This makes it difficult for a defender to contain him in the lane. He maintains his court awareness to locate his teammates if they have a better opportunity to score than the one, he created for himself.

Clayton Jr. is a skilled ball handler. He manipulates the ball well. He stops well with the ball to pull up for a shot or change directions. He is balanced while executing escape or step back dribble moves. He sets up his screens well and remains within control while initiating the offense from a live dribble. He is not a quick dribbler and as a result may have difficulty against pressuring defenders. Pressure can speed up his normal methodical play to force him into a mistake.

As a shooter, Clayton Jr. is top tier. He shoots off-balance just as effectively as he shoots with his feet set. He has deep range and shoots with tremendous confidence. He stays shot ready and defenses must stay on alert ready to contest. This opens alleys for him to attack. It’s a dangerous combination that he utilizes extremely well. His effectiveness as a shooter remains high whether pulling up off the dribble or elevating off the catch. He is comfortable and effective in the midrange and demonstrates great concentration while finishing in the paint. Clayton Jr. is a strong guard who possesses great concentration and more explosiveness than he is credited. This combination allows him to finish effectively against shot blockers.

Off-ball, Clayton Jr. is just as dangerous. He runs through actions well and as mentioned prior, he is always ready to shoot. He relocates and cuts precisely, maintaining space on the court and exposing areas of weaknesses. He primarily threatens from the perimeter which lowers his activity on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Clayton Jr. is an effective but inconsistent defender. When he is engaged, he moves extremely well to cut off driving angles. He plays in a low stance, maintains his balance, and changes directions well. He anticipates where an attacker wants to drive and beats them to their spot. Unfortunately, this defensive intensity happens on his terms. He maintains this activity level for a good portion of the game, but his impact, role, and minutes will be greater if he does so consistently.

Due to Clayton Jr. 's size and length, he is limited against who he can effectively guard. He is best suited to defend against opposing guards or else he is easily shot over even when in a position to contest. He is willing to play with physicality in the post after switches, but too much exposure will be consequential.

Off-ball, Clayton Jr. can be out of position and late during rotations. He may over play ball denials exposing him to backdoors. These are occasional lapses, but problematic if they persist. He demonstrates the willingness to boxout and push the ball after securing defensive rebounds. Although his effort on the defensive glass is sporadic.

17

Will Riley

185.6

Summary

Riley presents as an offensive oriented three-level scoring wing who spaces the floor and scores during isolation situations. Riley is a dynamic scorer whose decision making improved as his freshman season progressed. He is an effective shooter with NBA range. He demonstrates above average footwork and ball handling coupled with quality size and length to generate productive offense at the next level. Defensively, Riley struggles to guard on the perimeter and in the post due to his thin frame and lack of footspeed. Although his defensive potential is limited, his effort coupled with his height and scoring ability should find him a role at the next level.

Expectations

I expect Riley to earn a regular reserve role off the bench as a primary scorer during his stretches on the floor. I project his playing team to vary between 16-24 minutes per game due to his defensive deficiencies. Riley’s role and decision making grew during his freshman season which coincided with increased production and impact. His effort was never lacking, and I trust that he will maintain the same effort level at the next level. If he continues to develop his offensive abilities while increasing his strength and defensive instincts, Riley has the potential to earn a role as a regular starter to serve as an effective complimentary scorer.

Offensive Notes

Riley’s footwork is well developed. He is a long wing who lacks quickness but uses his footwork and stride to create openings for his attack. At the beginning of the season, Riley lacked composure during his drives leading to turnovers and poor shot attempts. He always flashed the ability to play off two feet, but he lacked the timing and space to execute properly. Although further development is needed, he improved upon that timing and space to generate quality looks for himself and his teammates. Now, Riley needs to improve his ability to land with balance to maximize his effectiveness.

Riley is a skilled ball handler that lacks speed with the ball. He attacks with exaggerated moves versus quick moves. This plays to his strengths as a long wing who can stride through the lane in fewer steps and elevate for midrange jumpers. Riley can combine multiple dribbles moves but doing so increases the risk of a turnover at this time. The threat of his drive aids his ability to create space for his step back three. He is an unselfish player that readily looks to find his teammates. Ball control and balance are areas of development needed to improve his passing effectiveness.

Riley has a compact shooting stroke with a high release point. This allows him to get his shot off versus pressure effectively. He maintains his NBA range during spot-ups, off the catch, and off the dribble. Unfortunately, his follow through lacks consistency currently which affects the efficiency of his shot. This contributes to his below average free throw percentage. Due to his thin frame and lack of explosiveness, Riley is forced to finish with finesse around the rim. This inherently lowers his efficiency and decreases his free throw rate.

Off-ball, Riley provides floor spacing capabilities. He has a quick trigger but will also attack aggressively versus a closeout. He also moves well without the ball. He times his cuts well and utilizes screens to create space. Lastly, he routinely crashes the glass to create second chance opportunities. His effectiveness to obtain rebounds is subpar due to his lack of strength and physicality, but his effort is consistent.

Defensive Notes

Riley plays with good effort on the defensive end. Unfortunately, he is not very effective as a defender. His stance is high, and his footspeed/footwork are lacking. As a result, he is often targeted on defense. He is over reactive to ball fakes and has difficulty navigating screens. Involving Riley in a screen typically generates a quality shot for the opposition.

He hustles and attempts to contest but too often is out of position while guarding the ball. His length makes up for his deficiencies at times, but his teammates typically have a lot of pressure on them while he is on the floor. His lack of strength also affects his ability to guard in the post. He is routinely at a disadvantage and backed down easily.

Off-ball, Riley also struggles as he has difficulty getting over or under screens. This makes him a consistent target and neutralizes his offensive impact. Once again, he plays with great effort. He keeps his arms active, communicates, and crashes the glass, but his effectiveness currently is a net negative. I do believe in his ability to improve his strength and defensive anticipation which will make up for his athletic limitations.

18

Asa Newell

223.8

Summary

Newell presents as an athletic and long front court player who plays above the rim on the offensive and defensive end. Newell is a raw prospect who requires significant development to enhance his offensive contributions and increase his defensive consistencies and impact. His effectiveness comes from his size, length, and athleticism to finish in the paint and disrupt activity on the defensive end. At this point, Newell is most effective finishing from dump offs, lobs, putbacks, or transition opportunities. He demonstrates floor spacing ability but is inefficient currently. His self-creation is a work in progress as he is over reliant on finishing with his left hand and is at risk of turnovers when handling the ball on the perimeter. His defensive ability is noteworthy as he moves well and generates deflections, but his consistency, positioning, and effort need to improve.

Expectations

I expect Newell to earn a role coming off the bench as a reserve center within smaller lineups to generate energy on both sides of the ball. His minutes may vary depending on his opponents, playing between 16-24 minutes a game. Newell uses his athleticism and length well to finish and protect near the rim. Unfortunately, his contributions outside of this role are limited. This in turn, will limit his production and minutes at the next level. If Newell increases his offensive contribution ability by creating and converting from the perimeter as well as improve his defensive consistency, I envision Newell earning a role as a starter or featured reserve playing between 25-32 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Newell’s footwork is an area of improvement. He executes his low post, faceup, and perimeter footwork in flashes but lacks the instincts at this point to effectively create advantages. During isolation opportunities, Newell features finishes using his left hand. This reduces his offensive attack by making it easier for defenders to neutralize him.

His ball handling is also a work in progress. He can handle the ball on the perimeter but should not be trusted to create at this time. Driving into the paint, he uses his length, balance, and striding ability well to set-up his spin moves for his left-hand finish. His effectiveness will vastly improve if he develops this ability using his right hand.

Newell’s shooting ability is below average, but his willingness to shoot from the perimeter increased as his freshman season progressed. His shooting form looks promising, and I expect positive development to occur. Improving his shooting will increase his efficiency at the free throw line and allow him to present as a pick and pop threat. At this point, Newell is most effective finishing near the rim. He is best when he attacks the rim aggressively leaning into his length, strength, and athleticism. At times, he attempts shots in the paint using finesse. This strategy is inappropriate as he should lean into his athletic ability to increase his efficiency and generate more free throw attempts.

Off-ball, Newell spends a lot of time in the dunker’s spot waiting for lobs and putback opportunities. He will set screens but lacks consistency by slipping too often or leaning which exposes him to offensive fouls. When he rolls after a solid screen, he finishes lob passes with authority. As mentioned, Newell is active on the offensive glass looking for putback opportunities, but he is over reliant on his athleticism to high point rebounds versus using his physicality to obtain inside position. He can produce on the offensive glass at a higher level and doing so will vastly improve his outlook. Lastly, Newell is extremely dangerous in transition. He glides down the floor and keeps his hands ready for a pass.

Defensive Notes

Defensively, Newell shows flashes of potential. When he sits low in a stance, he moves well on the perimeter and makes life difficult for penetrators. Unfortunately, this is not a common occurrence. He will play too high and get caught leaning or reaching in to generate a steal. This inconsistent effort is what hampers his defensive utility.

Newell is a balanced athlete who changes directions and covers ground well. This allows him to offer variable screen coverage to fit within multiple defensive schemes. His long arms and lateral mobility make him effective hedging and recovering or trapping on the perimeter. On the block, Newell is willing to get physical but gets caught leaning on his opponent versus playing with leverage. This exposes Newell to low post moves where he is forced to recover from an unbalanced position.

Off-ball, Newell is caught out of position too often. He demonstrates the ability to regularly influence shots at the rim, but his presence is inconsistent due to his positioning and anticipation. This also affects his ability to secure defensive rebounds. He finds himself out of position to boxout which forces him to face guard. This increases his risk of fouling and decreases his ability to secure the ball. Improving upon this deficit will substantially increase his impact on the court.

19

Joan Beringer

237*

Summary

Beringer presents as a long athletic above the rim center who provides energy and rim protection. Beringer has great size with explosive athleticism. He covers ground and elevates quickly. This allows him to effortlessly play above the rim. Offensively, he is relatively limited as a finisher. He scores off lobs, cuts, in transition, and after securing offensive rebounds. He doesn’t space the floor, create for himself, or facilitate to his teammates as these are all areas of development. Defensively, he offers great range and rim protection ability. He is an imposing rim protector who covers ground well and is active on the glass. He can enhance his defensive impact by improving his defensive positioning and awareness.

Expectations

I expect Beringer to earn a role coming off the bench as a reserve center contributing as a rim finisher, rebounder, and impact defender. His minutes may be limited due to his overall diminished offensive contributions, but I expect him to earn up to 12-24 minutes a game. On the offensive end, he will contribute to a supplementary fashion. He will play off-ball as a screen setter, cutter, lob threat, transition threat, and offensive rebounder. To increase his role, he will need to expand his game to create for himself and his teammates. His offensive repertoire does not extend outside the restricted area as that is an area of development. Defensively, Beringer will be an impact rim protector. He will cover ground quickly and make the opposition think twice before attacking the lane. He offers versatility to defend on the perimeter but overall, he needs to improve his defensive positioning and awareness to increase his impact. If Beringer expands his offensive game while improving his defensive discipline, he can earn a role as a regular starter playing 25-32 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Beringer’s footwork is apparent, but he rarely utilizes it during a game. He depends on others to set up his offense and he rarely has an opportunity to showcase his abilities. Overall, his low post footwork and ability to pivot after setting screens looks promising for future aspirations.

Beringer does not handle the ball well and is prone to turnovers if he is asked to create from the perimeter. He is effective on limited dribbles and prefers to attack in a direct line drive towards the rim. He is agile enough to execute a step through move after gathering the ball off the dribble.

Shooting is not an area where Beringer threatens the defense. His range does not extend outside the midrange and even there, he needs further development to improve his efficiency. He impacts the game from the paint. He is a high-level finisher who converts his attempts at an impressive rate. He has above the rim ability. He elevates quickly and has great strength to finish through contact. He needs to develop his left hand to reach his full potential as a rim finisher.

Off-ball, Beringer is very effective as a screen and roller. He rolls or cuts to the basket with purpose expecting the ball to finish above the defense. He runs the floor well in transition and is very active on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Beringer is an impactful defender. He is tall, long, and athletic. He is agile and mobile to cover ground quickly and change directions effectively. He plays too upright at times which decreases his impact on the perimeter. He also needs to improve his discipline and defensive awareness to position himself more appropriately to impact plays at a higher rate.

On-ball, Beringer has good strength to hold his own on the block. He has great length to contest shots. He is a fluid athlete who demonstrates the ability to defend in space. His effectiveness depends on his defensive stance and technique. If he plays with proper fundamentals, his effectiveness is greater.

Off-ball, Beringer is a high-level rim protector. He plays above the rim and defenses need to be aware of his location when they attack the rim. He offers variable ball-screen coverage. He is mobile enough to hedge, trap, switch, or drop. At times, he struggles with his positioning and exposes an attacking angle that savvy guards can take advantage of. Beringer is active on the glass and regularly finds a body to boxout.

20

Adou Theiro

218.4

Summary

Thiero presents as a very athletic wing who will contribute as a complimentary piece on the offensive end while excelling as a multi-positional defender. Thiero is an explosive athlete. He glides down the floor and plays above the rim. His athletic ability increases his ability to finish in the paint as a slasher, cutter, or offensive rebounder. He has shown positive development as an offensive creator throughout his collegiate career but that will not be a featured part of his game. He offers floor spacing ability, but his efficiency is below average requiring further development. As a defender, Thiero’s combination of size, strength, and agility allow him to guard any player on the court. He is disruptive on- and off-ball making him valuable to any team.

Expectations

I expect Thiero to earn a role coming off the bench as a defensive stopper playing between 12-22 minutes a game. His minutes may vary based on his nightly offensive contributions where he plays more minutes when his shot is falling. He will contribute as a supplementary piece on the offensive side of the ball as an aggressive slasher and rim finisher. Defense will be Thiero’s calling card. He can guard multiple positions effectively. This increases his value to play within varying lineups. If Thiero improves his shooting efficiency, he can secure a role as a regular starter playing up to 30 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Thiero demonstrated great growth throughout his collegiate career. His footwork developed nicely and allows him to create utilizing his triple threat or after landing on two. He maintains his balance and the combination of his large first step with explosive quickness creates consistent advantages. The challenge he has revolves around converting upon the advantages he creates. Fortunately, his athleticism puts his defenders in poor positions leading to a high number of fouls. Generating fouls is a very strong trait of Thiero.

As a ball handler, his effectiveness is context related. In the open court during transition or on the empty side of the court after isolation, Thiero is quick to execute a move and get to the rim. Within traffic or while setting up screens, Thiero is not as effective.

Thiero's shooting efficiency gradually improved at the start of his collegiate career but regressed last season in a higher usage role. Thiero creates space well for his shot and elevates nicely to negate contests, but his trajectory and release are inconsistent. His shot profile is expansive. He demonstrates dribble pull ups, fadeaways, and step backs but as nice as the shots look, the conversion rate is poor. He is at his best near the rim where he can finish with authority. He is explosive, strong, and athletic. He finishes comfortably using either hand. He absorbs contact well and maintains his concentration to finish against shot blockers.

Off-ball, Thiero spaces the floor, but his three-point shot is not efficient enough currently to warrant respect. Fortunately, Thiero maintains his confidence and does not let misses affect him. He is better suited attacking after receiving the ball to take advantage of rotating defenders. His first step quickness rivals any other wing in the draft. Thiero also maintains great activity on the offensive glass and is a major threat to finish in transition.

Defensive Notes

Thiero demonstrates the qualities and attributes of a strong defender. His agility, strength, activity, physicality, length, and footwork allow him to guard effectively on- and off-ball. He is light on his feet and maintains the width in his stance allowing him to change directions easily.

On-ball, Thiero is capable of guarding on the perimeter or in the post. On the perimeter, he anticipates well to cut off drives and reacts quickly to recover against counter moves. His long arms remain active to obtain steals or deflect passes. He demonstrates great agility to get over or under screens but also has the strength to hold his own on the block.

Off-ball, Thiero maintains his awareness and remains ready to rotate. He helps and recovers well. He closes ground quickly to contest while maintaining his balance to guard against the drive. He elevates quickly and delivers momentum swinging blocks as a help defender. At times, he is overaggressive, putting himself out of position or exposing himself to fouls. Thiero will benefit from better discipline to improve upon his defensive effectiveness. His energy levels and physicality allow him to compete regularly on the glass to secure defensive rebounds.

21

Collin Murray-Boyles

239.2

Summary

Murray-Boyles presents as an undersized post player or strong wing who has limited athleticism. Overall, Murray-Boyles regularly produced at the collegiate level but is in between size and athleticism to fit comfortably into a standard lineup. His role at the next level is not well defined and coaching staffs will have to be creative to effectively play to his strengths. Murray-Boyles plays with intelligence and composure. His offensive ability is limited to paint finishing and facilitating. His defensive ability is reliant on his instincts, effort, and anticipation.

Expectations

I expect Murray-Boyles to earn a role as a quality reserve who plays between 12-22 minutes a game. He will lean on his basketball IQ and savviness to position himself appropriately when on the floor. At this point, his offense is limited due to his poor three- point efficiency. He needs to compete in the paint, cut, screen, and move the ball quickly on the offensive end to find and sustain a regular role. On the defensive end, he needs to utilize his active hands to disrupt actions, communicate, and compete on the glass. I am confident that Murray-Boyles will find a way to be effective while in the game, but I am unsure he can maintain that effectiveness during long stretches. If Murray-Boyles improves his shooting efficiency, his role can grow as the sixth or seventh man off the bench, but it is hard to envision him as a starter due to his physical limitations. Murray-Boyles may be a limited player, but he is a reliable player who can contribute to a limited role.

Offensive Notes

Murray-Boyles is comfortable utilizing his footwork from the perimeter, mid post, and low post. He uses ball fakes and jab steps effectively to create attacking opportunities. He plays off two feet to keep his options available after attacking into the paint. He is unselfish and maintains good court awareness to find his teammates on the floor.

As a ball handler, Murray-Boyles is effective without being flashy. He is fundamental at handling the ball on the perimeter and uses his body to shield off defenders. Unfortunately, he shows a strong preference attacking and finishing toward his left which makes him easier to neutralize. This forces Murray-Boyles into turnovers or low efficient shot attempts.

Shooting the ball is not his strength. He relies on his physicality to finish near the rim. He absorbs contact well and maintains his concentration to convert difficult attempts. As mentioned above, his tendency to prefer his left side decreases his overall effectiveness. His willingness to shoot threes increased from his freshman to sophomore year, but his efficiency remained low. His shot trajectory and accuracy are inconsistent. This is a primary area of growth to impact his value at the next level.

Off-ball, Murray-Boyles sets solid screens, repositions well, and maintains quality activity on the offensive glass. If he improves his catch and shoot ability, he will threaten a defense to a higher degree. At this point, defenses can play off him and guard against the drive.

Defensive Notes

Murray-Boyles was productive as a defender. He consistently generated steals, blocks, and deflections. He accomplished this using his basketball knowledge, instincts, and length. His footwork is sound, but his foot speed is deficient.

The lack of footspeed affects his ability to guard on the perimeter. He also lacks the size to guard effectively in the paint. This makes Murray-Boyles a difficult evaluation. He is taken advantage of by quicker perimeter players, and he is shot over against taller post players. These weaknesses lower his defensive utility at the next level.

Murray-Boyles is reliable when it comes to positioning off-ball. He understands personnel and will put himself in position to take away his opponent’s strengths. He will maintain active arms, communicate, and play with great effort to make up for his athletic and physical deficiencies. He will follow the game plan regarding pick and roll coverage. He is reliable in that capacity although slightly deficient in his execution. He will be on time during rotations and be in position to boxout on the glass.

22

Maxime Raynaud

236.8

Summary

Raynaud presents as an offensive oriented floor spacing center. He is a very skilled offensive player demonstrating sound footwork, quality ball handling, shooting ability, and basketball knowledge to create for himself or others from all areas of the court. Raynaud lacks athleticism and physicality, lowering his impact and versatility on the defensive end. His length and anticipation allow him to offer rim protection and disrupt passing lanes, but his lack of agility affects his ability to guard on the perimeter.

Expectations

I expect Raynaud to earn a role as a reserve center checking into the game to provide offensive contributions. His minutes may vary based on his opponent’s personnel as he may have difficulty holding his own against athletic lineups. Due to this, I expect his minutes to vary between 12-22 minutes a game. Raynaud will lean into his offensive abilities to create quality shots for himself or his teammates. He will rely on his defensive instincts and size to remain effective on the defensive end of the ball. I don’t anticipate much growth in the athletic aspect but if Raynaud can increase his offensive effectiveness and efficiency, he could earn a role as a high minute reserve or low minute starter playing between 24-30 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Raynaud's offensive ability is impressive, especially for a seven-footer. His footwork is very advanced. He executes fluidly from the perimeter, high post, and low post. He remains in control while setting up his moves and demonstrates the ability to attack in either direction. He is smart and deceptive. His shooting and finishing ability keep defenders off-balance, opening avenues for his attack.

Raynaud is a skillful ball handler. He can create offense from the perimeter off the dribble. He presents as a straight-line driver. He sets up his attack out of the triple threat. He uses his size well to protect the ball which reduces the risk of defenders stripping him.

He threatens the defense from the perimeter. He converted threes at a decent efficiency and maintained that efficiency while increasing his volume during this past season. Although he is best shooting out of triple threat or in catch and shoot situations, he has shot threes off the dribble. He abides by basketball analytics avoiding midrange shots. He is skilled in the post demonstrating the ability to convert with either hand over either shoulder. His high release point makes his hook-shot impossible to guard. He demonstrates an array of finishes near the rim and utilizes his footwork well to set-up his attempts.

Off-ball, Raynaud offers floor spacing capabilities. He has a high release point and good shooting trajectory. This allows him to present as a pick and pop threat after screening. Raynaud also rolls to the rim well and keeps his hands active for the pass. He remains composed after receiving the pass and makes sound decisions as a roller. He also uses his height and length to compete on the offensive glass. He relies on his size to obtain rebounds versus physicality.

Defensive Notes

Raynaud is a limited defender. He is challenged on the defensive end due to his athletic limitations. He lacks the foot speed and agility to guard on the perimeter. His footwork is appropriate, but his effectiveness is reduced.

On-ball, Raynaud is more effective on the block than he is on the perimeter. As discussed earlier, his athletic limitations affect his ability to match-up versus guards or wings after switching. In the post, Raynaud maintains his physicality and attempts to play with leverage, but overall strength and physicality may be exposed at the next level. He loses ground too easily but maintains his verticality while contesting.

Off-ball, Raynaud is limited guarding against screen actions. He attempts variable coverages but is exposed after switching and is slow to recover after hedging. He is most effective in drop coverage where he can protect the rim and communicate to his teammates. His defensive instincts and active hands allow him to deflect passes and actions off the ball. In regard to rebounding, Raynaud relies on his size and length to high point rebounds. He is willing to boxout and attempts to hold his own but has a difficult time sustaining his positioning.

23

Jase Richardson

178.4

Summary

Richardson presents as a two-way guard who contributes offensively in an off-ball role and maintains great effort on the defensive side of the ball. Richardson is a smart player who utilizes his strengths. He is a three-level scorer who shoots efficiently from the field. He moves well without the ball to find gaps against the defense. He sets up his attacks to finish with his left hand which limits his offensive utility. On the defensive end, Richardson is undersized but plays with great effort. He hustles and competes. He is a better on-ball defender than he is off-ball as he loses track of his responsibility. He follows the ball and action too often. He lacks size to guard larger opponents, but he is never intimidated while battling against larger opponents.

Expectations

I expect Richardson to earn a role as a quality reserve playing between 12-20 minutes a game. Off the bench, I foresee Richardson providing spacing and off-ball activity on the offensive end. On the defensive end, he will play within the scheme, and I expect his defensive discipline to improve, reducing his lapses that he was prone to making at the collegiate level. Richardson’s ceiling is lower than other prospects graded around him due to his size, left-handed dominant play style, and lack of primary guard play utilization that I project at the next level. I envision a long-term productive player who can serve as the sixth or seventh man off the bench playing up to 24-30 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Richardson’s game is well developed. He utilizes his footwork well. He sets up his attack using the triple threat. He has a good first step after receiving a pass off curls or stagger actions. He plays off two feet in the lane and maintains court vision while creating his own shot. During dead-ball situations, Richardson maintains his pivot foot well but is constantly searching for ways to finish toward his left hand.

Another impressive quality of Richardson’s is his ability to keep the ball alive. He will penetrate the paint and if cutoff, he remains composed to keep the offensive attack alive to find a quality shot attempt. He values the ball and consistently demonstrates impressive ball security. He is a skilled ball handler but most of his penetration and attacking actions come off screens or closeouts. His ability to create out of isolation is less effective which lowers his creation ability for himself and others.

As a shooter, Richardson is very effective. He elevates for his shot quickly. He has a consistent release that allows him to maintain his efficiency from all over the court. He is smooth while gathering the ball into his shot off the dribble. He is balanced and ready to shoot off the catch. In the paint, Richardson lacks length and explosiveness. This forced him to rely on finesse and creativity to finish near the rim. His left-handed preference also reduces his effectiveness in the lane as defenses can neutralize him by taking away his strength.

Off-ball, Richardson is very effective. He understands defensive positioning and anticipates rotations. This allows him to find soft spots to cut into or open areas on the perimeter to relocate to. He flows nicely without the ball. He also uses off-ball screens well to allow him to get open and create space for a shot or an attack. Most of the actions off-ball are designed to help him get downhill driving to his left. If he can develop his right hand, he will make his offensive impact more dynamic.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Richardson maintains high effort. He is engaged, maintains a low stance, and moves his feet well. He is quick on his feet which allows him to change directions smoothly.

He is an effective perimeter on-ball defender. He hustles and anticipates well to cut off driving lanes. He puts pressure on ball handlers using his feet. As a result of his defensive intensity and foot speed, he negotiates on-ball screens well. He is very aggressive and at times, over reactive to ball fakes. He plays with physicality versus larger opponents to deny post entry passes. Unfortunately, his lack of length and height affects his ability to contest against longer players.

Off-ball, Richardson is not as effective of a defender. It is not for a lack of effort, but more so, due to his propensity to watch the ball and offensive actions. This causes him to lose track of his responsibility. This exposes him to backdoors and decreases his effectiveness to get around off-ball screens. I expect Richardson to improve upon this weakness to maintain effectiveness on the defensive end. Lastly, Richardson competitiveness and physicality help him compete on the defensive glass. As a guard, he can be trusted to play hard and regularly boxout.

24

Thomas Sorber

262.8

Summary

Sorber presents as a developmental prospect who has the potential to impact the game on the offensive and defensive end. Offensively, he sets solid screens, has face-up and low post isolation ability, maintains great activity in the paint and on the offensive glass, and shows potential to space the floor. Defensively, Sorber remains engaged. He has great strength, length, and impressive agility to effectively guard on the perimeter and at the rim. Sorber’s scoring efficiency and defensive consistency need further development, but he regularly impacted the game during his freshman season, and I expect his impact to grow as he ages.

Expectations

I expect Sorber to earn a role as a quality reserve playing between 12-20 minutes a game. He has the size and athleticism to play either front court position which adds to his versatility to earn minutes. I expect Sorber to fit nicely into any lineup where he will provide energy on the glass, intensity on the defensive end, and sprinkle in scoring within the flow of the game. As his game continues to develop, I anticipate his offensive impact to grow. If Sorber can improve his ball security, scoring efficiency, and perimeter shooting, I envision Sorber competing for a starting role playing up to 22-28 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Sorber has great footwork that is well developed. He executes his footwork in the low post and on the perimeter. He finishes with either hand, making his low post footwork and pivot moves more effective during isolations. Sorber also demonstrates the ability to set up his moves from a faceup position. He is sound while setting up his drive using the triple threat. His footwork and power allow him to create space for his shots.

As a ball handler, Sorber is average. He handles the ball well in isolation, but too many dribbles expose himself to turnovers. In traffic or against a double team, Sorber has difficulty maintaining control of the ball. He struggles to gather the ball for a pass or shot, and this is an area of development. Although Sorber struggles to handle the ball, he has great hand strength and concentration to collect the ball and get a shot up or draw a foul.

Sorber's shooting stroke is sound. His efficiency as a shooter reduces significantly the further he gets away from the rim. He is undeterred by misses, and I expect his three-point ability to improve during his career. In the paint, he finishes with either hand. Altogether, he needs to improve his gather ability and balance before attempting shots in the paint to convert his post attempts at a higher rate.

Off-ball, Sorber plays with great activity. He hustles to set screens. He flips his hips well and keeps his hands ready for the pass. He battles for low post position and his effort on the block is relentless. His physicality in the paint adds to his effectiveness on the offensive glass. He fights hard for low post positioning to secure and convert second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

Sorber plays with great activity on the defensive end. He has good size, length, and agility to cover ground and change directions. He maintains his awareness while playing defense. This allows him to regularly disrupt offensive actions. Sorber plays with a wide base and low stance. He flips his hips quickly and is light on his feet.

On the perimeter, Sorber holds his own against switches. As any big is prone to exposure on the perimeter against quicker guards, Sorber is not immune, but his hustle and length aid his ability to remain effective. On the block, Sorber plays with great physicality. He holds his ground well and stays vertical while contesting.

Off-ball, Sorber maintains his awareness and his on time to help, rotate, and communicate. He offers variable coverage versus screens as he can drop, hedge, trap, or switch effectively. He works hard to prevent low post touches, and he immediately looks to boxout after shot attempts. He needs to improve his consistency while boxing out as he can initiate from an awkward angle which affects his ability to secure the rebound. Overall, Sorber is reliable, and his effectiveness should grow as he develops.

25

Nolan Traore

175

Summary

Traore presents as an athletic penetrating guard who uses his burst to get into the lane to create for himself or his teammates. Traore has good size. He is a skilled ball handler who threatens the defense from all three-levels, albeit at an inefficient rate. He uses his burst well to get into the lane, but he is reliant on his right hand which affects his ability to finish. He initiates the offense well especially while utilizing a ball-screen. He needs to improve his court awareness and ball security to reduce his turnovers during his
attacks. On the defensive end, Traore has good size and active hands, but struggles with his technique, footwork, and awareness. He is out of position often, putting a lot of pressure on his teammates to recover from his lapses.

Expectations

I expect Traore to earn a regular reserve guard role playing between 12-18 minutes a game. He plays either guard position but is better suited initiating the offense with the ball in his hand. He will be an aggressive penetrator looking to utilize ball-screens in the half court and push the ball quickly in transition. He will create for himself and others during his time on the court, but he needs to improve his efficiency and ball security to expand his role and responsibilities. On the defensive end, Traore needs considerable development. He offers the size and athleticism to contribute positively on the defensive end, but he struggles to make positive contributions currently. He is prone to poor technique, effort, and awareness. He also needs to increase his strength to hold his ground against switches or while boxing out. If Traore can improve his shooting efficiency, ball security, and defensive effort and production, he can earn a larger role coming in off the bench playing >24 minutes a game as the sixth or seventh man.

Offensive Notes

Traore has effective footwork but depends more on his change of speeds and flexibility to angle his body while getting by defenders. He demonstrates the ability to utilize the triple threat or play off two feet but doesn’t incorporate these aspects of his game enough. Instead, he relies on his striding ability and balance to step through traffic and finish near the rim. This lowers his rim finishing efficiency.

As a ball handler, Traore is very skilled. He is shifty and dynamic. He changes speeds and directions quickly with the ball. He is agile and flexible, allowing him to dip his shoulder to get under and by defenders on his way to the rim. If he has a clear path to the rim, he finishes well. If not, he is prone to turnovers or wild attempts. He sets-up and utilizes ball-screens well. He reads the defense appropriately to handle varying coverages. He is unselfish and delivers accurate passes back to his screeners if they are available. He is also very effective in the open court.

Traore is not a strong shooter currently, but he threatens the defense from all three- levels. He struggles with efficiency which is a major area of development to maximize his potential at the next level. He struggles to finish in the lane, but he also relies heavily on his right hand. He needs to develop and improve his confidence in his left hand to improve his effectiveness in the lane.

Off-ball, Traore keeps his hands ready to shoot. He spaces the floor well, but he needs to convert his threes at a higher rate to garner respect. He moves well without the ball and is willing to crash the glass to create second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Traore has a lot of areas of improvement. His size and athleticism work to his advantage. He is light on his feet and moves well. Unfortunately, his defensive stance is high, and he is delayed while reacting to actions around him. As a result, his defensive production is generally low, and this will limit his playing time at the next level if he doesn’t improve.

On-ball, Traore defends either guard position. He has the length to disrupt them and the footspeed to keep up on the perimeter. Overall, he remains ineffective. He is delayed reacting to their moves. He has difficulty negotiating screens and consistently finds himself in a trailing position attempting to recover. He also needs to improve his strength to hold his ground more effectively against switches.

Off-ball, Traore struggles to position himself appropriately. He lacks awareness and finds himself positioned too far to help and too far to recover. He keeps his hands active and when he is positioned correctly, he generates steals to quickly translate into a fast break opportunity. Unfortunately, these circumstances don’t occur very often. He demonstrates a willingness to boxout but once again, he needs to improve his strength to increase his effectiveness to secure defensive rebounds. After he secures a rebound, he immediately pushes the ball in transition to utilize one of his greatest strengths.

26

Noah Penda

241.8

Summary

Penda presents as a two-way complimentary physical wing who fits into varying lineups in whatever role is required. Penda has good size, strength, and awareness to complement any lineup. He is a limited creator but superb support player in an off-ball role. He offers floor spacing ability, he will pass within the flow of the offense, attack openings, cut, run in transition, and be active on the offensive glass. He needs to improve his shooting efficiency and his rim finishing ability, but he maintains solid production levels as is. Defensively, Penda is regularly engaged. He offers multi- positional defensive ability. He plays with great effort and hustle. He has sound defensive footwork and technique to move efficiently while defending opponents and navigating space. He keeps his hands active and generates deflections while offering rim protection. He is productive on the defensive glass but relies on tracking the ball off the rim versus locating a body to boxout.

Expectations

I expect Penda to earn a regular reserve role playing 12-18 minutes a game. He will be a quality support player who can fit into multiple lineups to fulfill various roles. Offensively, he is best utilized off-ball where he can space the floor, set screens, move the ball, cut to the basket, run in transition, and be active on the offensive glass. He will benefit from developing his perimeter shooting, rim finishing, and self-creation ability. Defensively, Penda will check in and defend whoever he needs to. He is versatile and effective. This will allow him to fit into varying lineups and make positive contributions on-ball and off-ball. If Penda can expand his offensive game while maintaining his defensive production, he can earn a regular rotational role playing between 24-30 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Penda has sound offensive footwork. He executes his triple threat well on the perimeter and plays off two feet while attacking. Although he is effective, he is not proficient, and he will benefit from ongoing development to improve his creation ability. He is most effective using his footwork in the low post. Unfortunately, his size doesn’t warrant a high number of low post isolation opportunities.

As a ball handler, Penda is average. He is an efficient dribbler that lacks flashiness. He executes his moves to create or attack space. He lacks the burst to blow by his defenders but that’s where he can play off two feet to finish against the second line of defense. He also maintains his court vision which allows him to find his teammates after drawing help defenders.

Penda is a decent shooter but there is still considerable room for improvement. His shooting release is good but variable. At times, he shoots with a flat trajectory and a long release that affects his efficiency. To fully compliment his role off-ball he will need to convert his catch and shoot opportunities at a higher rate. Penda is a physical player as opposed to an explosive one and this affects his ability to finish near the rim.

Off-ball, Penda offers floor spacing capabilities. As noted, he needs to improve his efficiency to maximize his impact. Either way, he also threatens the defense as a ball mover, cutter, transition threat, and offensive rebounder.

Defensive Notes

Penda is a very quality defender. He has good size and length to defend multiple positions. He plays with sound technique and footwork to maximize his abilities. He keeps his hands active and maintains his awareness to impact the game on-ball or off- ball.

Penda can defend against guards but overall lacks the foot speed and agility to keep up with quicker attackers on the perimeter. He will hold his own and hustle to be able to contest but he is at a consistent disadvantage. He will be more effective against wings where his technique, size, and length will make their lives difficult. He keeps his hands active and anticipates drives to cut them off. He plays with great strength to hold his ground versus post up attempts.

Off-ball, Penda maintains his awareness and engagement. He reads the offensive actions and reacts appropriately. He plays within the team concept and maintains his discipline. His active hands and long arms allow him to impact passing lanes and offer rim protection. He communicates and is on time during his defensive rotations. He produces on the defensive glass, but he is reliant on his positioning and ability to read the ball off the rim rather than locating a body to boxout. This tendency exposes him to offensive rebounds if he reads the ball incorrectly.

27

Hugo Gonzalez

207*

Summary

Gonzalez presents as a high energy physical wing who plays with great effort but lacks consistent offensive and defensive production. Gonzalez has a good strong frame. He has well developed footwork but lacks composure to create for himself. He can score from all three-levels but lacks efficiency to be considered a threat. Instead, he makes his presence felt by cutting, being active on the offensive glass, and running in transition. Defensively, Gonzalez has potential to be a multi-positional defender due to his size, strength, and athleticism but his production is generally low. He has poor awareness and delayed reactions. He hustles but his movements are inefficient on the court.

Expectations

I expect Gonzalez to earn a limited reserve role playing 10-18 minutes off the bench. He will be tasked with providing energy and physicality on the offensive and defensive end. Offensively, he will be a support player who provides contributions in an off-ball role. He will provide energy as a cutter, offensive rebounder, and transition threat. He threatens the defense from deep but lacks efficiency to warrant attention. Defensively, he will provide energy and effort, but he needs to vastly improve his defensive production to expand his role. He struggles to make an impact on the defensive end due to his decreased awareness and anticipation of the actions around him. If Gonzalez improves his shooting efficiency and self-creation ability while increasing his defensive production, he can earn a consistent role playing up to 24-30 minutes a game. He has a considerable way to go in terms of development to reach that ceiling.

Offensive Notes

Gonzalez has good footwork but hardly demonstrates it. He has played in a small role professionally which limits his opportunities. He has flashed ability but relies on his strength and explosiveness to get by his defenders. He will benefit from improving his poise and effectiveness out of the triple threat and while playing off two feet.

Gonzalez is a basic ball handler. He relies on big moves to explode into the lane rather than shifty moves to create space. He has a long stride to get by his defender but overall, presents as a limited self-creator currently.

Gonzalez has good shooting form. He demonstrates the ability to shoot off the dribble or off the catch but his efficiency from both circumstances is underwhelming. He also lacks finesse near the rim and relies on his strength and power to get his shot attempts up.

Off-ball, Gonzalez moves well to find soft spots and maintain spacing for his teammates. He needs to improve his three-point efficiency to demand more attention and respect from the perimeter. He is a strong cutter who is difficult to stop when he has momentum towards the rim. This also works to his advantage in the open floor. He plays with great energy and effort as demonstrated by his willingness to crash the glass.

Defensive Notes

On the defensive end, Gonzales' contributions are purely a projection. His production was low at the professional level but his size, strength, and athleticism suggest greater ability is within him. He has a high motor which plays to his advantage, but he is inefficient on the court in terms of his routes and positioning. He will also benefit from improving his defensive footwork and technique.

On-ball, Gonzales offers the ability to defend against guards and wings. He is active, athletic, and long enough to disrupt guards and strong enough to be physical against wings. Unfortunately, he is too reactive to ball fakes which creates openings for the opposition to attack. He hustles to recover but he will benefit from improved discipline.

Off-ball, Gonzales struggles to read the opposing teams’ offensive actions and position himself appropriately. He is positioned poorly to rotate during help and is too far to close out while recovering. He is late to react to off-ball actions, making him susceptible to back screens, staggers, pin-downs, and backdoors. On a positive note, his hustle and energy provide positive contributions on the defensive glass.

28

Danny Wolf

251.8

Summary

Wolf presents as an offensive oriented center who demonstrates the ability to create from all three-levels but lacks lateral mobility and agility to defend effectively. Wolf is a skilled ball handler who has a good feel for the game. He is unselfish, smart, and threatens the defense from all three-levels. Unfortunately, he is inefficient from the perimeter and struggles with ball security capping his effectiveness. On defense, Wolf generates a quality number of deflections. He has great size, length, and awareness to anticipate and position himself appropriately, but he lacks lateral agility and balance. This reduces his consistency and effectiveness on the defensive end.

Expectations

I expect Wolf to earn a reserve role playing between 10-18 minutes a game. His primary role will revolve around creating offense during short stints of playing time. Prolonged minutes will increase his exposure on the defensive end where he can be targeted regularly. He initiates the offense from the perimeter, high post, or low post. He will be involved in pick and roll scenarios as either the ball handler or the roller looking to generate quality shots. His defensive contributions will be limited. He will need to maximize his positioning due to athletic deficiencies to protect the rim and compete on the glass. I expect Wolf’s offensive efficiency and shooting to improve but I have less confidence in his defense due to his athletic limitations. That is why his ceiling caps off as a reserve player increasing his minutes to 20-26 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Wolf possesses sound fundamentals. He has well developed footwork from all levels and understands how to set-up his defenders to attack. He will not blow by any defender, but he uses his footwork and body well to shield off defenders from contesting his shots. All pivot moves are available within his arsenal. This provides him escape routes if he gets in trouble. Wolf plays under control, landing on two feet to keep his options available.

As a ball handler, Wolf is very skilled. Standing at seven-foot tall, he sequences moves together the way a guard would. His moves are big but lacks quickness. He can serve as the ball handler in pick and roll scenarios. He has difficulty protecting the ball against pressure or within traffic which exposes him to turnovers. Wolf sees the floor well. He’s unselfish, anticipates, and looks to distribute the ball to his teammates. His facilitation ability is impressive, but he is also prone to turnovers as he forces passes into tight areas.

Wolf threatens the defense from all three-levels, but his efficiency drops off significantly when he is on the perimeter. His shooting release is inconsistent and leads to wild misses from beyond the arc. His efficiency is not much better during catch and shoot scenarios versus off the dribble. He creates space well for his shots. He is a capable finisher using either hand. He has an array of finishing moves: hook shots, floaters, scoop shots, leaning fades, turnaround fades, and step back jumpers.

Off-ball, Wolf works hard to get low post positioning. He sets solid screens and offers rolling or popping ability. His three-point ability allows him to space the floor but does not threaten the defense at a high degree. He is active on the offensive glass and creates second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Wolf is very limited due to his athletic deficiencies. He remains engaged while playing defense, but his stance is high, and his feet are slow. He is off-balance and has difficulty changing directions.

On-ball, Wolf is more effective in the post than on the perimeter. He willingly plays with physicality and holds his own versus post up attempts. He remains vertical while contesting. On the perimeter, Wolf is often targeted. He has trouble moving his feet and finds himself in a trailing position often. He will hustle to recover but is exposed to fouling as he is often off-balance and reaching in.

Wolf has similar difficulties while guarding off-ball. His screen coverage is limited and best suited to play in drop coverage. If he switches, hedges, or attempts to trap, the defense will be exposed and forced to recover. Wolf uses his court awareness and length to his advantage while playing off-ball. This allows him to deflect passes and be in position to protect the rim. He also plays with good physicality. He boxes out and high points rebounds. He makes quick outlet passes but is also able to handle the ball himself to create transition opportunities.

29

Liam McNeeley

214.6

Summary

McNeeley presents as a floor spacing wing who is a limited defender. McNeeley is a dangerous shooter but has difficulty creating his own shot off the dribble and finishing near the rim due to decreased explosiveness. He is more effective spacing the floor, running actions off-ball, and cutting to create quality looks. Due to McNeeley’s deficient athleticism, he has difficulty defending on the perimeter. He plays with great effort but is at risk of being exposed if playing for long stretches.

Expectations

I expect McNeeley to earn a reserve role as a floor spacing wing playing between 10-18 minutes a game. He is best utilized off-ball where he spaces the floor or creates quality attempts running off pin-downs, curls, and staggers. McNeeley demonstrates the ability to self-create but his effectiveness is substantially reduced in this role. As a defender, he plays with great effort and is willing to get physical to rebound or guard in the paint. Unfortunately, he lacks lateral agility, footspeed, and balance to defend on the perimeter. If McNeeley improves his self-creation efficiency and limits his mistakes on defense, he could progress to a quality reserve playing between 20-24 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

McNeeley possesses good footwork. He uses his triple threat well to create space for his shot or obtain an angle to attack the rim. He lacks quickness. This makes it difficult for him to turn the corner to get to the rim, but he demonstrates the ability to play off two feet. This allows McNeeley to play under control and pivot into an open shot or find a teammate after drawing help.

As a ball handler, McNeeley is efficient but lacks high upside. His moves are effective but lack speed to accelerate past his defender. His lack of speed and deceptiveness decreases his ability to create space for his own shot. He typically plays under control and uses his ball fakes and savviness to draw fouls. He is an unselfish player who maintains his court awareness. He doesn’t regularly draw extra defenders, decreasing his effectiveness as a distributor.

He is a very effective shooter. He threatens the defense from the perimeter. He makes shots off the move. This allows him to generate offense without handling the ball to maximize his effectiveness. He is more effective from the perimeter than he is near the rim due to his deficient athleticism. McNeeley is a capable finisher using either hand but forced to convert difficult attempts around shot blockers since he is not able to elevate over them.

As mentioned above, McNeeley excels off the ball. He sets up and uses his screens well. He sets his feet quickly to obtain his balance before shooting. He has good court awareness knowing when to relocate and when to cut to create a quality attempt. He is active on the glass and a threat to pull up at any time in transition.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, McNeeley is limited. His stance is high, and his footwork is inconsistent. This combination makes it challenging for him to stop and change directions. He has trouble cutting off his responsibility and does not generate a high number of defensive deflections. Although he lacks athleticism, McNeeley constantly plays with great effort.

While guarding the ball, McNeeley is exposed versus quicker opponents. He has difficulty staying in front of them. This deficiency is also problematic while navigating screens. McNeeley is overactive to ball fakes and often exposed while guarding the ball.

Off-ball, McNeeley remains a work in progress. He hustles but has difficulty negotiating off-ball screens. He may over play and attempt to deny the ball exposing himself to a backdoor. He plays with great physicality. He locates bodies to boxout and competes hard to keep them away from the ball.

30

Rasheer Fleming

232.4

Summary

Fleming presents as a physical wing who offers physicality to produce in the paint and three-point potential to space the floor. Fleming is a raw prospect with great physical attributes. He has a great frame with good athleticism offering multi-positional versatility. His on-ball creation ability is limited due to deficient ball handling and footwork, so he is best suited scoring off the ball in the flow of the game as a rebounder, cutter, and floor spacer. On defense, Fleming has the athleticism to cover space well on the perimeter and the physicality to match up versus post players on the block. He generates a high number of deflections and is consistently active on the glass but needs to improve his discipline to enhance his impact.

Expectations

I expect Fleming to earn a reserve role playing between 10-18 minutes a game. He will provide energy off the bench fitting into varying lineups where he can match up against different opponents. Fleming will need to improve his offensive skill set to increase his effectiveness. At this point, he offers floor spacing ability as a catch and shoot threat or rim activity as a cutter and offensive rebounder. He is limited as a creator and facilitator, so he needs to convert his open attempts and create second chance opportunities to produce within his role. On defense, he will guard multiple positions. He needs to improve his defensive discipline to avoid foul trouble and his defensive anticipation to negotiate screens. His length, physicality, and athleticism will generate deflections, offer rim protection, and clean the glass. His offensive skill set lowers his ceiling, keeping him as a reserve player where he plays between 20-24 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Fleming has a rawness to his game. His footwork is inconsistent, and he has difficulty sequencing his steps or moves to take advantage of defenders. He has potential but lacks execution and timing both in the paint and on the perimeter.

His ball handling is also lacking. His moves lack tightness which exposes him to turnovers and reduces his ability to create shots for himself. He lacks control and finesse while attacking. He depends on his length and athleticism to get by his defender. He is a straight-line driver who covers ground in a few steps. He has an impressive step through move to get to the rim after attacking closeouts or running the floor in transition.

His shooting stroke is smooth and shows potential. At times his shooting release is elongated but he has a high release point to shoot over defenders. He is more effective shooting from a static position than off the move. This decreases his effectiveness to create shots for himself. His efficiency in the paint is impressive. He shines in the lane as he leans into his physicality and athleticism to finish above the rim.

Off-ball, Fleming offers floor spacing ability as a catch and shoot threat. He has a large body to set solid screens and offers roll or pop ability. He cuts well and is difficult to contain when he catches the ball on the move. He maintains great activity on the glass. He consistently crashes the paint, generating second chance opportunities. Lastly, he plays with great effort. He runs the floor well and presents as a transition threat.

Defensive Notes

On defense, Fleming shows potential. His frame and athleticism suggest defensive versatility, but he needs to improve his technique and consistency to maximize his effectiveness. He plays with great effort but can be caught in a high stance. His defensive footwork is inconsistent which affects his ability to change directions. For an athletic player, Fleming is caught recovering his balance often.

On-ball, Fleming is more effective guarding in the post than he is on the perimeter. Primarily due to his defensive technique versus his effort. He plays hard and constantly hustles but finds himself in a trailing position that exposes him to fouls. He lacks anticipation and this affects his ability to negotiate screens. His defensive strength comes from guarding in the post. He is very strong, and opponents have a hard time backing him down.

Off-ball, Fleming’s awareness and anticipation reduce his effectiveness. He is caught out of position or late during rotations. This forces him to hustle and recover, disrupting his balance. Due to delayed reactions, he has similar difficulty negotiating off-ball screens. He is better guarding the screen as the screen defender where he is imposing as a hedger or trapper. His long arms, athleticism, and activity allow him to disrupt passing lanes and offer off-ball rim protection from the weak side. Lastly, Fleming is very effective as a rebounder. He constantly finds bodies to boxout and holds his ground to secure rebounds.

31

Drake Powell

200.4

Summary

Powell presents as an energetic floor spacing wing whose defensive abilities are developmentally further along than his offensive abilities. Overall, Powell is a work in progress and needs to sharpen his game to contribute positively at the next level. At this point, his offensive contributions are limited to an off-ball role as a catch and shoot threat. Unfortunately, he struggles with confidence and passes on shots too often to effectively space the floor. He is extremely limited and deficient as a self-creator requiring additional time and training. Defensively, Powell has great length, agility, and athleticism to contribute positively as a multi-positional defender. He plays with great effort although his consistency and discipline requires ongoing work. Powell flashes the upside which made him a highly touted recruit, but I recommend him returning to college to progress his on-ball offensive ability.

Expectations

I expect Powell to eventually earn a reserve role playing between 10-16 minutes a game. I say eventually because I envision Powell spending the early portion of his career in the G League while he develops and expands his game. Early on, his contributions on the offensive end will revolve around providing energy and floor spacing. He will rely on his athleticism to slash and cut, run in transition, and be active on the offensive glass while being a floor spacing outlet. Defensively, Powell may match up against the opposing team's primary or secondary scoring option during his minutes. His minutes will be limited due to his offensive deficiencies. If Powell improves his on- ball creation, shooting confidence, and defensive consistencies, he has the potential to compete for a starter’s role playing 22-28 minutes a game. At this point, I lack confidence in him reaching that ceiling level.

Offensive Notes

Powell demonstrates sound footwork. His ability is present, but he lacks the instincts and awareness to utilize it effectively. He appears hesitant and unsure on the offensive end. This hesitation slows him down, neutralizing his strength of explosiveness and quickness.

As a ball handler, Powell is average. He executes dribble moves well but lacks composure and control against ball pressure. He has trouble leveraging his dribble moves to create and capitalize on advantages.

Powell’s shooting stroke is inconsistent. He has a smooth follow through and high release point but at times, his complete shooting motion is long and exaggerated. As a result, his shooting efficiency suffers. He is better shooting off the catch than off the dribble since he has difficulty creating space for his own shot. Unfortunately, he doesn’t always capitalize during catch and shoot situations since he hesitates to shoot. Lastly, his finishing ability near the rim should be better considering his size and athletic gifts.

Off-ball, Powell provides energy as a cutter, offensive rebounder, and transition threat. His length allows him to cover ground well, but his efficiency is lacking considering his size and athleticism. As mentioned earlier, his floor spacing ability appears promising, but his lack of confidence and hesitation greatly lowers his effectiveness.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Powell has a combination of defensive footwork, agility, footspeed, and length to be very effective. He maintains his engagement while guarding the ball. He uses his agility and anticipation well to negotiate on-ball screens.

While guarding the ball, Powell is very aggressive. He is disruptive as he slides his feet well to cut off attacking angles and uses his long arms to affect ball handlers. At times, he is overaggressive and reactive which exposes him to fouls but overall, he has a positive presence on the defensive end.

Off-ball, Powell needs more development. He is mostly engaged but has momentary lapses in his awareness and attention. As a result, he is out of position or late during rotations. He covers ground quickly and his long arms allow him to interfere with passing lanes. He is active on the glass and regularly finds opponents to boxout, although his effectiveness is inconsistent as he needs to improve his strength and positioning.

32

Hunter Sallis

181.4

Summary

Sallis presents as an off-ball guard who compliments the team on both sides of the ball. On offense, he provides spacing, movement, and creation. On defense, he offers consistency, effort, and activity. Offensively, Sallis has great fundamentals and plays under control. He creates space well for his shots but lacks athleticism to finish effectively near the rim. This forces Sallis to settle for perimeter shots from three and the midrange. This past season, he was asked to initiate the offense as the primary guard and his efficiency suffered. Defensively, Sallis maintains his fundamentals, has good length, and plays with effort and activity to remain effective. He is not a lockdown defender but a consistent one who will be in the right position and communicate regularly.

Expectations

I expect Sallis to earn a reserve role playing between 10-16 minutes a game. He will play as an off-ball guard who spaces the floor and creates within the flow of the game. He will complement the defense by guarding either guard position, but he should not be considered a lockdown defender. I anticipate that Sallis will lean into his cerebral playstyle to maintain his effectiveness on both ends of the court. On offense, he will provide spacing and use off-ball actions to create quality shot attempts. He creates for himself or others in limited opportunities when warranted. On defense, he will generate deflections, contest shots, boxout, and communicate to be a trusted asset in his limited minutes. His ceiling remains as a complimentary piece coming in off the bench but increasing his playing time to 20-24 minutes a game

Offensive Notes

Sallis has great fundamentals. His footwork is consistent and effective. He remains under control and understands how to create space or set up his defenders to create an opportunity. He plays off two feet extremely well and honestly needs to since he lacks elite athleticism to finish above the rim. He uses ball fakes and pivots well but misses opportunities to draw fouls. Sallis tends to over rely on his midrange shot.

As a ball handler, Sallis is solid but not explosive. He is methodical in setting up his moves and understands where and when to attack. He is not explosive and has trouble turning the corner. This forces him to play off two feet and be creative to get his shot up. He plays under control and maintains his court awareness but primarily looks to score rather than pass while attacking.

He is a solid shooter but should not be considered an elite one. He has great form and shoots from a balanced platform. He has a consistent follow through and makes shots off the dribble or off the catch. His shooting efficiency dropped this past season as he was asked to lead the offense as the primary guard. He is better playing in an off-ball role where he creates after movement or on an emptied side of the court. He has trouble finishing near the rim, and as a result, he settles for midrange fadeaways often.

Off-ball, Sallis is at his best. He offers floor spacing ability. He understands spacing and relocates or cuts appropriately to find soft spots against the defense. He sets up his off- ball screens well and dips his shoulder to turn sharply around pin-downs, curls, and staggers. Sallis is more efficient converting his shot attempts off-ball than on-ball.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Sallis is solid but not special. He plays with good footwork and disciplines. He sits low in his stance. He maintains his balance and anticipates well to cut off drives. His foot footspeed is average, but he gets the job done.

He defends either guard position but may have difficulty against larger wings. He remains engaged while guarding the ball and moves his feet well. He anticipates well which allows him to position himself nicely while negotiating screens. He may not generate steals, but he will be in position to contest. He will battle in the post but overall lacks strength to match up against physical opponents.

Off-ball, Sallis is reliable. He will be on time and in position during rotations. He will communicate with his teammates and understand the game plan. He utilizes his court awareness and anticipation to generate deflections and get around screens. He positions himself well to boxout and battle on the glass. Sallis does not excel at any of these techniques, but he is sufficient, making him a complimentary piece to the defense.

33

Cedric Coward

213

Summary

Coward presents as a long floor spacing wing who offers multi-positional defensive ability due to his size and length. Coward is an effective fundamental player. He has great length, footwork, shooting form, and striding ability to threaten the defense from all three-levels. He is efficient from all areas of the floor. He demonstrates the ability to attack off ball-screens, but he is most effective while isolating from the mid to lost post. He is unselfish on the offensive end which allows him to fit into variable lineups. Defensively, Coward relies on his length to make an impact. His long arms interrupt passing lanes and offer rim protection from a help position. His defensive footwork and footspeed are deficient. This challenges his ability to defend in space or get around ball- screens.

Expectations

I expect Coward to earn a role as a complimentary reserve wing playing 10-16 minutes a game. He will fit well into variable lineups as his offensive and defensive games compliment his teammates. Offensively, he is best suited to play in an off-ball role where he spaces the floor, cuts to the basket, runs in transition, and is active on the offensive glass. He maintains his effectiveness in a limited usage role. Under certain circumstances, he isolates from the mid to low post or uses ball-screens to initiate attacks. Defensively, he has multi-positional defensive ability. His footspeed and lateral agility will lower his effectiveness on the perimeter, so he is better suited to defend against opposing wings. He will provide energy and length to impact passes and contest shots from help positions. If Coward can improve his perimeter creation and his perimeter defensive, he can earn a larger role playing 24-30 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Coward has very sound footwork. He has long strides to step past his defenders from the triple threat. He is a strider who likes to knife through traffic rather than playing off two feet. His most effective footwork comes from the mid to low post. He is balanced and composed while creating space for his attack.

He is a limited ball handler. He is a methodical attacker versus a quick one when it comes to attacking off the dribble. He struggles to maintain the ball against pressure which lowers his effectiveness creating from the perimeter. Fortunately, he demonstrates comfort utilizing ball-screens. While attacking, Coward maintains his court vision and is unselfish to find his teammates.

Coward is a great shooter. He keeps the ball high after receiving passes to flow smoothly into his shooting motion. He has a quick and high release. He has a great follow through and rotation on his ball. Coward shoots well off the catch. He keeps his hands ready and sets his feet quickly to obtain his balance while shooting. He has great touch around the rim which makes him effective from the midrange and in the paint.

Off-ball, Coward is very effective. He is always a threat to shoot. He also moves well without the ball. He is a long striding slasher who is dangerous catching a pass with momentum toward the basket. Hs is also active on the glass and runs the floor well in transition.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Coward is effective in a team concept but should not be considered a lockdown isolation one. He has good size and length to make his presence felt on the defensive end. He maintains his engagement and covers ground well, but his overall footspeed and defensive footwork is deficient.

On-ball, Coward is exposed defending on the perimeter. His footspeed and lateral agility affect his ability to change directions. Quicker opponents can expose his deficiencies. Fortunately, Coward has good hustle and length to recover and contest. He also has difficulty getting around ball-screens. He is best suited defending against non-ball dominant opponents.

Off-ball, Coward’s length and striding ability allow him to cover ground and impact passing lanes. He generates deflections when he is positioned appropriately. He is also fearless while contesting at the rim. He contests vertically and offers great weak side help at the rim. Unfortunately, Coward has difficulty getting around screens and lacks awareness. This results in late rotations. Coward demonstrates a willingness to boxout and secure defensive rebounds. His length and leaping ability allow him to high point rebounds and push the ball in transition.

34

Tyrese Proctor

183.2

Summary

Proctor presents as a defensive minded floor spacing guard. Proctor’s ball handling, court awareness, and decision making are deficient making him better suited in an off- guard role versus on as a primary ball handler. This past season, Proctor shot the ball from three with increased confidence and efficiency. He struggles to create shots for himself and convert shots near the rim. This decreases his offensive utilization. As defender, Proctor plays with intensity. He maintains his intensity while utilizing sound defensive footwork and technique. He has decent size which allows him to defend either guard position. He also plays with physicality to intermittently guard wings.

Expectations

I expect Proctor to earn a reserve role as a defensive minded floor spacing off-ball guard playing between 10-16 minutes a game. Proctor is inefficient as a creator, and this caps his ceiling as he is limited to an off-ball role. He is a confident shooter from the perimeter and will add value as a floor spacing option. On the defensive end, Proctor will be asked to guard the opposing team’s primary scoring guard during his minutes. He will play with great effort and intensity to disrupt his opponent’s rhythm. If Proctor improves his on-ball abilities as a facilitator and shot maker, he can earn a larger role off the bench playing up to 12-22 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Proctor has effective footwork out of the triple threat. He maintains his balance. Either pivot foot is within his arsenal. Unfortunately, Proctor has difficulty capitalizing on the advantages he creates. When he is cut off, he plays off two feet. He generally looks to pass rather than shoot in these situations limiting his effectiveness.

Proctor is a good ball handler. He has an array of moves but doesn’t create quality looks after executing them. He struggles to anticipate the defensive rotations or recognize where help defenders are coming from. This causes him to dribble into traffic often. His court awareness is suspect and decreases his ability to create for himself or find his teammates.

Proctor’s shooting improved throughout his career. His confidence grew. Especially from beyond the arc. He obtains his balance well before shooting. He has repeatable form that is better off the catch than off the dribble. Proctor lacks high level athleticism and length to finish near the rim. He relies on finesse to get his shot attempts up. He struggles to finish inside the arc which decreases his overall offensive ability.

Off-ball is where Proctor is best utilized. He is a weapon as a floor spacer and demands attention from the opposing team. He has a quick release but still struggles with confidence as he is hesitant to shoot. Those hesitations reduced during his playing career. Overall, Proctor relocates well without the ball. He finds soft spots on the perimeter to benefit from a collapsing defense.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Proctor plays with great footwork and technique. He sits low in a stance. He maintains his wide stance while he cuts off driving angles. He maintains his balance and changes directions well. He has good instincts and keeps his hands active to disrupt the offense.

On-ball, Proctor plays with great intensity. He moves his feet and defends without fouling. He disrupts ball handlers by beating them to their spot. This ability and effort allow him to navigate screens effectively. He does this consistently and has the size to match up against either guard position. Proctor isn’t shy and will not hesitate to get physical after switches. He battles hard to deny passes and holds his ground in the post until help defenders arrive.

Off-ball, Proctor remains active and engaged. He consistently communicates. He is in position on rotations. He anticipates screens to get around them well. He uses his physicality while boxing out for defensive rebounds. He pushes the ball immediately after securing the ball.

35

Alex Toohey

222.8

Summary

Toohey presents as a dependable wing who offers energy on the glass, defensive deflections, and off-ball offensive movement and floor spacing. Toohey has good size and length. He is a methodical attacker who is most efficient attacking the rim as a straight-line driver either after a cut or after countering an aggressive closeout. Otherwise, his ability to create stems from his low to mid post footwork. Toohey provides floor spacing ability but needs to improve his shooting efficiency. He plays with good energy and actively contributes on the offensive glass. Toohey lacks lateral agility and quickness but is effective on the defensive end due to his length, anticipation, hustle, and active hands. Although he is at a disadvantage against quicker opponents, he is persistent and puts himself in a position to contest. He maintains active hands and generates an impressive number of deflections on and off the ball.

Expectations

I expect Toohey to earn a role as a reserve wing who provides positive energy playing between 10-14 minutes a game. Although his upside is limited, his outlook is positive. He features as a complementary role within varying lineups. Offensively, he is limited as a creator and relatively inefficient as a shooter, but he positions himself appropriately and actively cuts and crashes for offensive rebounds. On the defensive end, he will serve as a complimentary piece where he fits into different lineups. His size will allow him to match up against wings and smaller front court options. He should not be asked to guard the primary scorer or quicker opponents due to his lack of agility and quickness. But as a complimentary piece, he offers dependability, active hands, and energy on the glass. If Toohey improves his shooting efficiency, he can earn a role as a reserve wing playing up to 20-24 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Toohey’s footwork is more effective in the low and mid post than it is on the perimeter. He keeps his balance and understands how to use his pivots to create an opening. He also has an impressive step through move while attacking the rim to get by defenders after cutting, driving, or in transition.

Toohey’s ball handling is average. He is a methodical ball handler whose effectiveness reduces the more dribbles he attempts. He is best at attacking after a single move to get downhill. If he does not generate an advantage, it is best for him to swing the ball and keep the offense flowing.

His shooting form is sound, but his efficiency is below average. He struggles from all three-levels although he is willing to shoot from each of the areas on the court. He has difficulty creating space for his own shot, so he presents as a catch and shoot threat currently. Toohey attacks closeouts well and has good strength to absorb contact while attempting shots near the rim. Unfortunately, he lacks elevation to explode vertically over his opponents and relies on inefficient attempts.

Off-ball, Toohey will fit right into different offensive systems. He moves well without the ball to maintain spacing or find cutting lanes to get to the rim. As mentioned above, he offers floor spacing ability but needs to improve his shooting efficiency to maximize his effectiveness. On a positive note, he consistently crashes the glass to create second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

Toohey is an effective defender but lacks high end attributes to consider him an elite one. He plays with good effort, persistence, and energy to hold his own on the defensive end. He has good instincts and active hands to generate deflections at a decent rate. He communicates and maintains his awareness of the actions happening on the court.

Those attributes above cover for his athletic deficiencies. Overall, Toohey lacks lateral agility and quickness. He is exposed guarding the ball on the perimeter, especially against quicker opponents. He has good strength to play with physicality in the post, but he will require help while guarding his opponents one-on-one.

Off-ball, Toohey is more reliable. He positions himself well and communicates with his teammates. He has long arms and active hands to generate deflections or offer weakside rim protection. He is in position on rotations and willing to boxout for defensive rebounds. This suits Toohey as a complimentary piece on the defense rather than a primary defender of the opposition’s primary or secondary scoring threats.

36

Jamir Watkins

213

Summary

Watkins presents as a three and defensive wing who offers self-creation ability in addition to multi-positional defensive versatility. Watkins is an older prospect who has demonstrated consistent development throughout his career. This past season he was asked to initiate the offense as a primary ball handler which he performed admirably. He increased his usage while maintaining his typical efficiency, but the increased usage also resulted in more turnovers. He is a three-level scorer who is better at complimenting an offense than running the show. He needs to improve his shooting percentages to secure a consistent role at the next level. Defensively, Watkins has good instincts coupled with his length and defensive techniques to defend guards and wings. He is better on-ball than off-ball as his effort and engagement decreases away from the action. He also needs to improve his discipline as his aggressive nature places him in foul trouble.

Expectations

I expect Watkins to earn a role as a reserve wing playing between 10-14 minutes a game. Offensively, he will contribute as a floor spacer who can attack closeouts to create his own shot or shots for his teammates. He is better off-ball versus on-ball due to his ball security issues but he will fit nicely within different lineups. His size, length, and defensive technique allow him to defend multiple positions effectively. During his minutes, he will guard the opposing team’s primary or secondary scoring option. He disrupts their rhythm while generating deflections for transition opportunities. If Watkins improves his shooting efficiency, ball security, defensive discipline, and off-ball defensive effort, he can compete for a larger role off the bench playing up to 20-24 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Watkins has effective footwork depending on where he is on the floor. He is very effective from the triple threat and creates advantages well. He has a long first step to get into the lane. After that, he lacks consistency landing or playing off two feet. His effectiveness while attacking the next level depends on his ability to land with balance. If he is balanced, he is sharp and effective. Otherwise, he is wild which reduces his shooting efficiency and exposes himself to turnovers.

As a ball handler, Watkins is effective in a methodical way. He has big moves that compliment his striding ability to attack the second level of a defense. He has trouble creating against pressure. This also contributes to his high turnover rate. He has good court awareness and is an unselfish player. He consistently attacks with his eyes up looking to distribute to his teammates.

Watkins threatens the defense from all three-levels, but his shooting efficiency is below average. He demonstrates the ability to shoot off the catch or off the dribble which adds to his versatility. He struggles to finish in the paint and primarily lives on the perimeter from the midrange and three-point line. He seeks contact and is very good at drawing fouls.

Off-ball, Watkins is a catch and shoot threat. He moves well without the ball. He relocates to maintain spacing and cuts well when he sees openings. His effectiveness off-ball will drastically improve if he improves his shooting efficiency. He maintains his activity on the glass and swings the ball quickly during ball reversals.

Defensive Notes

Watkins is a very effective defender. He plays with sound defensive footwork and technique. He sits low in a wide defensive stance. He anticipates well, changes directions smoothly, and covers ground quickly. He has long arms that allow him to generate deflections on- and off-ball.

His defense is better on-ball than it is off-ball currently. He is more engaged and intense while guarding the ball. He offers the ability to defend guards and wings effectively. He anticipates well and beats them to their spots. He has great length to contest their shots. His engagement and low stance allow him to get around screens well. At times, Watkins is overaggressive which exposes him to foul trouble. He will benefit from tightening up his defensive discipline.

Off-ball, Watkins remains effective but is more prone to lapses. His engagement is reduced, and it is not evident on a singular possession basis but rather apparent while observing a game in entirety. His lack of engagement puts him out of position to close or rotate. But when he is in tune with his surroundings, his effectiveness is tremendous as he offers weakside blocks and steal potential. He is active on the glass but does not consistently seek contact while boxing out. This results in offensive rebounding opportunities for his opposition.

37

Bogoljub Markovic

213.2

Summary

Markovic presents as a long perimeter shot making wing or front court player who offers rim protection. Markovic has great size and length. He has put on muscle since the previous season but needs to increase his strength further. He is a skilled big man who attacks from the perimeter and spaces the floor. His creativity and aggressiveness are low. He is passive at times and does not take advantage of mismatches. On the defensive end, Markovic’s length is impactful. He disrupts passing lanes and offers rim protection. He moves relatively well but struggles to maintain his effort and court awareness to be properly positioned to make a consistent positive impact. He needs to increase his strength to defend against NBA sized post players and increase his production on the glass.

Expectations

I expect Markovic to earn a reserve role playing between 10-12 minutes a game. He is a skilled wing or front court player who threatens the defense from all three-levels. He will serve as a floor spacer, screen setter, and transition threat at the next level. He can self-create but he benefits from ongoing development to increase his confidence to utilize this aspect of his game. Defensively, his length is imposing. He moves relatively well for a tall player, but he lacks consistent effort. He will contribute positively on the defensive end where he uses his length and mobility to impact passing lanes and offer rim protection. He is prone to defensive lapses and will need to increase his strength to defend in the post and secure a higher number of rebounds. If Markovic improves his offensive efficiency, self-creation ability, and aggressiveness while improving his defensive production and consistency, he can earn a consistent reserve role playing 20- 26 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Markovic has effective footwork. He threatens the defense from the perimeter using his triple threat. He has a long first step to get by his defender but will benefit from developing his ability to play off two feet. He tends to lack composure while penetrating the paint. This leads to poor shot attempts or turnovers. He also demonstrates the ability to create on the block. He creates space well and converts attempts with either hand although he has a strong preference toward his right hand currently.

Markovic is a skilled ball handler. He lacks quickness while handling the ball and executes a one dribble move to get by his primary defender. He struggles to protect the ball against pressure. He also needs to improve his ability to gather the ball from his dribble into a shot or pass attempt.

Markovic is a three-level scorer who spaces the floor effectively. He shoots off the dribble or off the catch, but he is more consistent from catch and shoot situations. He sets his feet quickly and has a high release that is not affected by contests. He finishes in the paint but lacks poise to convert during his dribble drives. He also avoids contact which lowers his effectiveness near the rim.

Off-ball, Markovic is a legitimate catch and shoot threat. He converts his threes at a decent rate and honestly shows potential to improve. He uses his ball handling and driving ability to counter aggressive closeouts. This makes him more effective off-ball. He moves well without the ball and runs hard in transition to create advantages. He needs to increase his production on the offensive glass to play to his strengths.

Defensive Notes

Markovic is a decent defender but should not be considered a high end one. His length is impactful and imposing. He keeps his hands active, and he can generate deflections or protecting the rim. His defensive footwork is sound although his effort and awareness are poor. His defensive potential is greater than he has displayed at this point.

On-ball, Markovic has the foot speed, lateral agility, and length to defend on the perimeter. He is a step slow at times but uses his length and striding ability well to recover. He needs to increase his strength to guard on the block. He is backed down too easily and he will be a frequent target at the next level.

Off-ball, Markovic is less effective. He does not consistently communicate. He has poor effort and awareness. He is out of position on rotations or late to close out onto his responsibility. His lack of strength decreases his effectiveness while boxing out. He needs to show greater activity to increase his production on the defensive glass. Especially since he is so effective in transition.

38

Hansen Yang

252.6

Summary

Yang presents as an offensive oriented big, bodied center who generates quality production but lacks lateral mobility. Yang has great size and composed footwork from the low post and the perimeter. He is powerful and uses his footwork well to score on the block. He finishes with either hand and keeps his eyes up to find teammates. Unfortunately, he struggles with decision making and ball security while delivering passes. He demonstrates potential to stretch the floor, but he is very inefficient currently. Defensively, Yang uses his physicality and length well to protect the rim. He generates blocks at a high rate but outside of that, he is very limited. He has slow footspeed, decreased balance, and delayed reactions. He also demonstrates inconsistent effort and fatigue after playing for long stretches.

Expectations

I expect Yang to earn a roster spot on the back end of the bench as a support player who will compete for more playing time. Based on matchups and injuries, he can play up to 8-12 minutes a night providing offensive production and rim protection in the paint. Yang creates for himself on the block. He will also be used to set screens and either roll or pop depending on the defensive coverage. He is a skilled big man who creates on the perimeter using the triple threat, but he needs to improve his shooting efficiency to maximize his effectiveness. His playing time will likely be reduced due to his defensive deficiency. He will protect the rim and hold his ground in the post. But he will be an easy target for opposing teams. He will be a regular target on defense where teams will force him to defend space on the perimeter. If he improves his perimeter shooting, decreases his turnovers, and improves his lateral agility to defend on the perimeter, he can earn a larger reserve role playing 12-22 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Yang has well developed footwork from all areas of the court. He is most effective on the block where he sets up his attack to finish using either hand. He has an assortment counter moves if his initial move is covered. He also sets up his attack from the perimeter. He uses his triple threat well to create an attacking angle. Then he uses his big body to shield off defenders as he gets to his spot on the floor.

For a big bodied seven-footer, Yang has decent handles. He is comfortable handling the ball on the perimeter. He sequences moves while using his big frame to protect the ball. He is overambitious at times and trusts his skills too much which leads to turnovers.

As a shooter, Yang is most effective closer to the rim. He has soft touch around the rim and maintains his effectiveness while finishing using either hand. He lacks athleticism to finish over players and relies on his skill and touch to convert his attempts. This may lower his effectiveness at the next level as he faces greater athletes. He threatens the defense from the perimeter, but his efficiency is quite poor. He has a long shooting release and needs to improve his consistency to command more respect.

Off-ball, Yang sets solid screens on- and off-ball. He pivots well to re-screen or position himself to receive the ball. He uses his body and strength well to obtain low post positioning. He is active on the offensive glass, but I would like to see more consistent effort.

Defensive Notes

Yang is a very limited defender. He offers a big body in the paint and a long frame to protect the rim. Outside of that, his defensive impact is low. He is slow footed and struggles to move laterally. His reactions are slow. His effort is inconsistent, and he appears to lose interest when he is fatigued.

On-ball, Yang holds his ground well on the block. He is difficult to back down and has great length to contest shot attempts in the paint. On the perimeter, he is at a disadvantage. He struggles to keep up with perimeter players and plays off coverage as a result. This gives up easy pull up threes to shooters.

Off-ball, Yang’s length provides rim protection and the ability to disrupt passing lanes. He struggles to cover ground and is often absent while rotating to perimeter players. His lack of mobility restricts him to drop coverage during ball-screen plays. Fortunately, he holds his ground well to deny post entry passes. He offers rim protection from a help position. His activity on the defensive glass needs to increase. He tends to watch the ball off the rim rather than finding a body to boxout. This exposes him to second chance opportunities.

39

Rocco Zikarsky

257

Summary

Zikarsky presents as a rim protecting and lob finishing center. He has great size and length coupled with a young age. His game offers limited versatility, and he is recovering from a knee injury that occurred during this past season. His production and minutes were limited in the NBL but during his stretches of play, he demonstrated how he can use his size to impact the game near the rim on both ends of the court. Offensively, his role is limited as a screen setter, roller, offensive rebounder, and rim finisher. He demonstrated some ability to execute the offense from the top of the key, but he is most effective in the paint. His creation ability is limited, and his rebounding presence needs to improve to maximize his impact. Defensively, Zikarsky offers a similar low post role. On the perimeter he is exposed. He is limited to drop coverage and rim protection on the defensive end.

Expectations

I expect Zikarsky to earn a roster spot competing for a reserve center role playing up to 8-12 minutes a night. His game is very limited, but his size and age give him an opportunity to compete. Offensively, I don’t expect him to earn a role as a table setter or creator. He will be best utilized setting screens and playing near the rim. On the defensive end, he will have similar limitations. He will be exposed and targeted to defend on the perimeter. This will decrease his effectiveness on the defensive end as he is best suited to play in the paint protecting the rim. I don’t have great confidence that Zikarsky will secure a consistent role as he did not excel in the areas he needs to during his limited playing time in the NBL. If he improves his rebounding activity and finishing ability near the rim, his role could grow to a reserve center playing between 12-22 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Zikarsky needs to develop his footwork. He appears uncoordinated and unsure while isolating on the block. He lacks smooth transitions between his moves and has a high preference to finish with his left hand. This limits his options while creating.

Zikarsky is also a limited ball handler. He should not be asked to handle the ball from the perimeter using a live dribble. He demonstrates the ability to handle the ball and make sound decisions during DHOs which expands his offensive versatility.

He is an inefficient shooter and does not threaten the defense from the perimeter. He is willing to attempt threes and although his shooting form is not terrible, his consistency and efficiency reduce his ability to positively impact the game. Zikarsky is an above the rim finisher, but unfortunately, when he is not able to finish with a dunk attempt, he struggles with touch near the rim. He also has a strong preference toward his left hand limiting his shot variability.

Off-ball, Zikarsky offers a big body to set on- and off-ball screens. He can slip or roll off the action and present high hands to finish lob attempts. If he is not involved in screens, he moves in the dunker’s spot and stays read for dump off passes. He is active on the offensive glass, but to be honest, his activity level needs to increase substantially to earn a role at the next level. His ability to rebound is a lifeline to sustain a career in the NBA.

Defensive Notes

Defensively, Zikarsky is very limited. His best attributes are his height and length. His size allows him to have a rim protecting presence. He challenges shots with verticality and flips his hips relatively well to position himself for blocks from a help position.

On-ball, Zikarsky plays with good strength in the post but is exposed on the perimeter. He lacks agility and footspeed to offer variable screen coverage. He is best suited to play in drop coverage but that puts pressure on the defender guarding the ball handler.

Off-ball, he parks himself near the rim. He sits down low to anchor the paint and serve as a rim deterrent. He rotates well on drives and uses his length to alter or block shots. Like his offensive rebounding statement, Zikarsky needs to improve his ability to secure rebounds. He has great size and length to dominate the boards but does not secure them at a rate that is expected from someone standing over seven feet tall.

40

RJ Luis

210

Summary

Luis presents as an offensive oriented wing with good size who spaces the floor and creates in isolation. Luis has very effective footwork to set-up and execute his attacks from the perimeter, mid, and low post. He has a scoring mentality which decreases his impact as a facilitator. As a defender, Luis lacks consistency and effort. He has great positional size and length to match up versus multiple positions. His lack of attention and effort decreases his effectiveness which will restrict his overall impact on the game.

Expectations

I expect Luis to earn a reserve role playing between 8-12 minutes a game to provide scoring for the second unit. Luis will offer three-level scoring ability while on the floor. He lacks efficiency from the perimeter but regularly generates quality looks for himself during isolations. He also moves well without the ball and will crash the glass for second chance opportunities. On defense, Luis demonstrates greater ability than production. He has good size and length, but he lacks consistent effort and intensity. If he doesn’t improve his defensive play, his minutes will be limited at the next level. If Luis improves his shooting efficiency and defensive effort, his role can increase to 12-20 minutes as a quality scoring option off the bench who possesses multi-positional guarding capability.

Offensive Notes

Luis’ offensive ability stems from his very effective footwork. He sets up his attacks well from the perimeter. Defenders are off-balance matching up against him from the triple threat. Either direction and all shots are available within his arsenal keeping defenders on edge. After attacking, Luis consistently plays off two feet. He lands with balance and uses his poise to create a quality shot attempt.

Luis’ ball handling is average. He sequences moves together but he is a methodical dribbler versus a quick one. He relies on his footwork and long strides to get by his defender. He uses his screens well but has trouble maintaining ball control versus pressure, hard hedges, and traps. Luis tends to lose the ball in traffic while gathering it in the lane. This results in high turnovers numbers and decreases his effectiveness as a passer.

As a shooter, Luis has three-level scoring ability. He elevates well on his shot and has a high release point making it difficult to contest. Unfortunately, his efficiency is below average from all levels which decreasing his overall effectiveness. Luis is a strong long striding athlete who knows how to finish in the lane. He is a capable finisher using either hand.

Off-ball, Luis moves well to relocate and cut to find gaps within the defense. He is more effective as a cutter than a shooter since his shooting efficiency from the perimeter is below average. He is active on the offensive glass and uses his length well to high point rebounds.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Luis is often disappointing if you analyze his game for prolonged stretches. During short stretches, he is disruptive. He guards multiple positions and is a nuisance as his long arms contest shots or deflect dribbles. Most of the time, he is defending in a vertical stance. He is late to react and poor at changing directions.

On-ball, his vertical stance exposes him to dribble drives. He recovers quickly but turns completely to regain position. He has trouble stopping and changing directions due to this technique. He is slow getting around screens. His length is effective at contesting shots. He is willing to get physical and hold his own in the paint.

Off-ball, Luis lacks consistent engagement. At times he is not guarding anyone. He is late or out of control while recovering. This exposes him to dribble drives after closing out. He maintains decent rebounding numbers but watching film, the rebounding ability relates more to his ability to read the ball off the rim than physically boxing out. Oftentimes, he doesn’t locate a body to boxout and watches the ball ricochet off the rim hoping to make the right read to obtain the rebound. If he secures the rebound, his transition ability is very positive. He uses his long strides, ball handling, and strength to get into the lane and finish near the rim.

41

Brice Williams

205.8

Summary

Williams presents as an offensive oriented floor spacing wing who lacks athleticism which negatively affects his defensive impact. Williams is a well-developed offensive player who has good size and great fundamentals to maximize his abilities. He is a methodical attacker who maintains his composure while utilizing his footwork to create space. He is a perimeter-oriented attacker that scores from the midrange and beyond the arc due to lack of athleticism. He is unselfish and sees the floor well. He demonstrates good effort on the defensive end but lacks footspeed and lateral agility to effectively guard on the perimeter. He also is prone to mistakes while defending off-ball as he is caught watching the ball often and losing track of his responsibility.

Expectations

I expect Williams to earn a role as a complimentary reserve playing 8-12 minutes a game. Williams will fit in nicely into varying lineups as he can play on and off the ball. He sees the floor well, willing to set screens, able to isolate from the mid post, can utilize ball-screens, and space the floor as a catch and shoot threat. He lacks athleticism, so Williams struggles to explode by his defenders and finish near the rim. Williams is a liability on the defensive end which will limit his playing time. He lacks lateral agility and has many lapses off-ball. This makes him a consistent target by opposing teams. His lack of effectiveness is not due to effort but more so engagement and athletic limitations. If Williams continues to shoot at a high level and improve his off- ball defensive attentiveness, he can earn a larger role off the bench playing 12-20 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Williams demonstrates great composure on the offensive end, and it stems from his fundamental footwork. He receives the ball landing on two feet allowing him to utilize either pivot foot. He reads defenders well and utilizes his pivots, ball fakes, and eyes to create an opening to attack. He is a methodical attacker who looks to create space for his pull up shot. He lacks the speed to blow by his defender but if he is cut off, he passes the ball to keep the offense flowing.

His ball handling is effective without being flashy. He is efficient at setting up his attacks. He hardly over dribbles while creating and finds ways to create and exploit space. He gathers the ball cleanly to get into his shooting motion. If he does not create space for his shot, he passes the ball quickly and accurately to his teammates to set up their attack.

Williams is a very effective shooter. He gets great elevation on his shot and has a high and quick release. His shooting motion is consistent and maintains that consistency whether off the catch or off the dribble. Williams does a great job obtaining his balance before he shoots which increases his efficiency. He struggles to finish near the rim due to lack of athleticism and plays from the midrange out as a result.

Off-ball, Williams is very effective. He creates offense for himself and others with his movement or screen setting ability. He is unselfish and immediately looks to set screens if he does not receive the ball after his action. He is a catch and shoot threat with great range. His perimeter-oriented game does not offer support on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Williams is very limited as a defender. He has good size and length. He plays with good energy and effort, but he lacks athleticism, balance, and lateral agility to defend on the perimeter. He is also prone to lapses which exposes him further on the defensive end.

On-ball, Williams struggles to defend on the perimeter. He exposes his front foot often which creates easy openings for his opposition. He struggles to move his feet or change directions which puts his teammates in help positions often. His lack of mobility also affects his ability to negotiate screens, making him an easy target while defending.

Williams suffers more on the defensive end while guarding off-ball. He is willing to communicate and rotate appropriately but as the game progresses, he is caught watching the ball too often. He is late on rotations, hit by back-screens, or too far to close out or contest. Williams is also caught watching the ball after shots and is exposed to offensive rebounding opportunities. He is willing to boxout, but his technique is poor, and he is out of position far too often to make a positive impact.

42

Chaz Lanier

205.8

Summary

Lanier presents as a floor spacing catch and shoot guard. Lanier lacks the athleticism and height to play as a wing player and is best suited to play as an off-ball guard. He is limited as a self-creator or facilitator but very dangerous as a catch and shoot threat. Lanier has a good motor and moves well without the ball. He sets his feet quickly and shoots with confidence from the perimeter. Defensively, Lanier plays with decent effort, but his motor is more active on the offensive end. He is a limited athlete who has difficulty moving laterally which decreases his effectiveness on-ball. Lanier presents as a shooting specialist at the next level.

Expectations

I expect Lanier to earn a roster spot on the back end of the bench as a support player who will compete for more playing time. He will offer instant offense off the bench as a floor spacer playing between 8-12 minutes a game. His primary role will revolve around taking threes at a high volume. Impressively, he maintained his above average efficiency at a high volume during this past season in college which bodes well for his role at the next level. Defensively, Lanier will have difficulty keeping up with guards due to his athletic limitations. He will also have difficulty defending larger wings due to his lack of height. He will be exposed on the defensive end which will limit his minutes on the court. If Lanier develops into a dangerous high volume three-point shooter, he can earn a role off the bench playing up to 12-20 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Lanier has good footwork but limited explosiveness. He uses his triple threat well to get an angle against his defender but uses this advantage to create space for a midrange jumper. He consistently plays off two feet after attacking. Unfortunately, he has difficulty finishing in the lane due to his lack of height and he attacks to shoot rather than pass.

His ball handling is effective to set up his shot attempts but limited regarding getting into the lane. Lanier is smooth getting off his shot attempts off the dribble and has an assortment of moves to create space from three and the midrange.

Lanier has a very effective shot. He shoots slightly in front of his body which lowers the trajectory at times, but his efficiency is impressive from three. He gets the ball off quickly off the catch and off the dribble. He squares himself well to obtain his balance and line up his shot attempt. He shoots better off the catch than off the dribble making him a floor spacing threat. He is a confident shooter that converts his attempts from the perimeter at a high volume. Unfortunately, his efficiency near the rim and in the midrange is below average lowering his offensive impact.

Off-ball, Lanier is a great spacing threat. He has a great motor and constantly moves without the ball. He sets up and uses his off-ball screens well. He anticipates passes and sets his feet quickly to get into his shot attempts or attack an aggressive closeout. He will backdoor opponents that over play his perimeter threat which allows him to keep defenders guessing. He is a perimeter-oriented player, so he lacks activity on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Defensively, Lanier is limited by his height and athleticism. He has good length to compensate for his height but doesn’t overcome his lack of lateral agility. Lanier’s defensive effort is inconsistent and does not demonstrate the same motor on the defensive end as he demonstrates on the offensive end. He is a step slow reacting and that compounds the defensive issue as he lacks burst and agility.

On-ball, Lanier has difficulty keeping up with guards on the perimeter. He is a step low and has difficulty stopping or changing directions. His balance is poor, and he is often exposed by skilled ball handlers. He has difficulty navigating screens which limits who he can match up with on the defensive side of the ball.

Off-ball, Lanier’s engagement and effort are inconsistent. It may be due to his expenditure of energy on the offensive end but for him to carve out a role at the next level, he needs to improve his defensive consistencies.

43

Yanic Konan Niederhasuser

242.6

Summary

Konan presents as a long rim protecting center who plays above the rim and offers pick and roll ability. Konan has great length and relies on his length to be effective. His footwork on the block is underdeveloped but he pivots well in space while setting screens or rolling after the action. He is a lob threat who is willing to get physical but needs to increase his strength. He competes on the offensive glass to generate second chance opportunities. He is a limited self-creator, facilitator, and perimeter shooter. Defensively, his length offers great range to disrupt offensive actions. He is an efficient mover rather than a quick one. He offers variable ball-screen coverage, great rim protection, and is willing to play with physicality near the rim. He needs to increase his strength to hold his low post position and secure a higher rate of defensive rebounds.

Expectations

I expect Konan to earn a roster spot on the back end of the bench as a support player who will compete for more playing time. Based on matchups and injuries, he can play up to 8-12 minutes a night providing energy, physicality, and above the rim ability on both ends of the ball. Offensively, he will play in a support role off the ball where he can set screens, roll, run in transition, and compete on the offensive glass. He plays above the rim which allows him to convert attempts in the paint at a high efficiency. His offensive ability outside the paint is very limited. He needs to improve his footwork, self- creation ability, perimeter shooting, and passing ability to make a larger impact. Defensively, Konan’s length will offer rim protection and disrupt passing lanes. He lacks footspeed and lateral agility, so he is slightly exposed on the perimeter, but he uses his length and striding ability well to cover ground and contest. He needs to improve his strength to match up against NBA level centers. If Konan expands his offensive game and improves his strength and agility, he can earn a larger role off the bench playing between 12-20 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Konan’s footwork is underdeveloped and restricts his ability to create on the block. He rushes into his moves, and he is prone to turnovers while attempting to create. He needs to develop his feel and execution to improve his ability to create and convert near the rim. He demonstrates sound footwork while setting screens. He pivots well to re- screen or roll to the rim based on the defensive coverage.

Konan is a limited ball handler. He does not threaten the defense from the perimeter and is exposed to turnovers if he is asked to sequence dribbles. He is a direct line driver. The more he is asked to dribble, the less effective he is.

As a shooter, Konan has good form but is very inefficient outside of the restricted area. He does not threaten the defense from the midrange or the three-point line. He may have room for improvement based on his form, but his free throw percentage suggests otherwise.

Konan is best utilized in an off-ball role. He will set solid on-ball and off-ball screens. He times his screens well and reads the defense to react appropriately. He uses the screens to get depth during his post ups. He also rolls well with his hands ready to receive a lob pass. He does not space the floor well, but he runs hard in transition. He is also active on the offensive glass. He will have more of an impact on the glass if he increases his strength to maintain his positioning.

Defensive Notes

Konan is an effective defender due to his length and timing. He has very long arms and uses his striding ability to cover ground efficiently. He is a paint presence who understands how to position himself to protect the rim. He maintains his composure near the rim and does not haphazardly chase blocks. His footspeed and lateral agility are deficient which lowers his overall effectiveness.

On-ball, Konan plays with great physicality while competing on the block. He needs to increase his strength as he has difficulty sustaining his position despite his efforts. On the perimeter, Konan is slightly exposed. His length is impactful, but his footspeed is deficient. He is forced to play off ball handlers to stay in front and use his length to contest. Skilled ball handlers can take advantage of him on switches.

Off-ball, Konan offers variable ball-screen coverage. He can hedge, trap, switch, and drop. This allows him to offer defensive versatility. His length is very effective while hedging and his striding ability allows him to recover nicely. Overall, his greatest contribution comes from his rim protection. He reads the actions well and positions himself appropriately to contest shots. He does a great job of helping without over helping to protect the rim. He needs to improve his strength to compete better while working to obtain defensive rebounds. At this point, he will be pushed off his spot too easily.

44

Wooga Poplar

195*

Summary

Poplar presents as an off-ball guard or wing who offers energy and floor spacing ability. Poplar is an impressive athlete with good length which allows him to glide down the floor and cover ground easily. On offense, Poplar works best off ball where he provides spacing, cutting, and offensive rebounding. Poplar has a score first mentality while trying to create which lowers his facilitation ability. On defense, Poplar lacks consistency but when engaged, he is disruptive by generating deflections and securing defensive rebounds to push in transition. Ability is present but consistency is the limiting factor that will impact his contributions and role at the NBA level.

Expectations

I expect Poplar to earn a role as a reserve playing on the backend of an NBA roster battling for increased minutes. I anticipate that his minutes will fluctuate between 8-12 minutes a game. He will be responsible for providing energy and off-ball activity on the offensive end. He is a decent shooter who is athletic and long to attack aggressive closeouts after ball reversals. He provides timely cuts and activity on the offensive glass to generate second chance opportunities. Defensively, he needs to limit his errors, improve his effort, and maintain his composure to sustain a role on the NBA roster. Poplar has an NBA build and accompanying athleticism to earn an NBA opportunity. If he improves upon his deficiencies, he can increase his reserve role to play up to 12-18 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Poplar has good footwork, especially out of the triple threat. He is well developed utilizing jab moves and large steps to get by his primary defender. His first step quickness helps him get into the lane where he sequences a step through move or plays off two feet to finish.

Poplar is an average ball handler. He creates advantages with his footwork versus his ball handling. He has an effective crossover or spin move but relies on big moves to change directions as opposed to using quick moves. He attacks to score and lacks the vision or awareness to locate his teammates while attacking. This is why Poplar is better suited in a role off-ball. He is better at finishing plays rather than initiating them.

Poplar has a quick shooting release. His release is a little low affecting his ability to shoot over pressure or contests. Poplar converted his free throws and three-pointers at a decent efficiency for the season but game to game consistency was unpredictable. Poplar can shoot off the move or off the dribble. Overall, he needs to improve his ability to finish in the paint to increase his effectiveness while attacking closeouts.

Off-ball, Poplar can space the floor as a catch and shoot threat. He uses his quick first step to get by rotating defenders or uses a shot fake to relocate for three. He is an active cutter and consistently crashes the glass to create second chance opportunities. He is a long athlete that glides down the floor and this increases his ability to contribute in the transition game.

Defensive Notes

Defensively, Poplar demonstrates his effectiveness in spurts. At times, he is very disruptive. He is light on his feet while sitting in a low and wide stance. He changes directions effortlessly and causes a ball handling mishap by his persistent pressure. Other times, he is vertical and late to react. He will reach in for steals which exposes him to fouls.

He has the size, length, and athleticism to match up against guards or forwards. As mentioned, his foot speed and agility are very effective. He matches that speed with toughness allowing him to defend physical opponents. He plays with an edge and loses his composure at times.

Off-ball, Poplar fluctuates between over aggressiveness while denying passes which leads to backdoors or general lowered engagement which results in late or poor closeouts. If Poplar can maintain a place within those two extremes, his effectiveness on the defensive end will improve drastically. On a positive note, Poplar is very active on the defensive glass. He locates bodies to boxout and plays with physicality in the paint.

45

Johni Broome

249.4

Summary

Broome presents as a limited but effective undersized physical front court player. Broome is undersized for a center but plays with great awareness and physicality. He commanded a high usage at Auburn and did so effectively. Offensively, his contributions will be limited due to the deficiencies in his game. He is most effective creating and converting shots from the low to mid post, but he will have difficulty matching up against larger and more athletic personnel at the NBA level. He is an inefficient shooter and will need to dramatically improve his efficiency to warrant attention at the next level. He is best utilized setting screens, being physical on the glass, and making smart decisions. His athletic limitations and decreased size also lower his effectiveness on the defensive end. He will offer a physical presence in the paint, and he is dependable during defensive rotations, but he will be exposed while defending on the perimeter.

Expectations

I expect Broome to earn a roster spot on the back end of the bench as a support player who will compete for more playing time. Based on matchups and injuries, he can play up to 8-12 minutes a night providing energy and physicality on both ends of the floor. On the offensive end, he will be asked to compliment the offense as a screen setter, roller, ball mover, and rebounder. His role can grow substantially if he improves his efficiency as a shooter to space the floor. On the defensive end, he will be a reliable player who will communicate, be in the right position, rotate, offer rim protection, and secure defensive rebounds. Unfortunately, he will likely be targeted often to defend on the perimeter due to his athletic limitations. Broome drastically improved his game and was very productive at the college level. I don’t expect him to reach that level of productivity at the NBA level, but his role can increase to earn up to 10-18 minutes a night if he improves upon the deficiencies of his game.

Offensive Notes

Broome has great footwork at all three-levels. He demonstrates sound execution of the triple threat from the perimeter and mid post as well as low post footwork on the block. He creates space well using his footwork to generate a quality attempt. His effectiveness and efficiency are drastically better the closer he is to the rim as his ball handling and athleticism are limiting factors.

As a ball handler, Broome is average. He demonstrates an array of moves, but his advantages are created through his footwork and physicality versus by his ball handling ability. He lacks quickness and explosiveness with the ball.

He demonstrates the ability to score from all three-levels, but his efficiency is substantially better the closer he is to the rim. Altogether, his shooting release is prolonged and inconsistent, lowering his efficiency from the midrange, free throw line, and from three. He can shoot off the catch, while spotting up, or off the dribble but his most effective shots are his hook shots near the rim. His shooting percentages from three decreased as his shooting volume increased during this past season which does not suggest a promising development. Lastly, near the rim, he has a high preference to finish with his left hand, and this makes it easier to neutralize him while he is attacking.

Off-ball, he presents as a screen setter capable of popping or rolling. He is much more effective as a roller as his efficiency is higher near the rim. He consistently battles on the block for low post positioning for entry passes or offensive rebounds. You can easily count on his physical presence in the paint.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Broome relies on his length, instincts, and awareness to make a positive impact. He generates a good number of blocks and steals from help or low post defending positions. He anticipates well and needs to as his foot speed and lateral agility are deficient. He maximizes his abilities by maintaining effective defensive footwork.

While guarding the ball, Broome is much more effective on the block than he is on the perimeter. On the block, Broome plays with leverage and physicality to hold his ground. He understands post players preferences and positions himself well to contest without fouling. On the perimeter, his slow foot speed and lateral agility expose him to dribble drives. While defending, he finds himself in trailing positions often and loses his balance after a couple of moves. He demonstrates great persistence while recovering to hustle and attempt to impact the play.

Off-ball, Broome demonstrates a good awareness of the offensive actions. He positions himself well to guard his responsibility while helping his teammates. He reacts well and has long arms to deflect passes. He maintains his engagement and is on time during rotations. He also battles hard to secure rebounds after missed attempts.

46

Tamar Bates

191.4

Summary

Bates presents as a floor spacing dependable guard or wing who will provide positive contributions on both sides of the ball. Bates is a very engaged and commutative player. He has sound footwork, ball handling, and shooting ability to work on-ball and off-ball although he is best suited as an off-ball floor spacer. He has good length, but he is a limited athlete. The lack of athleticism affects his ability to create and finish near the rim. Defensively, he communicates and plays within the defensive system. He plays with consistent effort and is on time during rotations. He is a pesky defender who uses his length to disrupt passing lanes and generates steals. He is willing to get physical on the block despite lacking strength. He needs to improve his discipline as his aggressive play style exposes him to backdoors.

Expectations

I expect Bates to teeter on the line between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. In a limited role playing up to 6-10 minutes a game, Bates will contribute as a floor spacer and high effort defender. Offensively, he is best suited to work off-ball where he spaces the floor and runs off-ball actions to get open for a three. In certain circumstances, he initiates the offense or creates for himself, but he does not warrant a high usage currently. He is a supplemental player versus a feature one. Defensively, he will play within the defensive scheme and offer the ability to match up against different personnel. He plays with high effort and communicates with his teammates. He needs to improve his defensive discipline to reduce the number of errors. If Bates improves his creation and facilitation ability while tightening up his defense, he could earn a larger role playing between 12-20 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Bates has very sound and effective footwork. He is composed and sets up his attacks from the perimeter well using the triple threat. He utilizes either pivot foot and demonstrates patience while creating an opening. He uses a long stride to get by his initial defender, but lacks burst to get all the way to the rim. He plays off two feet but needs to improve his balance while landing to enhance his effectiveness. If balanced, he is very effective creating space for his shot.

Bates is a methodical ball handler versus an explosive one. He is efficient and effective as he determines his dribble moves. He creates space well and uses his striding ability to get by his defender. Once again, he struggles to gain separation to the rim which decreases his overall effectiveness. He also creates to score rather than pass which is an area of improvement. He sets up and uses screens well, adding another element to his game.

He is a very effective shooter. He converts his attempts from all three-levels at an impressive efficiency. He shoots threes off the catch and off the dribble. He sets his feet quickly to get into his shooting motion after receiving the ball from an off-ball action. He struggles to finish near the rim due to decreased athleticism.
His efficiency should improve if his balance improves while landing on two feet during his attacks.

Off-ball, Bates spaces the floor well. He relocates and runs off-ball actions effectively. He sets his feet quickly and keeps his hands ready to receive a pass. He attacks aggressive closeouts. He is also willing to crash the glass to create second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

Bates is a complimentary defender. He plays within the system and offers versatility as to who he can match up against. He has good size and length but lacks high end strength and lateral quickness. He maintains his engagement and communicates with his teammates. He plays in a low and wide stance. He also demonstrates sound defensive footwork.

On-ball, Bates can match up against different opponents although he may be at a slight disadvantage in most circumstances. He is an intense defender but a deficient one due to his lack of speed and strength. He may be beaten off the dribble against guards or backed down on the block against wings. Either way, he will compete and make life difficult for his opponent to the best of his abilities.

Off-ball, Bates is engaged and active. He is on time during his rotations. He keeps his hands active and looks to generate deflections for fast break opportunities. At times, he lacks discipline and is susceptible to backdoors. This is an area he needs to improve to reduce defensive mistakes. He may lack strength, but he is willing to get physical and compete on the block while boxing out.

47

Kobe Sanders

203.2

Summary

Sanders presents as a long energetic wing who provides limited but positive contributions on both ends of the court. Sanders has good length and size. He is a limited creator, but he has sound footwork and plays with an unselfish playstyle. He is a limited athlete who lacks speed and depends on his length to stride through the lane. Due to his lack of athleticism, he relies on his ability to play off two feet. Defensively, Sanders is a complimentary player whose length impacts passing lanes, but overall, generates low defensive production. He understands the defensive scheme and plays within that system to bring an element of reliability.

Expectations

I expect Sanders to earn a roster spot on the back end of the bench playing 6-10 minutes a game to provide energy on both ends of the floor. Sanders is a complimentary player who is better off-ball than on-ball. Sanders lacks ball handling, creativity, and quickness to create for himself and his teammates. As a result, he is better off the ball where he can space the floor, swing the ball, attack closeouts, and cut, and crash the glass. Sanders is a reliable defender but not a high end productive one. He has good size and length to fit within varying lineups. He matches up against guards and wings. He will play within the defensive system at an average production. If Sanders improves his creation and rim finishing ability while increasing his defensive production, he can earn a consistent reserve role playing 12-20 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Sanders has good footwork. He sets up his attack well out of the triple threat and uses his long strides to get by his initial defender. He lacks burst to gain separation and has adapted the ability to play off two feet. He lands with balance and utilizes either pivot foot to create space for his shot or a pass. He maintains his court vision to locate teammates after defensive rotations.

Sanders is a limited ball handler. He has an effective crossover to get by an overaggressive defender, but he has difficulty combining multiple dribbles moves together. Sanders is a methodical attacker versus an explosive one. Due to this, he is a straight-line driver who is less effective finishing near the rim if he doesn’t have a clear path available.

As a shooter, Sanders has good form and threatens the defense from all three-levels. He needs to improve his efficiency and consistency as he misses too many open rhythm shots. He has a high release and gets into his shooting motion quickly in the midrange. His shooting motion is slightly prolonged while gathering the ball off the dribble from beyond the arc. He also needs to improve his ability to finish near the rim to enhance his effectiveness at the next level.

Sanders moves well without the ball. He works hard to get open but requires more effort than most since he lacks quickness to create separation from defenders. He is a catch and shoot threat but as mentioned, he needs to convert his open looks at a higher rate to obtain a consistent role at the next level. He is willing to be active on the glass, but his perimeter style reduces his impact on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Sanders has good size and length to profile as a multi-positional defender. He plays with good effort and engagement on the defensive end. He anticipates drives well to make up for his lack of lateral agility. His length is impactful as he influences passes with his presence on the floor.

On-ball, Sanders is effective but continues to have limitations. Against guards, he lacks the quickness to keep pace with them on the perimeter. His anticipation and length allow him to position himself to contest but overall, he is at a disadvantage. He lacks footspeed and lateral agility to change directions quickly. Against wings, he needs to improve his strength to hold his ground more effectively.

Off-ball, Sanders communicates and plays within the defensive scheme. He keeps his hands active and is on time during defensive rotations. He covers ground well as he strides across the court. Despite his timely rotations and activity, he doesn’t produce stats at a high rate. If he turns his disruptions into deflections, he can earn a regular role on an NBA roster. Sanders will benefit from increasing his strength to improve his effectiveness on the defensive glass while boxing out.

48

Grant Nelson

229.8

Summary

Nelson presents as a high energy long wing who plays with great effort and persistence. Nelson is a bit wild on the court. He maintains a high activity level on both ends of the floor. He regularly dives for loose balls and crashes the glass. Offensively, he is a theoretical floor spacer as his shooting efficiency from the perimeter is very sporadic. He is best used in a complimentary role as a screen setter, ball mover, and offensive rebounder who sprinkles in scoring under the right conditions. Nelson relies on his energy and length to impact the game on the defensive end. He lacks strength to hold his ground in the post and struggles with foot speed to guard on the perimeter, but his length allows him to influence shots and passes, nonetheless. His aggressiveness will secure rebounds and generate deflections, but it will also expose him to fouls and defensive lapses.

Expectations

I expect Nelson to teeter on the line between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. If he makes an NBA roster, he will provide two-way energy off the bench playing between 6-10 minutes a game. Offensively, he will be most effective if he leans into his strengths as an off-ball energy asset. He needs to improve his shooting efficiency and ball security to expand his role beyond that. Defensively, Nelson will lean into his length and activity to disrupt offensive actions. He is better off-ball than on-ball where he covers ground well and deflects passes and shots as a help defender. He will be exposed if he is tasked with defending a quick or strong primary scoring option. If Nelson improves his offensive efficiency and reduces his defensive lapses, he could grow into a quality reserve role playing between 10-18 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Nelson has decent footwork out of the triple threat. There is nothing special about his attack other than the length of his stride to gain an advantage. He has difficulty playing off two feet so his effectiveness during his drives is much higher if he has a clear path to the rim.

Nelson can sequence multiple dribbles moves together but lacks quickness while handling the ball. He relies on big moves and long strides to get by his defender, but too many dribbles expose him to turnovers. He also demonstrates poor recognition of spacing and will attack into traffic too often. Overall, he is wild during his attacks which lowers his efficiency while exposing him to turnovers and charges.

As a shooter, Nelson has a long shooting release. He can make threes, but overall, he lacks efficiency to warrant respect. His free throw and three-point shooting percentage dropped during this past season which does give me great confidence in his shooting development at the next level. Near the rim, he relies on his length to finish over or through defenders. He has decent concentration and craftiness to alter his release versus a shot blocker.

Off-ball, Nelson is much more effective as a cutter and screener than as a floor spacer. He moves well without the ball and finishes at a decent rate if he has a direct line to the basket. He is very active on the offensive glass. His overall effectiveness will substantially improve if he converts more of his catch and shoot opportunities.

Defensive Notes

Nelson leans into his greatest strength as a defender, his length and hustle. He plays in a high stance and lacks foot speed to change directions well, but his heart, effort, and length allow him to get back into the play. He remains engaged and very active on the defensive end.

On-ball, Nelson has his deficiencies. As mentioned, he lacks foot speed which affects his ability to stay in front of shifty ball handlers. He has trouble cutting off their drives and getting around screens, but he has an impressive ability to use his length to recover and contest. Against post players, Nelson lacks strength to hold his ground. He is often targeted and that will likely be the case at the next level.

Off-ball, Nelson can use his strengths as a long active defender. He maintains his court awareness and keeps his arms active to deflect passes. He hustles during closeouts and rotations. He offers variable screen coverage options. He will dive on the ground for loose balls and crash the glass to secure defensive rebounds. His aggressiveness will expose him to errors, but it will be worth it if he generates enough disruptions.

49

Amari Williams

227*

Summary

Williams presents as an offensive minded reserve center whose minutes will fluctuate as much as his effort does. Williams has good length, a strong frame, and decent court awareness to run the offense and generate deflections on defense. Offensively, he generates efficient offense near the rim, but his efficiency drops significantly the further he is from the basket. He sees the floor well and executes the two-man game. He is a willing passer but forces passes too often. On defense, Williams depends on his length and positioning to protect the rim and generate deflections. He is exposed while defending on the perimeter as he lacks footspeed to defend in space. His effort fluctuates which results in offensive rebounds or late rotations. The most frustrating aspect is that he demonstrates the ability to hustle and cover ground, but he lacks consistency.

Expectations

I expect Williams to fluctuate on the line between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. If Williams sits on the end of the bench, he will compete for a larger role playing between 6-10 minutes a game during non-competitive end of game scenarios. On offense, he will function as a screen setter, offensive rebounder, and run two-man actions with a quality perimeter player. On defense, he will be responsible for protecting the rim and securing defensive rebounds. He will be exposed defending on the perimeter so I expect his playing time to remain limited as he will be targeted often. If he does not maintain regular activity on the defensive glass, his days in the NBA will be numbered. If Williams improves his effort, rebounding production, and minimizes his turnovers while handling the ball, he can earn a reserve role playing between 10-18 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Williams offensive footwork is not as developed as you would expect from a 23-year-old post player. His low post footwork is centered around creating shots for his left hand. This restricts his arsenal and decreases his overall effectiveness. For a post player, he handles the ball at a decent rate on the perimeter. His footwork out of the triple threat is average but he struggles to maintain his balance while playing off two feet.

Williams is an average ball handler. He is asked to handle the ball on the perimeter but primarily as a passer scanning the floor for cutters or while executing DHOs. He is loose with the ball if he is asked to sequence too many dribbles together.

As a shooter, Williams is deficient from the perimeter. He reluctantly shoots from three but for good reason as his efficiency is well below average. He is more effective in the paint and has a strong preference for finishing with his left hand. He has good touch around the rim using his left but needs to grow his confidence in his right hand to increase his overall effectiveness.

Off-ball, Williams sets solid screens and makes himself available to execute DHOs with his teammates. He has good timing with his ball handlers and keeps his hands active while slipping or rolling. He has great length and strength to make his presence felt on the offensive glass to generate second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

Defensively, the further Williams is from the rim, the less effective he is as a defender. He plays in a high defensive stance which affects his ability to change directions or maintain his balance. His foot speed and effort are deficient which further exposes him on the perimeter.

On-ball, Williams has good strength and length to hold his ground in the post. He positions himself well and maintains verticality while contesting. Williams loses his effectiveness while guarding on the perimeter. He is exposed during switches as his high stance and slow foot speed slow his ability to guard and react. This reduces his screen coverage options as he is most effective playing back in drop.

Off-ball, Williams loses his engagement and effort. He anchors the paint but offers little else outside of that. His long arms allow him to deflect passes and protect the rim. Generally, he is slow to react and late during rotations. His deficiencies wouldn’t be as consequential if he maintained his effort on the defensive glass. Unfortunately, he is inconsistent locating bodies to boxout and gives up offensive rebounds at a rate that is detrimental to his team’s defensive success.

50

Koby Brea

201.8

Summary

Brea presents as a dangerous three-point shooting threat who offers little outside of this floor spacing ability. Brea has good size and maintains his activity level on the offensive and defensive end. Offensively, he is solely used as a floor stretcher. He moves well without the ball to create space for his shot. He is confident and gets into his shooting motion quickly. He converts his threes at a high efficiency and volume. He understands the respect and attention his shooting draws and uses it to his advantage to create space for quality perimeter opportunities. Defensively, he is engaged but his contributions are limited. He doesn’t offer much on the defensive end regarding generating stats or locking down an attacker, but he plays with consistent effort.

Expectations

I expect Brea to teeter on the line between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. His shooting is a game swinging skill, and I can see him competing for more playing time in a small role playing between 6-10 minutes a game. He will warrant defensive attention any time he is on the floor due to his very effective perimeter shooting. If his shooting is neutralized, he offers little else as a self-creator, facilitator, or rebounder on the offensive end. On the defensive end, he is reliable and plays with consistent effort but lacks overall production. His NBA role depends on his ability to convert his threes. If he makes his threes at a good volume and produces more on the defensive end, he can earn a larger role playing up to 10-16 minutes a game off the bench.

Offensive Notes

Brea’s footwork is effective, and he utilizes it well to get into his shot. He uses shot fakes and jab steps to get defenders to react before relocating for a three or a midrange jumper. He demonstrates the ability to play off two feet in the lane, but he prefers a perimeter-oriented attack which limits these opportunities.

As a ball handler, Brea’s game and effectiveness is centered around his shooting. He uses hesitation moves to get defenders to bite and contest before he executes a move to relocate for another three or midrange jumper. He gathers the ball cleanly off the dribble. This allows him to get into his shot or pass to his teammates. He sees the floor well and passes the ball appropriately, but his primary option is to shoot over facilitating.

His shooting is dangerous. His form is consistent and quick. He makes shots with balance or without balance. He maintains his effectiveness while spotting up, catching the ball on the move, or dribbling into his attempts. He maintains his efficiency while increasing his volume which bodes well for future production. Unfortunately, he is not as effective finishing near the rim. He lacks explosiveness to get to the rim and finish over defenders and that may be why he is reluctant to get in the paint.

Off-ball, Brea has a gravitational force around him. He warrants attention as he is always a threat to shoot. He does not remain stationary off-ball but relocates well and uses actions to get open. He will contribute on the offensive glass, but he primarily lives on the perimeter.

Defensive Notes

On the defensive end, Brea is another body. He maintains his activity and engagement, but his production is low. He plays within the team concept. He is reliable and that aids his role especially if his shots are going in on the offensive end. Just don’t expect him to lockdown an opponent or generate a lot of deflections. His defensive technique and footwork are sound. He has good length and size, so it is a bit perplexing why he doesn’t generate more stats.

Brea has the size and length to match up against guards and wings. He will have trouble with both as his foot speed will give him trouble against guards and his strength will give him trouble against wings. He is late to react which requires his teammates to be ready to help. And due to his late reactions, he has trouble getting around screens.

Off-ball, Brea plays within the team concept. He is on time during rotations and remains engaged. He doesn’t generate a lot of deflections, but he is reliable to communicate and be in the right position. He is inconsistent boxing out and susceptible to giving up offensive rebounds.

51

KJ Adams

225*

Summary

Adams presents as an athletic and strong undersized wing or front court defender who provides great energy but lacks offensive abilities. Adams is very explosive and plays above the rim effectively. He is not a shooting threat but fits well within an offensive lineup as a complimentary piece. He has good court awareness, sets screens, finds soft spots, cuts, moves the ball quickly, and crashes the glass. He excels as a roller where he finishes lob passes or makes sound decisions in the short roll. Defensively, Adams is a versatile piece who can guard all five positions. He stays engaged on- and off-ball. He communicates and is in position to help or rotate regularly. His hustle is endless, and his athleticism makes up for his decreased size and length.

Expectations

I expect Adams to earn a roster spot on the back end of the bench as a support player who will compete for more playing time. In limited spurts of 6-8 minutes a game, Adams will provide energy and defensive versatility. He is a glue piece on offense who will do the dirty work by setting screens and competing on the offensive glass. On defense, he plays within any lineup as his athleticism and strength allow him to guard on the perimeter or bang on the block. Adams is not flashy, but he is reliable. If he can develop his offensive game to space the floor more effectively, he could grow into a consistent reserve role playing up to 12-18 minutes a night.

Offensive Notes

Adams continued to develop his footwork throughout his collegiate career. Although he is not superb, he is effective. His triple threat is not as dangerous further from the rim as his perimeter shooting does not warrant respect. From the mid to low post, he plays off two feet and maintains his court awareness. He lacks length making it difficult to get his shot attempts up over longer defenders.

As a ball handler, Adams is very limited. He should not be asked to create offense off the dribble. The more he dribbles the less effective he is. His dribbling should be limited to one to two dribbles into a shot attempt or pass.

Shooting is also an area of weakness for Adams. He does not offer floor spacing ability. He stretched his range to the midrange but that shot is an inefficient shot within his arsenal. He developed an effective push shot after receiving the pass on the short roll. Otherwise, his attempts should be near the rim. Ideally, with momentum towards the basket so he can finish over and above his opponents. He is a dangerous lob threat and has decent touch around the basket. His length affects his ability to get his shot attempts up cleanly during post up situations, so his shot diet is relatively restrictive.

Off-ball, Adams is a great glue piece. He understands his role and sets on- and off-ball screens throughout offensive actions. He has a good feel for the game and understands when to roll, slip, or cut to get into the middle of the defense. He is a superb lob threat and has great energy on the offensive glass. He is persistent, powerful, and difficult to boxout. He creates and converts second chance opportunities at a decent rate.

Defensive Notes

Defensively, Adams provides great versatility. He played a front court position in college, but he has the size and athleticism of the wing at the NBA level. His height and length are not impressive, but his explosiveness, lateral agility, and strength are. He maintains good defensive technique and footwork while guarding on the perimeter. And he maintains great leverage and strength while guarding on the block. He maintains active hands, communicates, and remains engaged on a possession-by-possession basis.

On-ball, Adams defends all positions. His footspeed and lateral agility allow him to play against guards on the perimeter. This allows him to offer different screen coverage options as he can switch, trap, hedge, or drop depending on the defensive scheme. In the post, he will play with physicality to hold his ground. His area of weakness in the post is that he lacks length. He may hold his ground versus isolation post ups, but his lack of length doesn’t pose as a distraction while contesting.

Off-ball, Adams moves very well. He is in position on rotations. He communicates with his teammates. He understands the defensive gameplan. He regularly helps or recovers on time. He closes ground with great discipline as he will contest and be in position to cut off the drive. He offers weakside rim protection by using his above the rim ability to deter shots in the paint. His hustle is contagious, and he consistently runs the floor in transition. He dives for loose balls and consistently finds bodies to boxout.

52

Izan Almansa

220.4

Summary

Almansa presents as an undersized finesse front court player. Almansa is clearly skilled as evident by his footwork and the variety of his shot attempts within his arsenal, but his efficiency is poor. He has a good basketball awareness but has difficulty capitalizing on the advantages that he creates. On the offensive end, he is best used off-ball where he can set screens, roll or slip the action, cut, and move the ball quickly if his shot is unavailable. His shooting efficiency from all levels is below average. On the defensive end, Almansa offers good length, awareness, and defensive footwork but his engagement is inconsistent, and his footspeed is slow. His defensive contributions are low in all areas, and he needs to maximize his abilities to find a consistent role at the next level.

Expectations

I expect Almansa to fluctuate on the roster bubble floating between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. At this point, I envision Almansa’s minutes coming at the end of games during mop up duty playing between 6-8 minutes a night. Offensively, he serves as a complimentary piece off the bench who offers screen and roll ability. He needs to improve his shooting efficiency from all levels to warrant regular shot attempts. He has potential to space the floor and initiate the offense from the top of the key, but these are hopes more than guarantees. On the defensive end, Almansa will have difficulty if he doesn’t improve his engagement and attention. His length and awareness can interrupt passing lanes, but his footspeed will give him trouble on the perimeter. He also needs to increase his strength to hold his ground on the block. If Almansa improves his offensive efficiency and defensive engagement, his role could grow to a regular reserve playing 10-18 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Almansa has good footwork from the low post, mid post, and perimeter. He executes out of the triple threat or during post up situations. He creates angles to attack but has difficulty capitalizing on those advantages. He is a direct line drive who needs to develop his ability to play off two feet.

As a ball handler, Almansa is limited. He struggles to maintain control of the ball on the perimeter and is exposed to turnovers if his direct drive is cut off. He handles the ball well from a DHO perspective where he protects the ball and finds his teammates after reading the defense.

Almansa struggles to convert his attempts from all levels. He is clearly skilled near the rim, but he lacks explosiveness to finish over physical and long rim protectors. He also has a long shooting release that is inconsistent. This hitch in his shooting motion lowers his efficiency from the midrange, free throw line, and three-point line.

Off-ball, Almansa sets solid screens. He reads the defense well knowing when to slip, pop, and roll. He keeps his hands ready to receive passes and converts his attempts if unabated toward the basket. Due to his poor shooting efficiency, he doesn’t offer much in the sense of floor spacing. He finds soft areas to cut against the defense. And he would benefit from more activity on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Almansa is limited as a defender. He has good length and defensive footwork, but his effort and engagement are inconsistent. This is unfortunate since he has a good basketball sense and awareness, but he doesn’t tap into it consistently. This slows down his reaction times and lowers his effectiveness on the defensive end.

Almansa has difficulty defending on the perimeter due to a lack of footspeed and lateral agility. He is exposed after switching which lowers his defensive versatility. He also needs to increase his strength to compete and hold his ground versus post up attempts. He has good length to generate steals or obtain blocks, but his defensive production remains low.

Off-ball, Almansa is out of position often. This results in late rotations and misses opportunities to generate deflections or protect the rim. His lack of strength also affects his ability to boxout and secure defensive rebounds. If Almansa hopes to find an NBA role, his defensive effort and engagement will need to vastly improve.

53

Kam Jones

202.2

Summary

Jones presents as an energetic on- and off-ball guard who can create, finish, and facilitate on the offensive end while maintaining intensity on the defensive end. Jones is a quick twitch athlete who plays with a high intensity on the court. He is a team player who fits into whatever role is required. He is a skilled ball handler with an explosive first step to break down his defenders and put pressure on the second line of defense. His shooting form and efficiency is inconsistent which lowers his offensive impact. But he maintains his confidence and is effective without generating a high usage. On the defensive end, Jones maintains the same level of energy and intensity. He is reliable. He communicates and understands the team concept. He plays with sound defensive technique and footwork. He has quick hands, and he is a bit of a gambler who attempts to generate steals. He lacks size and strength to match up against wings, but he will battle them with physicality to make their lives difficult.

Expectations

I expect Jones to fluctuate on the line between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. He may find his way on an NBA roster for a prolonged period due to his high energy, supportive nature, and charisma. He will compete for a larger role to provide two-way energy off the bench playing between 6-8 minutes a game. Offensively, he fits in nicely with any guard as he can play on- or off-ball. He may be limited on the defensive end as to who he can guard, but you can rely on his energy during his minutes. His minutes will likely remain limited due to his inefficient offensive nature and his overall lack of size and strength on the defensive end. If Jones improves his shooting efficiency and his defensive discipline, he could earn a larger role off the bench playing up to 10-16 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Jones has very effective footwork. He is composed and effective from the perimeter using the triple threat or while playing off two feet after attacking. He has an explosive first step to expose any opportunity he creates from his footwork. He plays low to the ground to dip by defenders, and he maintains his balance while playing off two feet.

As a ball handler, Jones is electric. He is very shifty with the ball. He changes directions and speeds well. He sets up his screens to find ways to get into the middle of the defense. He attacks with his eyes up which allows him to locate teammates after drawing help defenders. His ball security needs improvement as he penetrates too deep which exposes him to turnovers.

His shooting is an adventure. He has an inconsistent release that puts sideways rotations on his shot attempts. As a result, he is very streaky from the perimeter. Fortunately, he maintains his confidence and is effective shooting off the catch or off the dribble. He seldomly settles for midrange jumpers and instead, penetrates to get to the rim. His rim finishing ability is below average despite being a creative finisher. He struggles against the size and length of rim protectors.

Off-ball, Jones offers floor spacing capabilities as a catch and shoot threat. He will attack aggressive closeouts and find teammates after collapsing the defense. Jones moves well without the ball and maintains great activity on the glass for a guard.

Defensive Notes

Jones is a very aggressive and effective defender, but he is limited as to who he can match up against. He lacks size and strength, so he is better at defending against guards. He plays with a low and wide defensive stance. He has sound defensive footwork. He changes directions well and anticipates action on the floor.

As mentioned, Jones is best at defending against guards. He will cut off their drives and disrupt their ball handling. He defends with his feet and puts himself in position to contest or generate a steal. He is quick and gets over screens well. If he is matched up against a larger opponent, he will battle them with physicality, but he is often over matched.

Off-ball, Jones maintains good defensive activity and engagement. He plays within the team concept and communicates regularly on the floor. He is on time during his rotations. He keeps his hands active and is an aggressive defender who gambles for steals. This will put him out of position, but his effort is never lacking. He is physical while denying post entry passes and while boxing out to secure defensive rebounds.

54

Micah Peavy

211.6

Summary

Peavy presents as a long and athletic floor spacing defensive wing. Peavy has a long frame and uses his length effectively to slash to the basket, run in transition, and generate steals. Specifically on the offensive end, he struggles with his ball security and self-creation. He is better suited to play in an off-ball role where he spaces the floor, cuts, and is active on the glass. He was a very efficient three-point shooter this past season. He maintained his efficiency at a high volume. He steadily improved his shooting percentage from three each season, but all previous seasons were well below average. He is a below average free throw shooter for his entire career, so this past season has me concerned that it was an aberration versus a new norm. As a defender, Peavy offers great length to guard multiple positions. He is light on his feet and keeps his arms active. He is much more effective defending on-ball versus off-ball due to defensive lapses.

Expectations

I expect Peavy to fluctuate on the line between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. He will continually compete for a larger role while playing limited minutes at the end of a non-competitive contest averaging about 6-8 minutes a game. Peavy will play in a complimentary role on the offensive end. He will space the floor, cut to the basket, and be active on the glass. He needs to develop his ball handling and creation ability as he is turnover prone and deficient currently. On the defensive end, Peavy can guard multiple positions due to his length and agility. He is best utilized defending a ball dominant opponent as his effort and consistency on-ball is much better than off-ball currently. If Peavy maintains his three-point shooting efficiency, improves his ball security, and off-ball defensive awareness, he could earn a larger role playing 10-14 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Peavy’s footwork is basic and reduces his ability to create from the perimeter. It also lowers his ability to generate a quality attack after penetrating the defense. He lacks patience and creativity. His decreased utilization of playing off two feet after attacking contributes to his high turnover rate.

As a ball handler, Peavy requires ongoing development. He struggles to handle the ball against pressure. He attacks into traffic which exposes him to turnovers. He is a long strider who excels in transition or during unabated direct line drives to the rim.

Peavy is a solid shooter although he is very inconsistent. He had his most successful three-point shooting season his senior year. He increased his shooting volume while improving his shooting percentage. Oddly enough, his free throw shooting remained below average. This is a concerning trend that has me suspecting that this last season was an aberration. He is more consistent shooting off the catch than off the dribble.

Off-ball movement is a great trait of Peavy. He spaces the floor by relocating or running actions to get open for a perimeter shot or cut. He is a slasher whose effectiveness finishing in the paint is greatly improved when he has momentum. He remains active without the ball and demonstrates good activity on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Peavy is a solid defender who has the potential to increase his effectiveness. He plays in a low and wide stance. He is light on his feet and changes directions well. He anticipates attacking angles and beats his responsibility to their spot. He has great size, length, and quickness to defend against guards and wings.

On-ball, Peavy is disruptive. He impacts the game with his high energy, active hands, anticipation, and quick feet. He beats ball handlers to their spots and generates steals at an impressive length. He is a quick defender versus a strong one and will benefit from increased strength to hold his own against post isolations.

Off-ball, Peavy is prone to errors. He has lapses in his attention and fails to communicate with his teammates. His off-ball impact is unreliable on a possession-by- possession basis, but he may generate a deflection or jump a passing lane to kick start transition opportunities. His activity on the defensive glass is lacking. He rarely boxes out as he watches the ball off the rim in hopes of tracking the ball to secure the rebound.

55

Lachlan Olbrich

230.2

Summary

Lachlan is a limited front court player. He has decent size, good footwork, and plays with a consistent motor on both ends of the floor. Overall, his production and efficiency is below average making it difficult for him to find a consistent role at the NBA level. Offensively, he has well developed footwork, runs the floor hard, and shows good court awareness, but it is difficult to envision an area he can contribute consistently at the next level. Defensively, Lachlan lacks athleticism which affects his ability to protect the rim and guard on the perimeter. Once again, he will have difficulty carving out a role to contribute positively at the NBA level.

Expectations

I expect Lachlan to fluctuate on the line between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. He will continually compete for a larger role while playing limited minutes at the end of a non-competitive contest averaging about 6-8 minutes a game. Lachlan will need to improve his perimeter shooting ability as well as produce more near the rim regarding points and offensive rebounds. On the defensive end, Lachlan needs to demonstrate better ability to defend on the perimeter and be more productive obtaining defensive rebounds or protecting the rim. If Lachlan demonstrates those improvements, he could earn a reserve role on an NBA roster playing between 10-12 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Lachlan has well developed footwork from the perimeter and low to mid post. He is balanced while executing his triple threat. His effectiveness setting up his attack from the triple threat will grow substantially if he can improve his efficiency from three. On the block, he executes his pivots well but needs to convert his attempts at a greater rate.

As a ball handler, Lachlan is limited as are most post players. He has enough ball handling abilities to handle the ball on the perimeter but shouldn’t be tasked with this responsibility at a high volume.

Lachlan has a good shooting stroke and shows floor spacing potential. Unfortunately, his efficiency from the perimeter is well below average and doesn’t warrant respect currently. He has decent touch around the rim but lacks athleticism to finish above the rim, so he relies on finesse during his attempts.

Off-ball, Lachlan sets solid screens and makes sound decisions on when to pop, slip, and roll based on the defensive coverage. His effectiveness as a popper will greatly improve if his shooting efficiency increases. He needs to show more aggressiveness and urgency on the offensive glass to find ways to contribute on the offensive end. He runs the floor effectively which allows him to generate quality attempts versus mismatches.

Defensive Notes

Lachlan is very limited as a defender. He is considered small for an NBA center. He also lacks strength, athleticism, and lateral agility to defend effectively on the perimeter or near the rim. He does not generate defensive stats at a high rate, and he is difficult to project as a consistent contributor at the NBA level.

On-ball, Lachlan will be exposed on the perimeter or in the paint. His lack of athleticism and lateral agility will impact his ability to switch onto guards or wings. This will limit him to drop coverage against ball-screens. In the paint, he is over-matched by physical centers and needs to improve his strength and physicality to increase his effectiveness.

Off-ball Lachlan has trouble moving on the perimeter and doesn’t offer great rim protection from the block. He also doesn’t generate defensive rebounds at a high rate. These negative statistics are detrimental to Lachlan’s case to earn a roster spot at the NBA level.

56

Igor Milicic Jr.

224*

Summary

Milicic Jr. presents as a high energy wing or front court player who will complement the team on both ends of the floor. Milicic Jr. has good size and length. Offensively, he has composed footwork and threatens the defense from the perimeter albeit at a below average efficiency. He works better off-ball where he can set screens, cut, space the floor, and maintain high activity on the offensive glass. Defensively, Milicic Jr. maintains a similar level of high energy but struggles to change directions and cover ground. He is reliable regarding his effort and positioning, but he will be exposed by quicker or more physical opponents.

Expectations

I expect Milicic Jr. to fluctuate on the line between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. He will continually compete for a larger role and likely play his minutes at the end of a non-competitive contest playing 6 minutes a game. Milicic Jr. will serve as a complimentary piece on the offensive end. He is best utilized off-ball where he can set screens, space the floor, move the ball in the flow of the offense, cut, and crash the glass. He is limited as a creator due to deficient ball handling and athleticism. He also needs to improve his shooting efficiency to increase his impact on the floor. On the defensive end, Milicic Jr. will provide constant energy. He will rotate and communicate. He may be exposed on the perimeter and in the post, but he will compete to make life difficult for his opponents. Milicic Jr. has a higher ceiling grade than others graded in this area due to his floor spacing ability, basketball awareness, effort, and size. If he improves upon his deficiencies, he could grow into a consistent reserve role playing up to 10-18 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Milicic Jr. has very effective footwork from the perimeter and the mid to high post. He is comfortable executing out of the triple threat and has a long first step to get by his defender. Due to decreased athleticism, he struggles to get all the way to the rim and is often forced to play off two feet. He is comfortable in this position as he utilizes either pivot foot and maintains his court vision to locate his teammates.

Milicic Jr. is a below average ball handler. He can handle the ball on the perimeter but relies on his footwork to create an advantage. After that, he is a straight-line driver that lacks shiftiness and burst.

He threatens the defense from the perimeter but struggles to maintain a consistent release. His release varies which contributes to his inefficiencies. He is better at spotting up from three than shooting off the dribble, but he needs to convert his attempts at a higher rate to be considered a threat. Due to his lack of athleticism, he struggles to finish near the rim. He is a below rim finisher who relies on finesse around the rim instead of elevation to convert his attempts.

Off-ball, Milicic Jr. brings constant activity as a screener on or off the ball. He reads actions well to find gaps within the defense. He constantly crashes the glass to create second chance opportunities. He plays with persistent effort and hustle.

Defensive Notes

Milicic Jr. has his strengths and weaknesses on the defensive end. He has good size and length to match up against post players and wings. Unfortunately, he struggles against the quickness of wings and has difficulty against the power of post players. During each situation, you can rely on his effort and persistence to make life difficult for his opponents. He maintains his awareness and engagement on the defensive end. He consistently communicates while he is on the floor.

On-ball, Milicic Jr. struggles to change directions. He plays in a low defensive stance and utilizes good footwork but lacks the agility and footspeed to keep up versus perimeter players. In the post, he battles physically to hold his position. Despite his efforts, he is backed down too easily and will benefit from increasing his strength.

Off-ball, Milicic Jr. puts himself in the right positions on the court. He anticipates the offensive actions and communicates with his teammates. He keeps his hands active to generate deflections. He may be a step slow during rotations but that is due to athleticism and mobility, versus engagement and attention. He maintains high effort on the defensive glass. He is always locating a body to boxout to secure defensive rebounds. After securing a rebound, he is quick to deliver an outlet pass or dribble the ball up the floor himself.

57

Zacharie Perrin

220*

Summary

Perrin presents as an offensive oriented facilitating center who lacks defensive production and upside. Perrin has decent size and length. He has sound footwork and creative finishing ability near the rim. He handles the ball well for a center and sees the floor well to locate his teammates. Overall, he is prone to mistakes, limited finishing above the rim, and is an inefficient perimeter shooter. Each of these attributes lower his overall production. On the defensive end, Perrin’s deficiencies are more glaring. He stands in an nonathletic stance. He lacks foot speed, lateral agility, and balance. This lowers his effectiveness guarding on the perimeter and restricts the team’s options to cover ball-screens. He also lacks effort and strength which lowers his overall impact on the defensive end.

Expectations

I expect Perrin to fluctuate on the line between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. He will continually compete for a larger role and likely play his minutes at the end of a non-competitive contest participating in 6 minutes a game. At this point, his primary role revolves around his offensive ability as a ball handler and passer. He requires ongoing development to warrant this role as he is inefficient from the field and struggles with ball security. He is an effective screener and moves well without the ball to find space to create and facilitate. Defensively, Perrin presents as a liability. He lacks strength to effectively defend in the post and the lateral agility or athleticism to defend on the perimeter. In addition to his physical limitations, he struggles to maintain high effort and engagement. If Perrin improves his offensive efficiency, reduces his turnovers, and improves his defensive effort, he can earn a larger reserve role playing 10-18 minutes a game. The prerequisite skill appears within him, but my confidence in him to reach that potential is low.

Offensive Notes

Perrin demonstrates sound footwork. He can set up his attack from the perimeter using the triple threat, but his deficient shooting ability diminishes his effectiveness. He is best using his footwork to create on the low block. He utilizes either pivot foot and is a capable finisher using either hand. This allows him to keep defenders guessing while setting up his attack.

As a ball handler, Perrin is skilled. He effectively manipulates the ball using either hand. He sequences moves and attacks space well. He struggles to maintain his ball controlagainst pressure, but overall, his ability to attack the defense from the perimeter is a positive. He attacks with his eyes up. This allows him to find his teammates after reading defensive rotations.

As a shooter, Perrin needs a lot of improvement. He is inefficient from all levels but demonstrates a willingness to attempt threes. His shooting form is inconsistent which lowers his efficiency. If he can develop his perimeter shot, it will go a long way to improve his effectiveness on the offensive end. At this point, he is reliant on scoring from the paint where he has good touch finishing with either hand. He lacks athleticism so he relies on finesse to convert near the rim.

Perrin moves well without the ball. He is active and finds soft spots within the defense. He sets solid screens and offers the ability to roll, slip, or pop on the action. He will greatly improve his pop or slip effectiveness if he develops his perimeter shooting. He also needs to improve his activity on the glass to produce second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

Perrin really struggles on the defensive end and offers little production or value. He is exposed on the perimeter and in the post. He stands in an unathletic stance. He struggles to maintain his balance and lacks engagement on the defensive end of the floor.

On-ball, Perrin is very limited. He struggles to move laterally so he is easily targeted on the perimeter. He is restricted to drop coverage since his lateral mobility is deficient. On the block, Perrin needs to improve his strength to hold his ground versus post ups.

Off-ball, Perrin appears to lose interest. His engagement is poor and so is his production. He is out of position and late during rotations. He lacks activity and does not generate deflections or protect the rim. Lastly, he needs to show more activity on the defensive glass to secure rebounds. Overall, his boxout effort is poor.

58

Eric Dixon

258.6

Summary

Dixon presents as an offensive oriented undersized front court player who scores from all three-levels but struggles to contribute on the defensive end. Dixon’s offensive game is very developed. He showcases great footwork, impressive ball handling, and shot- creation ability for a front court player. He converted his threes at a high rate and volume during his senior season. He commanded a high usage in college but is less effective without the ball in his hands. He is smaller in size and lacks athleticism which makes his fit at the NBA level problematic. Can he generate quality attempts against larger, more athletic opponents? That is a serious concern. He needs to be effective on the offensive end as his defensive production is relatively low. He struggles to move in space and is slow while changing directions to defend on the perimeter. He plays with physicality, but he lacks the length to impact opposing post players in the paint. He’s a tough fit into a lineup at the next level.

Expectations

I expect Dixon to primarily play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. On an NBA roster, he may average 6 minutes a game during non-competitive scenarios. He is an offensive oriented front court player who demands high usage. He is a great isolation scorer who threatens the defense from all three- levels but lacks facilitation instincts. His effectiveness off-ball is less impactful and makes it difficult to envision a consistent role for him at the next level. On the defensive end, he will be a liability. Due to his deficiency on the perimeter and in the post, he will be a regular target of opposing offenses. This will limit his overall minutes in a game. If Dixon continues to convert his threes at a high level, improve his ability to facilitate and impact the game without the ball, his role could grow to playing 10-16 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Dixon’s footwork is clinical. He understands how to use his jab steps, ball fakes, and pivot moves to create an opening to attack out of the triple threat. He lacks the explosiveness to get all the way to the rim, but he plays effectively off two feet at a high level. He maintains his composure and creates space for his shot attempts. He sets up his attacks to score rather than pass. This leads to poor shot selections and turnovers. He needs to improve this aspect of his game to grow his role at the NBA level.

Dixon is also a skilled ball handler. He sequences multiple dribble moves together while setting up his attack or shot attempt. He handles the ball on the perimeter like a guard but at a slower speed. Dixon is a skilled creator who generates shot attempts from all areas on the court.

His shooting is impressive. He maintains his confidence and shoots effectively off the dribble and off the catch. He increased his three-point shooting volume and efficiency during his senior season. That three-point shooting ability can be Dixon's lifeline for his career at the next level. He has a perimeter-oriented game. This may be due to his lack of athleticism and length. As a result, he struggles to finish in the lane versus more athletic competition.

Dixon is a ball dominant force, but his off-ball activity is less impactful. He initiates the offense so often that when he is not involved, he is standing in one position until the ball is passed to him. He is willing to set screens and offers pop or rolling ability. He needs to improve his activity on the offensive glass to create more second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Dixon offers little production. He lacks size, length, and athleticism. He struggles to cover ground and loses his balance while maneuvering. His effort and consistency are lacking which doesn’t bode well for his defensive potential.

On-ball, Dixon is exposed while on the court. On the perimeter, he is exposed to dribble drives easily. As a result, he plays off his responsibility and gives up easy pull up attempts. He struggles to move laterally and is in a lose-lose proposition while defending on the perimeter. Things don’t get much easier for him in the post. His lack of size and length diminish his ability to impact post players. He is willing to play with physicality but is shot over too easily.

Off-ball, Dixon struggles as well. His effort and attention are lacking. He covers ground slowly and finds himself out of position during rotations or he is late while closing out. As a result, his close outs are out of control, and he gives up driving opportunities. He doesn’t generate deflections at a high rate and needs to demonstrate more effort and consistency on the defensive glass.

59

Sion James

217.6

Summary

James presents as a physical defensive guard who offers great support on the offensive and defensive end. James is a physical and strong guard. He has good size and plays with great energy. He is a quality support player on both ends of the floor. Offensively, he is a complimentary player who spaces the floor, cuts, runs in transition, and crashes the glass. His ability to create and facilitate are limited, forcing him to play in an off-ball role. Defensively, he is a reliable player. He has enough quickness to defend against guards while matching the strength to play physically against wings. He plays within the team concept and offers timely help while communicating and being in position during rotations.

Expectations

I expect James to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. On an NBA roster, he may average 6 minutes a game during non-competitive scenarios. He is purely a complimentary player on both ends of the ball. He will play in an off-ball role on the offensive end to supplement as a three-point shooter, cutter, and offensive rebound. On the defensive end, he will fit into varying lineups to match up against different opponents and be in the right place at the right time. He is not a defensive specialist as he has his own deficiencies regarding lateral speed and quickness. Overall, his effort, engagement, and physicality will support his teammates. If James improves his offensive and defensive production, he can earn a limited reserve role playing 10-12 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

James has effective footwork. He does not utilize it often and he is not tasked to create or initiate the offense. He is a direct line drive who likes to attack the rim aggressively. He lacks vertical explosiveness which lowers his efficiency in the paint, but he plays off two feet to improve his effectiveness.

James is a limited ball handler. Ball handling opportunities are rare occurrences. He is an efficient dribbler who looks to utilize a simple move to get downhill. Overall, his creation ability is limited, and he needs further development to increase his impact at the next level.

James is an efficient shooter. He shoots well from all three-levels, but he is reliant on others to generate his shots for him. To his credit, he converts his attempts at a high rate even if they are a result of his teammates' creation. He is a three-level scorer but as I mentioned earlier, he struggles to finish near the rim due to lack of explosiveness and finesse.

James’ offensive contributions will revolve around off-ball activity. He will score in the flow of the offense rather than from plays designed for him. He moves without the ball to maintain spacing on the floor. He keeps his hands ready to shoot after his teammates draw help defenders. He is a physical cutter and transition threat. He also offers second chance opportunities with his effort on the glass.

Defensive Notes

Defensively, James is sound and reliable. He is not a shutdown defender or one who generates a high number of defensive stats. Instead, he is a disciplined one. He plays with sound technique and keen awareness. He values his positioning to contest shots. He has good anticipation, and this aspect is needed as he is deficient in footspeed and lateral agility.

On-ball. James offers multi-positional defensive versatility. He has enough athleticism to defend on the perimeter and great strength to battle in the post. His footspeed is slightly slow, but he makes up for it using his anticipation and reactions. He gets around screens and cuts off driving angles. On the block, he plays with great strength and leverage. He holds his ground well and puts himself in position to contest.

Off-ball, James understands the defensive gameplan and plays within the team concept. He positions himself appropriately. He communicates with his teammates and is on time during his rotations. He offers the ability to help and recover. He is very active on the defensive end but not to a degree that generates stats, but to make life difficult for opposing offenses. He maintains his high effort and physicality while boxing out for defensive rebounds.

60

Alijah Martin

208.4

Summary

Martin presents as a high energy physical defensive guard who compliments the offense in an off-ball role. Martin is a small physical and powerful guard who competes at a high level. He is an unselfish player who accepts his role as an off-ball contributor. When needed, he creates for himself or others, but he is best suited off-ball where he can move the ball, space the floor, and be active on the offensive glass. He threatens the defense from all three-levels but needs to improve his efficiency to warrant higher usage. Defensively, Martin competes at a high level. He remains active and engaged. He lacks size but is an explosive athlete who plays with physicality. This allows him to match up against bigger competition, but he is most effective defending opposing guards.

Expectations

I expect Martin to fluctuate on the line between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. He will continually compete for a larger role while playing limited minutes at the end of a non-competitive contest averaging about 6 minutes a game. Martin will provide great energy whether he is on the court or on the bench. On the court, Martin is best suited as an off-ball guard where he can space the floor, move the ball in the flow of the offense, and compete on the offensive glass. He can create for himself or others, but he needs to improve his efficiency to warrant increased usage. Defensively, Martin is smaller in stature but plays with great strength and physicality. His playing time will be limited since he is best matched up against opposing guards. He will provide energy and activity at a high level to compliment the defensive scheme. If Martin improves his offensive efficiency and defensive production, he can earn a larger role playing 10-12 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Martin has sound footwork from the perimeter and while playing off two feet. He utilizes either pivot foot and maintains his composure while setting up his attack. He lacks size, and as a result, he struggles to finish near the rim. He counters this deficiency by playing off two feet to create space for his shot or a pass.

Martin is a skilled ball handler. He sequences multiple dribbles moves together. He stops well with the ball and demonstrates shiftiness to change directions. He is effective on-ball but compliments the offense better in an off-ball role due to his inefficiencies.

Martin is a decent shooter who threatens the defense from all three-levels. He has a long release but consistent form. He shoots well off the dribble or off the catch. He needs to improve his efficiency to find a consistent role at the next level. He also needs to improve his ability to finish near the rim. This is a challenge for him due to his smaller stature.

Off-ball, Martin compliments the offense well. He is unselfish and accepts his role off- ball to move the ball in the flow of the offense, cut, space the floor, and be active on the offensive glass. He spaces the floor and keeps his hands active to shoot from three.

Defensive Notes

Martin is an effective defender but remains limited. He is smaller in size but has great strength to play with physicality. He has a high motor and demonstrates consistent engagement. He communicates with his teammates and plays within the defensive scheme. He defends in a low and wide stance to maintain his balance while changing directions.

On-ball, Martin competes against larger opponents, but he is most effective against opposing guards of similar stature. He is physical and keeps his hands active to disrupt his opposition. He moves his feet well but has moments where he reaches in or stops. This allows defenders to get by him.

Off-ball, Martin compliments the defense well. He plays within the scheme. He communicates with his teammates and is on time during rotations. He maintains his awareness to get around screens. He is physical after switches, and he consistently battles on the defensive glass.

61

Vladislav Goldin

253.4

Summary

Goldin presents as a strong and physical center who lacks the mobility to play effectively on the perimeter. Goldin is tall with an imposing reach. He plays to his strengths in the paint and battles hard for low post positioning. His offense revolves around setting screens, rolling, posting up, and being active on the offensive glass. He is comfortable isolating on the block to finish with either hand. Goldin also demonstrated a willingness to shoot from the perimeter albeit at a low volume. Defensively, Goldin is very limited as he relies on this size and length to protect the rim and secure rebounds. He is slow on the perimeter and struggles to cover ground or change directions. This makes him a consistent target for opposing teams.

Expectations

I expect Goldin to fluctuate on the line between the G League and the back end of an NBA roster. If Goldin makes an NBA roster, I expect him to compete for a larger role while garnering most of his minutes in mop up duty playing up to 6 minutes to finish a game. Offensively, Goldin will lean on his strengths to be a post presence and a strong screen setter. He will benefit from increasing his confidence and volume of three-point attempts to provide more value on the offensive end. Defensively, Goldin is often exploited and targeted on the perimeter due to his lack of footspeed. He is limited to drop coverage during screen situations and defenses can take advantage of this weakness during his playing time. He will need to be a force in the paint to warrant playing time. If Goldin expands his offensive game and positions himself better on the defensive end, he can earn a more consistent reserve role playing 10-12 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Goldin has sound footwork on the low block. He is comfortable isolating to create his attempts. He sequences a multitude of pivot moves. His effectiveness while isolating is aided by his ability to finish with either hand. He flashes the ability to set up his attack from the mid post or perimeter, but this is not a strength of his game.

His ball handling is below average, and he is exposed to turnovers if asked to create off the dribble. His game is best utilized from the low block or during DHO situations.

As a shooter, Goldin has decent form, but his efficiency remains below average from the free throw line. He converted his threes at a below average efficiency, and he needs to increase his volume to warrant attention on the perimeter as a pick and pop option. He converts most of his attempts near the rim. He has good touch in the paint and finishes comfortably using either hand.

Off-ball, Goldin sets solid screens. He has good timing with his guard and knows when to slip the action and when to roll. He keeps his hands active and ready to receive a pass. He is active on the glass to generate second chance opportunities. He also runs the floor well to create advantages in transition.

Defensive Notes

Goldin is very limited on the defensive end. He has good size, strength, and length but his lack of athleticism, footspeed, and lateral agility hamper his ability to defend on the perimeter. His positioning and reactions are slightly slow which doesn’t bode well with his athletic limitations.

On-ball, Goldin will be exposed on the perimeter. This weakness reduces his screen coverage options as he will be targeted often if asked to switch, trap, or hedge. In the post, he is very strong. He holds his ground well and contests without fouling. His long arms aid his ability to alter shots even though his jumping ability is limited.

Off-ball, Goldin anchors the paint. As discussed, his footspeed deficiency limits his defensive options and forces him to play in drop coverage. He struggles with his positioning off-ball. This pulls him too far from the action to close out or rotate. He is slow to cover ground and as a result doesn’t protect the rim at a high level that you would expect of a seven-footer. He is physical and active on the defensive glass. Despite his efforts on the glass, his rebounding rate is uninspiring. He needs to secure a higher number of defensive rebounds to warrant minutes on the floor.

62

Coleman Hawkins

215*

Summary

Hawkins presents as an offensive oriented front court player who threatens the defense from all three-levels albeit at a low efficiency. Hawkins is generally undersized as a front court player but has a positive arm length ratio. He is well developed on the offensive end. He has good footwork, ball handling, and court awareness, but his effectiveness is diminished as he struggles with his decision making, ball security, and shooting efficiency. He is a confident player who creates or finishes but should warrant a low usage role due to his deficiencies. He is limited on the defensive end as he lacks agility, balance, and effort. He relies on his length and instincts to generate deflections but altogether is exposed in the post as well as on the perimeter on the defensive end.

Expectations

I expect Hawkins to primarily play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. He is an offensive oriented player who creates for himself, distributes to his teammates, and scores from all three-levels but does so at a below average level. He requires a high usage to utilize his ability, but he is deficient and will be a net negative if tasked with a large offensive load. On the defensive end, he may generate deflections using his length and instincts, but he will be a regular target by opposing teams. He will have difficulty defending in space and holding his ground in the post. If he improves his offensive efficiency and decision making while demonstrating more consistent effort on the defensive end, he can contribute in a reserve role playing 10-18 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Hawkins offensive footwork is well developed. He demonstrates good composure for a front court player while setting up and executing his attack using the triple threat. He utilizes either pivot foot and has a long first step to gain an advantage. He plays off two feet during his attack and demonstrates the ability to create during post up situations. Unfortunately, he struggles to maximize these abilities as he forces the issue too often.

His ball handling is advanced. He handles the ball like a guard while sequencing dribble moves albeit at a lower speed of execution. He creates space well and has the same struggles regarding his decision making and shot selection.

He threatens the defense from all three-levels but is deficient from all areas of the court. His shooting release is inconsistent, and Hawkins is prone to wild misses at any time. Despite his inefficiencies, he maintains his confidence to garner respect from the defense. He lacks athleticism and length to consistently finish near the rim and that may be why he has a perimeter-oriented style of play.

He offers floor spacing ability. He sets solid screens and moves well without the ball. He reads the defense well and swings the ball quickly after receiving passes. Unfortunately, he is prone to forcing passes into tight areas which exposes him to turnovers. He is active on the glass and generates second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

Hawkins is limited as a defender. Overall, he relies on his instincts and length to generate deflections off-ball. He struggles to maintain his balance as he plays in an nonathletic stance. His footspeed is deficient, and his strength needs to improve.

Hawkins struggles to defend the ball whether he is on the perimeter or in the paint. On the perimeter, his deficient footspeed puts him at a constant disadvantage. He struggles to move his feet and as a result reaches in hoping to generate a steal. This exposes him to drives and foul trouble. On the block, Hawkins lacks strength and height to hold his own against NBA size post players. He competes but loses his balance versus post moves as he leans on his opponents to hold his position.

He is more effective off-ball where he can read the action and attempt to generate a deflection. He has good awareness and instincts. He is effective when he is positioned appropriately, but oftentimes, he is out of position and struggles to recover. He is slow while covering ground and he is late during defensive rotations. He offers rim protection due to his length but needs to be in position to do so. Fortunately, he is willing to boxout and compete on the glass to secure defensive rebounds. He may struggle versus bigger and stronger opponents, but he will compete.

63

Andrew Carr

210*

Summary

Carr presents as a high energy long wing who contributes to a complimentary role on the offensive and defensive end. Carr has great size and length. He has a high motor and moves well without the ball, maintains his activity on the glass, and generates deflections on the defensive end. Offensively, he is a complimentary piece who threatens the defense from all three-levels. His shooting release is long and inconsistent so that is an area of growth if he expects to secure a role at the next level. He scores through activity as he is inefficient while attempting to create for himself. Defensively, Carr maintains his high energy and motor. He uses his length well to disrupt ball handlers and passing lanes. He lacks the footspeed and lateral agility to defend on the perimeter, but his hustle gives him an opportunity to recover. He also lacks strength which affects his ability to hold his ground on the block.

Expectations

I expect Carr to primarily play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. He will be a complimentary piece on the offensive end during his minutes without demanding the ball. He is best suited for an off-ball role where he can set screens, cut, relocate, and crash the glass. He struggles to create for himself, so this is an area of development if he hopes to expand his role. Defensively, Carr offers good length and effort to defend against different personnel. He is a limited athlete who needs to improve his strength, but he competes hard and most importantly, is reliable. He will play within the defensive scheme and hustle to generate extra possessions. If he improves his scoring efficiency, creation ability, and strength, he can earn a consistent role off the bench playing 10-14 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Carr’s footwork is inconsistent. He flashes ability to execute and create but struggles to determine the right move at the right time. His footwork is more composed on the block than on the perimeter. During post isolations, he executes his pivot moves and his ball fakes well to create an opening. Unfortunately, he lacks the strength and power to finish effectively in the post, especially against NBA size and athleticism.

His ball handling is also an area of improvement. He struggles to sequence multiple dribble moves together or maintain control of the ball against pressure. He is more effective attacking in a direct line where he uses his long strides and length to get to the rim.

His shooting is a bit of an adventure. He is below average shooting from three. His efficiency may be related to his prolonged shooting release and inconsistent follow through. This appears to affect his conversion rate from the free throw line as well. As mentioned above, Carr’s rim finishing ability is impacted by his lack of size and athleticism. He struggles to finish near the rim and will have more challenges versus NBA competition.

Off-ball, Carr is very active. He moves well without the ball. He locates weak spots within the defense and flashes his hands to receive the pass. He also offers the ability to set screens. He reads the defense well and understands when to roll, slip, or pop the action. Lastly, Carr is very active on the offensive glass. He constantly crashes the glass looking for second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Carr maintains his effectiveness through his hustle and effort. He has long arms and maintains his activity. This allows him to influence passing lanes and offer rim protection. He needs to sit lower in his stance to improve his ability to maintain his balance and change directions. Although he is often over-matched by athleticism, his length and effort allow him to recover.

On-ball, Carr has his challenges on the perimeter and in the post. He lacks footspeed and lateral agility to defend athletic guards and wings. He finds himself in a trailing position often. In the post, Carr lacks strength and has difficulty holding his ground. He will compete but leans on his opponents to generate leverage. This exposes him to numerous post moves. If he is in position, his length offers rim protection.

Carr is more effective off-ball. He maintains his effort and attention to read and react to the defense. His long arms influence passes and he generates deflections at a decent rate. He may be slow to change directions, but his long strides allow him to cover ground effectively. This helps him rotate and recover appropriately. He is willing to battle for rebounds, but his lack of strength makes it challenging for him to prevent strong opponents from obtaining offensive rebounds.

64

Chris Youngblood

212*

Summary

Youngblood presents as a floor spacing specialist who lacks size, athleticism, and self- creation ability to contribute outside of that role. Youngblood is a very dangerous and confident shooter. Outside of his shooting ability, he is riddled with limitations. He is an average ball handler, decreased self-creator, and lacks athleticism to finish near the rim. These deficiencies force Youngblood to contribute from the perimeter. Fortunately, he has a quick consistent release, and he moves well without the ball. Defensively, Youngblood is very limited. It is difficult to identify a consistent role for him at the next level. He has the size of a guard but lacks the athleticism to keep up with them on the perimeter. He has great strength but lacks the length to compete against wings. His effort and hustle are admirable characteristics but the deficiencies in his size and athleticism put him at a consistent disadvantage on the defensive end.

Expectations

I expect Youngblood to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. He will serve as a shooting specialist who can heat up from three. His playing time may fluctuate based on whether he is generating and converting threes at a high volume. Outside of shooting, his offensive contributions are very limited. On the defensive end, Youngblood will be exposed and targeted often. It will be a challenge to determine who he should match up against since he will either be at a size or athletic disadvantage. A team can rely on his effort on the defensive end, but that effort is unlikely to turn into regular production. Three-point shooting is Youngblood’s lifeline at the next level. If he can convert his threes at a high volume and efficiency, he will find a role on an NBA roster playing up to 10-14 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Youngblood has sound footwork but doesn’t utilize it to attack the rim but rather to set up his perimeter shot or counter an aggressive closeout. He moves well without the ball and sets his feet quickly to get into his shooting motion. If a defender is in his shooting space, he uses his footwork to relocate for a better attempt. He demonstrates the ability to play off two feet. He relies on this skill when attacking the rim since he lacks explosiveness to finish over rim protectors.

Youngblood's ball handling is basic but effective while attempting to create space for his shot. He gathers the ball cleanly off the dribble to get into his shooting motion. He dribbles to shoot rather than pass which decreasing his effectiveness as a facilitator.

He is a high-level shooter. His shooting motion is compact, quick, and consistent. He shoots effectively off the catch and off the dribble. He moves well without the ball and sets his feet quickly to obtain his balance before shooting. He is a confident shooter who is always a threat to elevate for his shot. His effectiveness as a scorer is restricted to the perimeter as he loses his efficiency while approaching the rim.

Off-ball, Youngblood is very effective. He moves well without the ball. He is comfortable running off pin-downs, staggers, or flare actions to create space for his shot. He keeps his hands ready to receive the ball and get into his shooting motion. Since his game is perimeter oriented, he doesn’t offer much production on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Youngblood is limited. His effort and motor are high, but his ability is deficient. He lacks athleticism and length. Both affect his ability to cover ground or change directions.

On-ball, Youngblood has the size of a guard but the strength of a wing. Against guards, he is exposed to dribble drives. Against wings, he offers little in the way of contesting their shot attempts. This affects his ability to defend on the perimeter and in the post. Even with his persistent hustle, he lacks the length and athleticism to recover and contest.

Off-ball, Youngblood maintains his engagement. He rotates on time. He is physical during switches. He pursues the ball well and is fearless while protecting the rim. He hustles back on defense during transition opportunities, and he is willing to compete on the defensive glass to secure rebounds. His effort is inspiring, but it doesn’t translate into consistent defensive production.

65

Dink Pate

200.8

Summary

Pate presents as a very raw athletic wing who continues to require a lot of development. Overall, he has weaknesses in all aspects of his game, and it is difficult to identify a specific strength. He is long, young, and athletic. He demonstrates the ability to contribute on the offensive glass, score on cuts, and space the floor but he is an inefficient shooter who struggles with ball security. His length and athleticism suggest defensive potential, but he has a low impact on the court. His defensive awareness and attention are low. He is unbalanced, reactive, and prone to many lapses off-ball suggesting he needs a lot of coaching to reach his supposed potential.

Expectations

I expect Pate to primarily play in the G League to compete for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. At this point, his role on the offensive end will be limited to energy and floor spacing. He needs to develop his creation ability, ball security, and shooting efficiency to warrant regular usage. On the defensive end, he will provide energy on the glass and hopefully improve his awareness and engagement to be in the right place at the right time. He has a lot of areas of improvement, but his age is on his side. If he can round out his game and utilize his size appropriately, he could earn a limited role playing 10-12 minutes a game during certain situations.

Offensive Notes

Pate’s offensive footwork needs development. He lacks control on the offensive end and composure to set up his attack. This likely stems from his diminished fundamentals while setting up his attacks.

His ball handling is developed but he needs fine tuning to increase his effectiveness and ball control to create better opportunities and reduce his turnovers. He executes big moves but will benefit from coordinating them with his footwork to become more efficient while attacking.

His shooting is poor. He struggles to convert from all three-levels. His free throw shooting does not suggest great promise for his future development. Positive aspects of his shot are his range and ball rotation. He needs a lot of development to improve his consistency.

Off-ball, Pate is relatively active on the offensive glass. His shooting efficiency reduces his impact as a floor spacer as he does not warrant great attention currently. He will benefit from more off-ball movement to utilize his size and athleticism to receive the ball with momentum toward the basket. He also utilizes his athleticism to threaten the defense in transition.

Defensive Notes

Pate’s defense leaves a lot to be desired. He does not offer much in the sense of production. He has great length and size, but he does not utilize it to his full capability. He defends in a poor stance and demonstrates deficient awareness, attention, and engagement.

On-ball, Pate is over reactive to ball fakes and dribble moves. He puts himself out of position and is off-balance while attempting to recover. He plays defense in a vertical stance which affects his ability to change speeds and directions. He struggles to get around ball screens and opens his hips frequently creating attacking angles for his opponents.

Off-ball, Pate struggles to remain engaged. He is often out of position and lacks control while closing out. His impact is limited and does generate deflections at a rate that you would expect of an athletic wing that possesses his size. He also lacks activity on the defensive glass. His boxout effort is poor and very susceptible to offensive rebounds. He has a lot of areas to improve. Some are in terms of skill and others in terms of effort.

66

Javon Small

190

Summary

Small presents as an offensive oriented guard who contributes on the defense but lacks consistency and effort to make a regular impact. Small is a slightly undersized but shifty guard. He plays well on- or off-ball. He demands a high usage to be effective since he struggles with efficiency. He threatens the defense from all three-levels and has an innate ability to get to the free throw. He is a willing passer but struggles with decision making and ball security. On the defensive end, Small has good footwork and quick footspeed. When engaged, he cuts off driving angles easily. He has disruptive hands that generate steals and deflections. The issue is that his effort and consistency is lacking. He needs to improve his defensive motor.

Expectations

I expect Small to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. He plays on- or off-ball on the offensive end but he requires high usage to make up for his poor efficiency. He is a dynamic guard who is difficult to stay in front of, but he struggles with his decision making and ball security. These are areas he needs to improve to improve his consistency. On the defensive end, Small is limited regarding the opposition he is matched up against. He is a smaller guard who needs to match up against those with a similar size. He will apply ball pressure but lacks consistency on the defensive end. If Small improves his offensive efficiency and defensive effort, he can earn a reserve role playing up to 10-12 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Small has sound footwork but does most of his damage with the ball in his hand. He demonstrates capability out of the triple threat or while playing off two feet. He will benefit from using these aspects of his game to improve his attack and decrease his turnovers.

Small is a very shifty and dynamic ball handler. He sequences dribble moves effortlessly and uses his handles to create an advantage. He has a quick first step to get by defenders and gathers the ball cleanly to set up his shot or his pass. He struggles to handle the ball against intense pressure or long defenders. In these circumstances, his footwork will assist his ability to attack him. He also sets up and utilizes screens nicely.

As a shooter, Small has good form. He has a consistent release, and he shoots off the catch and off the dribble. He is average from three but shoots at a high volume to warrant respect. He struggles to finish near the rim and seeks contact while attacking. His propensity to draw fouls leads to poor shot attempts and turnovers. He will benefit from playing off two feet in the lane to improve his efficiency.

Off-ball, Small remains in motion. He relocates well and understands how to attack after receiving passes. He offers floor spacing ability but overall, his impact is felt at a higher degree while handling the ball. He pushes the ball well in transition but don’t expect him to contribute much on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Small is an effective but inconsistent defender. He plays in a low stance. He has quick feet and moves laterally with fluidity. He has good anticipation and cuts off driving lanes well. The problem is that his effort is inconsistent throughout a game. He picks his points when he dials up the defensive effort and intensity.

On-ball, Small is limited as to who he can match up against. He is restricted to defending guards of a similar stature as larger guards or wings will overwhelm him. He moves his feet quickly to cut off driving lanes and he keeps his hands active to generate steals. He is very effective when he wants to be.

Off-ball, Small is less active and engaged. He does not consistently communicate with his teammates. He is late on rotations and often cheats passing lanes to generate steals. He needs to improve his awareness, effort, and consistency to make a positive impact while defending off the ball. He is willing to boxout but his effectiveness while doing so is low.

67

Matthew Cleveland

200*

Summary

Cleveland presents as a high energy athletic wing who offers offensive potential with defensive versatility. Cleveland has good size and great length. He is a slashing wing who attacks well using his long strides but struggles to change directions. He is a three- level scorer, and he demonstrated his greatest efficiency this past season. In previous seasons, his efficiency suffered from shot selection, but he demonstrated greater discipline during this past season. Defensively, he has good length and plays with consistent energy. He offers the ability to defend against guards and wings, but he needs to improve his discipline as he is prone to mistakes and lapses while defending on- and off-ball.

Expectations

I expect Cleveland to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. He will serve as a complimentary piece on both ends of the floor. Offensively, he is better suited to play in an off-ball role where he can space the floor, cut, and be active on the offensive glass. Cleveland attacks to score rather than facilitate which lowers his effectiveness on-ball. On the defensive end, Cleveland has the frame, length, and athleticism to defend multiple positions. He needs to improve his discipline to improve his effectiveness and reduce his mistakes. If Cleveland improves his offensive production and reduces his defensive errors, he can earn a larger role playing 8-12 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Cleveland has sound footwork while setting up his attacks. He relies on his large first step to generate an advantage against his opponent. He is a slashing attacker who needs a direct lane to the rim to be effective. He demonstrates the ability to play off two feet, but his lack of facilitation and propensity to shoot midrange shots lowers his efficiency.

As a ball handler, Cleveland executes basic moves. He relies on big crossovers versus explosive ones. He may struggle to maintain the ball against pressure and as mentioned above, he is most effective if he has a clear lane toward the rim.

Cleveland improved his shooting substantially during this past season. He increased his three-point volume while improving his shooting percentage. This development will be a key factor to determine his ability to contribute at the NBA level. He is not as effective scoring from the midrange or in the paint. This is another area of improvement Cleveland needs to work on.

Off-ball, Cleveland maintains high activity. He spaces the floor well and continually relocates without the ball. He is an effective cutter and uses his long striding ability to get past defenders who are closing out aggressively. He uses this same ability to attack the defense well in transition. He also demonstrates a willingness to crash the glass and generate second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

On the defensive end, Cleveland offers even higher upside. He has decent height, plus length, and good athleticism to project as a multi-positional defender. He needs to improve his defensive stance and footwork to tap into this potential more. His high stance affects his ability to change directions. That is a valuable skill for a perimeter- oriented defender.

On-ball, Cleveland has the length and athleticism to bother ball handlers. He doesn’t disrupt their activity at a degree and his consistency needs to improve to find a role at the next level. He lacks discipline while guarding the ball and he is too reactive to ball fakes or dribble moves. Fortunately, he recovers well, and his length allows him to contest.

Off-ball, Cleveland has the potential to be more disruptive. He should use his length to generate more deflections. Unfortunately, he does not do this on a consistent level and makes me concerned about his long-term prospects. He communicates well and is in position during rotations. He constantly crashes the glass to secure defensive rebounds. He is a serious threat to score in transition after securing defensive rebounds.

68

John Tonje

211.8

Summary

Tonje presents as an offensive oriented physical guard who offers little defensive upside and production. Tonje is well developed on the offensive end. He lacks explosiveness but executes by using fundamentals and savviness on and off the ball. He is a scorer over a facilitator who threatens the defense from all three-levels. He is a consistent three-point shooter, and he can attack aggressive closeouts to get into the paint. He seeks contact on his drives and draws a high number of fouls. On the defensive end, Tonje is deficient on- and off-ball. He is slow footed with delayed reactions. As a result, he is easily screened and has difficulty recovering. He also lacks attention and effort off the ball. This puts him late during his rotations and he is susceptible to backdoor cuts.

Expectations

I expect Tonje to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. He is a one-sided player at this point who primarily contributes on the offensive end as a scorer. He will space the floor and offer self-creation ability. He lacks athleticism and length, so his overall upside is limited. To improve his effectiveness on the offensive end, he needs to improve his facilitation ability. Defensively, Tonje will be targeted on and off the ball. He will struggle to defend on the perimeter and in the post. He will be out of position often which will force him to recover. He needs to improve his defensive attention, awareness, and effort to contribute positively. If Tonje improves his offensive passing and defensive engagement, he could earn a limited reserve role playing 8-12 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Tonje’s footwork is well developed. He is comfortable creating out of the triple threat. He lacks explosiveness which affects his ability to get to the rim. As a result, he developed his ability to play off two feet and he executes this technique extremely well. He sequences his pivots, jab steps, and ball fakes to create space.

Tonje is a limited ball handler. He lacks quick dribble moves and relies on exaggerating techniques to get by his initial defender. He gathers the ball cleanly off the dribble but primarily looks to score versus pass.

He is a very effective shooter and threatens the defense from all three-levels. He improved his three-point efficiency while increasing his volume this past season. He shoots well off the catch and off the dribble. He sets his feet quickly and has a consistent follow through. He primarily scores from beyond the arc and in the midrange. He is a limited athlete who lacks length, and this affects his ability to consistently finish near the rim. Tonje depends on force to get his shot up versus finesse. This results in a high number of fouls and free throw attempts.

Off-ball, Tonje remains in constant motion. He relocates well to maintain spacing. He times his cuts and keeps his hands ready to catch the pass and elevate for a shot. He can utilize off-ball actions such as pin-downs, DHOs, and staggers. He is willing to crash the glass but finds himself on the perimeter during most of his possessions.

Defensive Notes

Tonje lacks defensive production and generally presents as a negative contributor on that end of the floor. His defensive stance is high, and he lacks balance and footspeed. He is a dangerous combination of overreaction to fakes and late reactions to off-ball movement.

On-ball, Tonje is easily exposed on the perimeter. He is a strong physical guard who struggles with footspeed, lateral agility, and change of directions. He is broken down too easily and puts a lot of pressure on the second line of the defense. Tonje struggles to guard in space as he reacts strongly to fakes and is delayed recognizing and negotiating screens. Fortunately, he uses his strength well to hold his position in the post, but to find a role at the NBA level, he needs to improve his on-ball defense.

Off-ball, Tonje continues to struggle. He lacks engagement. This forces him to be out of position, late on rotations, or beaten on backdoors. He is late to react and struggles to get around off-ball screens. Each of these detriments lead to poor recovery and lazy closeouts. He is easily beaten to the rim after closing out. He does not generate a high number of deflections. And his activity on the defensive glass is uninspiring.

69

Matthew Murrell

200*

Summary

Murrell presents as a undersized floor spacing, high energy defensive guard. Murrell is a perimeter-oriented guard. He is an effective shooter off the catch or off the dribble. He moves well without the ball to maintain spacing for his teammates. He is undersized and as a result limited as a creator. He also lacks facilitation ability which decreases his offensive utilization. Defensively, Murrell plays with high energy. He is aggressive and engaged. Although he lacks size and length, he plays with great charisma and physicality. He accepts challenges and competes hard. He communicates with his teammates and positions himself appropriately within the team concept.

Expectations

I expect Murrell to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. He is a limited offensive player who threatens the defense from the perimeter. He is also undersized and lacks facilitation instincts and as a result, he will be limited to an off-ball floor spacing role. On the defensive end, Murrell will provide high energy. He is a reliable defender who will play within the defense scheme. He will compete with energy and physicality. Unfortunately, he is undersized. He is limited as to who he can defend, and his defensive impact will be less impactful against taller or larger opponents. If Murrell converts his threes at a high efficiency and volume, he can earn a reserve shooting specialist role off the bench playing between 6-10 minutes a night.

Offensive Notes

Murrell has sound footwork. He uses his triple threat well to gain advantages. Due to his diminutive size, he attacks the defense from the perimeter and utilizes his footwork to create space for his shots. He obtains his balance well and quickly gets into his shooting motion. He also sets his feet quickly while running actions off-ball.

Murrell is a limited ball handler. He lacks creativity and ultimately focuses on efficiency of his dribbles to create space for his shots. This limits his on-ball creation and facilitation ability.

As a shooter, Murrell is very effective. He shoots off the dribble and off the catch with similar effectiveness. He has a very compact shooting stroke with a quick release. He obtains his balance quickly to improve the consistency of his shot. His efficiency dropped during this past season and his shooting ability is his lifeline to find a role at the next level. Due to his smaller size and lack of athleticism, Murrell struggles to finish near the rim. As a result, he focuses his attack from the perimeter.

Murrell moves continuously without the ball. He relocates and maintains the spacing within the offense. He keeps his hands ready expecting to receive a pass for a shot. He maintains his effectiveness running off-ball action around staggers, pin-downs, and flare screens. He has a high motor and contributes on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Murrell is an effective defender but unfortunately, he is matchup dependent. Murrell lacks size and length. This affects his ability to play against larger opponents and limits him to defending opposing guards. He plays with high energy. He is physical against switches onto taller personnel, but his presence is not felt while contesting their shots. He plays defense in a low and wide stance. He has quick feet and great anticipation.

On-ball, Murrell routinely bothers opposing ball handlers. He defends them with his feet to cut off driving angles and generates steals using his active hands. He anticipates screens well which allows him to navigate them smoothly. As mentioned, he is very willing to get physical against his opponents regardless of their size. He is effective during limited possessions but over exposure will be problematic.

Off-ball, Murrell maintains his high energy and awareness. He understands the defensive scheme and communicates effectively with his teammates. He is reliable and on time during rotations or while closing out. He keeps his hands active and reads actions well to jump passing lanes. He helps and recovers quickly. Lastly, he demonstrates a willingness to locate bodies and boxout to secure defensive rebounds.

70

Mark Sears

183.4

Summary

Sears presents as an undersized offensive oriented guard who relies on volume and struggles with ball security and defensive impact. Sears is a very shifty ball handler. He is aggressive and confident. He is a relentless attacker who is difficult to stay in front of. He threatens the defense from all three-levels but lacks efficiency due to his size and over aggressiveness. He facilitated more during this past season and will need to improve that aspect of his game. On the defensive end, Sears effort is inconsistent, and he lacks size and strength. He is often targeted by opposing teams as they can exploit his disadvantages to create quality attempts. Sears defensive impact will continue to present as a negative aspect of his game.

Expectations

I expect Sears to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. He is an offensive oriented player that needs the ball in his hands to thrive. He relies on high usage to be effective but unfortunately, he struggles with efficiency and ball security which dissuades high usage utilization. On the defensive end, Sears is perpetually at a disadvantage regardless of the opponent he is matched up against. His lack of size negatively affects him and his defensive effort inconsistencies compound that effect. If Sears improves his efficiency, reduces his turnovers, and facilitates more, he can earn a reserve role playing between 6-10 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Sears footwork is well developed. He utilizes either pivot foot on the perimeter. He uses the triple threat very effectively to keep defenders off-balance while setting up his attack. He plays off two feet well while approaching the second line of defense. In my opinion, he should utilize it more as it may lead to less turnovers. His diminutive size makes it difficult for him to find space when he penetrates too deep into the paint.

Sears is a very skilled ball handler. All dribble moves are within his arsenal. He sequences them effortlessly as he searches for an opportunity to attack. He changes speeds and directions with the ball well. He can stop abruptly with the ball as a defender is rushing to recover. He sets up and utilizes screens well to create space. Unfortunately, he struggles to identify appropriate space to attack. He penetrates deep into the defense, resulting in congestion and turnovers.

Sears is a confident, dangerous, but streaky shooter. He is notorious for going long stretches without converting a shot only to follow that up with consecutive threes. He is unpredictable. The unpredictability could be a combination of his small stature and his difficult shot diet. He takes difficult shots because that is how he creates space. This lowers his efficiency which he supplements by increasing his volume. This strategy will not be as effective at the NBA level. He also struggles to finish in the paint, and this will reinforce his propensity to shoot from the perimeter.

Off-ball, Sears offers floor spacing ability. He is always a threat to shoot. He is a ball dominant player, but his activity and movement off-ball are present. He benefits from improving his off-ball movement to find a role at the next level. And due to his size and perimeter style of play, don’t expect him to be active on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Sears is at a constant disadvantage on the defensive end. He lacks size and length. He also plays with inconsistent effort and poor defensive technique. It’s a poor combination which lowers his overall effectiveness.

On-ball, Sears is limited in who he can matchup against. He will continuously be at a disadvantage on the defensive end and the taller his opponent, the greater the disadvantage. He is over reactive and overaggressive while guarding the ball on the perimeter. He gambles for steals, and this creates easy angles for his opponents to attack. He is willing to play with physicality on the block, but this is an area he will require help from his teammates to support him.

Off-ball. Sears activity is inconsistent. His awareness and attention are low at times. This puts him out of position or late during rotations. He requires a lot of support from his teammates as his defensive production and consistency is unreliable. He also doesn’t offer support on the defensive glass.

71

RJ Davis

160*

Summary

Expectations

Offensive Notes

Defensive Notes

72

Ryan Nembhard

175.8

Summary

Nembhard presents as an undersized facilitating guard who is unselfish playing with a pass first mentality, and he is often targeted on the defensive end. Nembhard is a very skilled ball handler. He is shifty with the ball and changes speeds and directions quickly. He breaks down his initial defenders well and looks to pass while approaching the second line of defense. His pass first mentality decreases his effectiveness as teams can play for the pass forcing him into turnovers or inefficient shot attempts. Defensively, Nembhard plays with a lot of effort and heart, but he lacks size. His technique is sound, but his effectiveness is low. He is targeted by opposing teams often and this will limit his exposure on the floor at the next level.

Expectations

I expect Nembhard to play in the G League while competing to earn a roster spot. At the professional level, he will contribute as a facilitator and floor spacer. His efficiency suffers when he creates his own shot, and he needs to reduce his turnovers to sustain a consistent role. Defensively, Nembhard is significantly impacted by his size. He is small and light. This makes him a consistent target by opposing teams to take advantage of his deficiencies. He plays with a lot of effort and team’s that underestimate him will succumb themselves to turnovers as he is effective at generating steals. If Nembhard improves his offensive efficiency while decreasing his turnovers, he can earn a limited reserve role playing 8-10 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Nembhard has sound footwork. He executes his triple threat well and plays off two feet when approaching the second line of defense. He attacks to pass instead of shoot which lowers his overall effectiveness. He needs to have an aggressive mindset and use his stopping ability to create space for his shot. This will result in larger passing lanes as defenders collapse on him.

He is a very dynamic and a shifty ball handler. He is quick while manipulating the ball. He uses his dribble moves to create advantages and is quick to exploit them effectively. As mentioned above, he attacks to pass versus shoot which lowers his offensive effectiveness.

As a shooter, he has good form and a quick release. He threatens the defense from the perimeter and converts his threes at an impressive rate. He can shoot off the catch or off the dribble. He struggles to finish near the rim due to his small stature and limited athleticism. He creates space well while playing off two feet but does not capitalize on his opportunities at a consistent rate.

Off-ball, Nembhard offers floor spacing ability. He is more effective as the primary ball handler where he can break down the defense and create an opportunity for his teammate. He runs well in transition but doesn’t offer support on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Nembhard is consistently targeted by opposing teams. His effort is high, but his size is small, which puts him at a constant disadvantage on the defensive end of the floor. He maintains his intensity and plays with sound technique. He is engaged but he is prone to lapses when watching the ball.

As mentioned, Nembhard is consistently targeted by opposing teams. He will always be at a physical disadvantage where his presence is hardly felt. Opponents that do not respect his quickness will be exposed to steals. If he isn’t generating steals, his defensive impact is reduced.

Off-ball, Nembhard plays within the team concept. He is quick and can jump passing lanes but his awareness drifts at times. This exposes him to off-ball actions and backdoor cuts. He is willing to boxout but has a difficult time impeding defenders from obtaining rebounds.

73

Ryan Kalkbrenner

257.4

Summary

Kalkbrenner presents as a rim protecting center with floor spacing potential. Kalkbrenner has impressive size and length but lacks athleticism, balance, and footspeed. His offensive contributions are limited as he relies on others to create opportunities near the rim as his low post footwork lacks decisiveness and effectiveness. His lack of athleticism forces him to score with finesse rather than force in the paint which will be less effective at the next level. He offers a big body to set screens and the ability to make threes, but he needs to convert his shots at a higher efficiency and volume. On the defensive end, Kalkbrenner lacks mobility to guard in space. He is restricted to drop coverage during ball-screens and is slow to recover if out of position. When in position, Kalkbrenner is an imposing rim protector. He uses his length and verticality to challenge and block shots.

Expectations

I expect Kalkbrenner to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. He will be a complimentary piece on the offensive end where he can set screens, roll, pop, contribute on the offensive glass, and finish near the rim after post entry touches. His effectiveness on the offensive end depends on the depth at which he receives his passes. The further out he receives passes, the less effective he is. He demonstrates three-point ability but needs to convert his attempts at a higher efficiency and volume to warrant respect. Defensively, Kalkbrenner offers great size and length to effectively protect the rim. But out in space, he is exposed and at a significant disadvantage. This limits his defensive utility and makes him a consistent target by opposing teams. If Kalkbrenner improves his three-point shooting and defensive positioning, he could earn a limited reserve role playing 6-10 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Kalkbrenner’s footwork is not very effective. From the perimeter, it is non-existent, and, on the block, it is not as effective as you would expect from a seven-footer with good touch around the rim. He lacks a dominant move to rely on. His post touches are dependent on the positioning of where he receives the ball rather than what move he attempts. His lack of creativity negatively impacts his effectiveness.

Kalkbrenner is a very limited ball handler and will not be asked to dribble the ball often on the offensive end. Instead, his ball handling will be limited to low post touches and DHOs during two-man games.

Kalkbrenner offers the ability to stretch the floor. He converted his threes at a decent rate although his percentage is still considered below average. He is inefficient from the free throw line which doesn’t suggest great confidence into his long-term trajectory. He converts his attempts near the rim at a decent rate. He has good touch around the rim but relies too much on touch for a seven-footer. If he wants to maintain his effectiveness at the next level, he will need to improve his strength and footwork since he lacks athleticism.

Off-ball, Kalkbrenner provides a big body to set screens. He keeps his hands ready to receive the pass off a roll, pop, or slip action. He runs the floor hard in transition to obtain deep position versus a smaller defender. This works well to generate quality attempts throughout the game. He also is active on the offensive glass to create second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

Kalkbrenner is a very limited defender. He is great in one category, rim protection, but he is exposed in all other areas of his game. He has slow feet and struggles to defend in space. His reactions are slow, and he lacks the balance to change directions.

On-ball, Kalkbrenner holds his ground relatively well, but he did have difficulties against NBA quality opponents. He needs to increase his strength to improve his effectiveness. On the perimeter, Kalkbrenner offers little ability. He is constantly at a disadvantage and plays off coverage as a result.

His lack of mobility restricts his team’s defensive strategy against ball-screens. He is restricted to drop coverage, and any other coverage would expose him to dribble drives or step back attempts. He communicates well on the back line. He keeps his hands active and maintains verticality while contesting. He is slow while covering ground and can be out of position to protect the rim appropriately. Fortunately, he uses his big body well to boxout out defenders to secure defensive rebounds. He is quick to scan the floor and deliver strong outlet passes.

74

Clifford Omoruyi

240*

Summary

Expectations

Offensive Notes

Defensive Notes

75

TJ Bamba

208*

Summary

Bamba presents as an athletic physical multi-positional defensive player who lacks offensive efficiency. Bamba is a strong athlete with good size. He has good fundamental skills that do not translate into efficient production. He is a complimentary player who lacks a specific strength to rely on. Defensively, he offers the ability to defend against guards and wings. He has long arms and maintains good activity to generate deflections and steals. He is a complimentary defender versus the shutdown variety.

Expectations

I expect Bamba to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. On the offensive end, Bamba will contribute to a complimentary role. He is inefficient from the field so his usage will remain low, but he offers the ability to space the floor and provide energy as a cutter, rebounder, and transition threat. Defensively, Bamba can fit into varying lineups as he can match up against multiple personnel. He will provide energy and activity to generate deflections but may be exposed to errors if playing for long stretches. If Bamba improves his offensive efficiency while increasing his defensive production, he can earn a limited reserve role playing 6-10 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Bamba has well composed footwork out of the triple threat and while landing on two. He sets up his defenders well and creates advantages easily. He has a quick first step to get by his initial defender and plays off two feet versus the second line of defense. He creates quality space for his shots, so it is a mystery why he lacks efficiency while creating.

Bamba is also a skilled ball handler. He controls the ball well and sequences moves effectively to create an opening. Once again, despite his sound fundamentals, he struggles to convert his attempts. Fortunately, during this past season, his awareness and passing improved so he demonstrates the ability to facilitate but this is not a role he will be asked to perform at the next level.

His shooting is sound regarding form but he struggles to maintain a consistent release. His release affects the trajectory of the ball and lowers his overall efficiency from the field. This may be why he hesitates and is indecisive on the offensive end. If he improves his shooting release and confidence, he may reach the scoring potential that his footwork and ball handling suggests.

Off-ball, Bamba maintains high activity levels. He relocates and finds gaps within the defense. He maintains spacing and runs off-ball actions well. He is an athletic and powerful cutter who also threatens the defense in transition. He has a good motor and maintains his activity on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

As a defender, Bamba is effective but not special. He has a strong frame, good length, and adequate footspeed. He maintains his engagement and awareness but somehow does not produce at a high level. He is a complimentary defender who can match up against multiple opponents but does not necessarily shut them down.

On-ball, he has the speed to defend against guards and the strength to be physical against wings. He moves his feet well and maintains his balance while changing directions. He may be a step slow reacting, but he puts himself in good positions to contest. He has long active arms and generates steals at a decent rate.

Off-ball, Bamba plays within the team concept. He maintains his engagement and effort. He communicates and maintains active arms to impact passing lanes. He doesn’t produce stats or make his impact felt at a high level, but he is reliable, nonetheless. He uses his physicality and strength well to boxout on the defensive glass.

76

Augustsas Marciulionis

185*

Summary

Expectations

Offensive Notes

Defensive Notes

77

Mohamed Diawara

Summary

Expectations

Offensive Notes

Defensive Notes

78

Jalon Moore

203.4

Summary

Moore presents as an athletic and long wing who offers floor spacing or slashing ability coupled with defensive versatility. Moore has good size and length. He has sound offensive footwork and threatens the defense from all three-levels. He covers ground quickly as he strides across the lane. His ball handling needs development as he struggles to maintain control or understand spacing during his attack. He converted his shots at a high rate, but his misses were very variable suggesting volatility within his percentages. On the defensive end, he offers length and athleticism to defend against guards and wings. He plays with consistent effort. He demonstrates low defensive production despite his length and energy. He is slow to react while guarding the ball and has poor awareness while defending off-ball. Both aspects put him in trailing positions which force him to recover often.

Expectations

I expect Moore to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. Offensively, he presents as a complimentary piece who supports the offense in an off-ball role. He is a slasher, cutter, transition threat, and floor spacer. He lacks facilitation instincts and shooting efficiency to demand a high usage in an on-ball role. On the defensive end, he is also a support player. He will fit into variable lineups and match up against different personnel. He may be exposed against effective scorers and is better suited to defend against non-scoring threats. This lowers his defensive impact and is an area he needs to improve to grow his role. If Moore improves his shooting efficiency, passing instincts, and defensive reactions, he could earn a limited reserve role playing 6-8 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Moore has effective footwork. He executes out of the triple threat, but his greatest strength is playing off two feet after attacking. He lands with balance and utilizes either pivot foot to create an opening for his shot. He struggles to attack gaps within the defense and will force the action into congestion. This lowers his effectiveness and exposes him to turnovers.

Moore’s ball handling is basic but effective. He is a one dribble move attacker who uses his long stride to get by his defender. He lacks quickness while handling the ball and struggles against ball pressure.

Moore’s shooting percentages were good during this past season but as you watch film you observe his hot and cold nature. He is volatile and streaky. The shots look good when they’re falling but very poor when they are missing the rim altogether. This variability makes me question his long-term shooting potential and if he does not improve his consistency, he will have a hard time finding a consistent role at the next level.

Off-ball, Moore moves well to relocate and find space. He runs off actions well and looks to slash or cut to the rim after receiving passes on the perimeter. He has catch and shoot ability but as mentioned before, his consistency varies. He runs the floor well in transition and has good activity on the offensive glass.

Defensive Notes

Moore demonstrates defensive upside, but his production is low. He has a good size, length, and athleticism to present as a multi-positional defender. His defensive footwork and footspeed are effective, but his reactions and awareness are poor. He finds himself in trailing positions often and is forced to recover.

On-ball, Moore has the footspeed to keep up with guards. His footwork and length can be disruptive, but he has poor anticipation and is a step late to react. Fortunately, he hustles and has good length and striding ability to recover to contest. He has the length and strength to match up against wings and may be more effective against slower opponents that will have a harder time exploiting his deficit.

Off-ball, Moore has difficulty reading the defense and maintaining his awareness. This puts him out of position and late to recover. He is a liability on the defensive end if he doesn’t improve his positioning and awareness. Fortunately, he is active on the glass and demonstrates a willingness to boxout.

79

Johnell Davis

185*

Summary

Davis presents as a ball handling, high energy guard who struggles with efficiency and defensive discipline. Davis has decent size and effective footwork to create offense. He has a score first mindset and doesn’t offer facilitation currently. He threatens the defense from all three-levels but unfortunately, he struggles with his efficiency from the floor. As a defender, Davis has good size coupled with a high motor. He has an aggressive mindset and attempts to anticipate action to generate steals. He generates steals at a decent rate, but this leaves himself exposed if he guesses wrong.

Expectations

I expect Davis to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. Offensively, Davis will initiate the action in attempts to score. He needs to vastly improve his efficiency and facilitation ability if he expects to secure a role at the next level. On the defensive end, Davis is an aggressive defensive guard who generates steals at a good rate. Unfortunately, he lacks discipline and gambles for steals throughout the game which decreases his overall effectiveness. If Davis improves upon his offensive and defensive deficiencies, he could earn a limited reserve role playing 6-8 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Davis has well developed footwork. He uses his triple threat well to create an opening. He lacks great explosiveness to get by his initial defender and depends on his ability to play off two feet to generate a quality shot attempt. He utilizes either pivot foot to create an opening. Unfortunately, his lack of explosiveness and athleticism decreases his effectiveness against the second level of the defense.

Davis is an effective ball handler. He combines his moves well to create space for his attack. He changes speeds and directions well but should be considered average compared to NBA personnel. He attacks out of isolation but demonstrates the ability to utilize ball-screens.

As a shooter, Davis struggles with his efficiency. His high free throw rate suggests potential, but his efficiency suffers from shot selection, lack of athleticism, and offensive composure. His body control while attacking the rim is lacking and results in wild attempts hoping for fouls.

Off-ball, Davis is not as effective. He doesn’t profile as an efficient three-point shooter. His off-ball movement is lacking but he is effective running the floor in transition. He also uses his high motor to crash the glass to create second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

Davis has good size and length to impact opposing guards. His defensive contributions come from his high motor and aggressive play style. He is engaged on the defensive end as he attempts to read and anticipate the action to generate steals. His playstyle works well when he generates steals, but it exposes him and puts his teammates in poor positions if he fails.

On-ball, Davis matches up against guards well. His length and aggressiveness are disruptive. He plays with high energy, but his defensive technique is poor. He defaults to a run-and-recover technique while guarding the ball which makes it difficult for him to change directions. He also is over reactive to ball fakes and dribble moves which creates attacking angles for his opponents.

Off-ball, Davis plays a high-risk style of play. He is engaged to jump passing lanes. His length helps him tip passes but his style of play exposes him to backdoors and back cuts. He will also be late during rotations which puts his teammates in poor positions often. A positive aspect is that he is active on the glass to secure defensive rebounds.

80

Max Shulga

206.4

Summary

Shulga presents as a perimeter oriented on- and off-ball guard who is a limited athlete but plays sound defense. Shulga has a quick release and profiles as an effective shooter, but his efficiency dropped this past season. Despite the drop in efficiency, Shulga demonstrates court awareness, passing, and rebounding effort. On the defensive end, Shulga’s lacks athleticism and length to present as a high-level defender but he has sound technique and accurate defensive hands. His defensive footwork and accurate hands allow him to position himself appropriately to contest or generate deflections.

Expectations

I expect Shulga to play in the G League while competing for a roster spot on the backend of an NBA roster. He projects as a complimentary piece with no true upside. He doesn’t possess a high-end quality that he can lean into to find a consistent role. He profiles as a shooter, but he struggles with efficiency and at times, lacks confidence. He is a willing passer but struggles to create space to draw additional defenders to utilize his passing ability. Defensively, he plays with sound technique but lacks the athleticism to keep up with guards and the strength and length to match up against wings. He is reliable with active defensive hands but lacks specific traits to get excited about. If Shulga improves his shooting efficiency and self-creation ability, he can earn a limited reserve role playing 6-8 minutes a game.

Offensive Notes

Shulga’s footwork is solid. He is composed while creating out of the triple threat or playing off two feet. He has difficulty capitalizing on the advantages he creates due to his lack of burst. As a result, he is a limited self-creator.

His ball handling skills are average. He demonstrates comfort while handling the ball but does not generate a clear advantage from his moves. He also struggles to maintain control of the ball against pressure. These aspects lower his effectiveness on the offensive end. He is a willing passer. Shulga sees the floor well but hardly draws additional defenders to utilize his passing ability.

As a shooter, Shulga has a quick release and sound shooting form. Throughout his collegiate career, he was a productive shooter, but his efficiency dropped considerably during this past season. His shooting efficiency may suffer from his lack of athleticism and self-creation ability to generate quality attempts for himself.

Off-ball, Shulga spaces the floor well. He presents as a three-point threat but if his efficiency does not improve, he will not garner respect on the perimeter. He moves well without the ball to maintain spacing. He also crashes the glass to generate second chance opportunities.

Defensive Notes

Shulga is effective on defense but limited to a degree. He has decent size to affect guards, but he lacks the size to match up against wings. He uses sound technique and footwork while defending but overall lacks athleticism and quickness. This exposes him against quicker ball handlers, but he is savvy with good anticipation to remain effective but not elite.

On-ball, Shulga relies on his instincts, accurate defensive hands, and defensive footwork to position himself appropriately to contest or generate steals. He has more difficulty maintaining his effectiveness against quicker competition. Due to his lack of footspeed, he has difficulty navigating ball-screens. He also lacks the length and strength to match up against physical wings.

Off-ball, Shulga remains engaged. He communicates and is in position during defensive rotations. He is slow while covering ground, so he relies on his anticipation to position himself appropriately. He struggles to get around screens which exposes him to off-ball actions. He is willing to locate bodies to boxout to secure defensive rebounds.

bottom of page